Evaluation of a camera-based monitoring solution against regulated medical devices to measure: Heart Rate, Respiratory Rate, Oxygen Saturation, and Blood Pressure

preprint OA: gold CC-BY-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT Regular monitoring of common physiological signs, including heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation, can be an effective way to either prevent or detect several potential conditions. In particular, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are a worldwide concern. According to the World Health Organization, 31% of all deaths worldwide are from CVDs. Recently, the COVID-19 pandemic has increased the interest in remote monitoring. At present, contact devices are required to extract most of an individual’ s physiological information, which can be inconvenient for users and may cause discomfort. However, remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) technology offers a solution for this issue, which enables contactless monitoring of the blood volume pulse signal using a regular camera, and ultimately can provide the same physiological information as a contact device. In this paper we propose an evaluation of rPPG technology against medical devices in a clinical environment, with a variety of subjects in a wide range of age, height, weight, and baseline vital signs. Results have shown that rPPG technology was able to meet the initial hypothesis of mean error of +/-3 units for Heart rate, Respiration Rate, and SpO2 estimation, as well as +/-10 mmHg for Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-ND-4.0