Use of Bioelectric Impedance Analysis (BIA) as a new method to detect prostate cancer

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

Background To determine the accuracy of a novel BIA test endorectal probe. Methods One hundred-forty consecutive patient candidates to prostate biopsy and 40 healthy volunteers were selected ( NCT03428087 ). Total PSA and PSA density (PSAD) determinations, digital rectal examination (DRE), and the BIA test were analysed in patients and controls. A 16 cores trans rectal prostate biopsy was performed on all patients with clinical suspicion of PCa after a multiparametric MRI (mMRI) test. The study endpoints were to determine accuracy of BIA test in comparison to PSA, PSAD levels, and mMRI and obtain PCa prediction in candidates to prostate biopsy by BIA test. The Mann-Withney U test, the Wilkoxon rank test, and Holm-Bonferroni’s method were adopted for statistical analyses, and a computational approach was also applied to differentiate patients with PCa from those with benign disease (BPH). Results Combined DRE, TRUS, PSA, and PSAD alone failed to satisfactorily discern patients with PCa from those with BPH (62.86% of discrimination accuracy) and mMRI PIRADS ≥3 showed a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 59%. The accuracy in discerning PCa and BPH increased up to 75% by BIA test (sensitivity 63.33% and specificity 83.75%). Conclusions The BIA test is a simple, promising, cheap, and reliable test for PCa non-invasive diagnosis. The novel finger probe may improve PCa detection also in patients with low-risk PCa, thus reducing the need of useless biopsies.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00