Multi-omics biomarkers in endometrial receptivity: from mechanisms to clinical translation
This review explores multi-omics biomarkers for endometrial receptivity, from biological mechanisms to limitations in clinical translation and potential integration with AI for precision medicine.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This paper reviews endometrial receptivity (ER) biology, focusing on the window of implantation and how immune factors and the microbiome shape the receptive uterine microenvironment, with an emphasis on multi-omics approaches spanning transcriptomic, epigenomic, proteomic, and metabolomic layers. It summarizes evidence that uterine fluid biomarkers could enable non-invasive assessment, and it describes mechanisms by which chronic endometritis, adenomyosis, and other conditions impair ER, including inflammatory imbalance, microbial dysbiosis, extracellular matrix remodeling abnormalities, and hormonal dysregulation. The authors highlight a translational gap, noting that commercial ER tests have limitations such as insufficient evidence and inconsistent results, alongside challenges of technical standardization, data integration, and poor model generalizability. Relevance to endometriosis: adenomyosis is explicitly discussed as impairing endometrial receptivity through inflammatory, microbial, extracellular matrix, and hormonal mechanisms, though the paper’s main focus is a broad review of multi-omics biomarkers and clinical translation for ER.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
3,865 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 3 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Conclusions
Acknowledgements
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-08-16T06:08:05.154520+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-08-16T06:03:30.117802+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-08-12T06:43:03.944938+00:00