Domain-general cognition contributes to semantically challenging speech comprehension

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

Claims that domain-general cognitive mechanisms contribute to language comprehension are long-standing but controversial. Critics argue that involvement reflects general task demands rather than a functional role in core components of comprehension such as meaning access, selection, maintenance, and update. A functional role may be observable under conditions that increase demand on these psycholinguistic processes. Here, we focus on the challenge of semantic ambiguity resolution. We tested whether domain-general cognitive ability, operationalised through tests of fluid intelligence, contributes to comprehension of semantically ambiguous speech over and above lexico-semantic knowledge (measured with vocabulary tests). In two web experiments, healthy adult volunteers (n=67, n=100) listened to sentences containing a mid-sentence ambiguous word, critical for interpretation, which were disambiguated by a sentence-final word. After each utterance, participants heard a single word from the sentence. They defined the sentence-specific meaning of the word by typing (open response Meaning Definitions Task, Experiment 1) or selecting from four alternatives (4AFC Meaning Verification Task, Experiment 2). Accuracy measures showed good reliability. A principal components analysis of the cognitive measures confirmed two latent constructs reflecting lexico-semantic knowledge and domain-general cognitive ability. Mixed-effects logistic regression showed that both constructs predicted comprehension accuracy (Experiment 1, Experiment 2). Importantly, the contribution of domain-general cognition was significantly greater for high-ambiguity sentences than similarly constructed sentences containing low-frequency unambiguous words (Experiment 2), showing that effects were not solely attributable to task demands. These findings demonstrate that domain-general cognition functionally contributes to semantic ambiguity resolution and supports core psycholinguistic processes when comprehension demands are high.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00