A Leave-One-Out Algorithm for Contribution Analysis in Additive Component Network Meta-Analysis

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-06 · read from full text

This paper develops a precision-centric leave-one-out (jackknife-based) algorithm for contribution analysis in additive component network meta-analysis, aiming to address challenges from path enumeration complexity and component pathway unidentifiability. Using iterative removal of direct comparisons and inverse-variance perturbations, the authors quantify statistical leverage via a contribution matrix and apply parameter decomposition to separate direct from additive network evidence, validated with internal surrogating linear-weighting congruence checks when no prior benchmarks exist. In illustrative scenarios and a real dataset with 21 components, 40 interventions, and 66 comparisons, contribution-weighted predictions closely matched additive model estimates (Pearson r = 0.953, R² = 0.907, MAE = 0.172) with minimal coherence discrepancies (<0.1%); the authors report limitations including computational scalability and heuristic redistribution rules. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 15,412 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
A Leave-One-Out Algorithm for Contribution Analysis in Additive Component Network Meta-Analysis | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article A Leave-One-Out Algorithm for Contribution Analysis in Additive Component Network Meta-Analysis Yunhe Mao, Yiwen Shen, Qinbo Yang, Qingyang Shi, Sheyu Li This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6524959/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 07 Aug, 2025 Read the published version in BMC Medical Research Methodology → Version 1 posted 9 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background Component network meta-analysis (CNMA) enables disentangling individual treatment component effects but faces challenges in quantifying evidence contributions due to path enumeration complexity and component pathway unidentifiability. This study aims to develop a novel leave-one-out algorithm to address these limitations and enhance the interpretability of contribution metrics for individual component effects. Methods We propose a precision-centric leave-one-out algorithm grounded in jackknife principles. By iteratively removing direct comparisons and measuring inverse variance perturbations, the method quantifies statistical leverage via a contribution matrix. Parameter decomposition separates direct evidence from additive network evidence, ensuring component effects are estimated without contamination while independently weighting direct evidence. In the absence of prior benchmarks, we employed a surrogating internal validation through linear weighting to validate the congruence between contribution-weighted predictions and model-derived estimates. Results Application across illustrative scenarios demonstrated the algorithm’s utility in identifying critical comparisons that stabilize component estimates. Validation on a real dataset (21 components, 40 interventions, 66 comparisons) revealed high congruence between contribution-weighted predictions and additive model estimates: Pearson correlation r = 0.953 (p < 0.001), explained variance R² = 0.907, and mean absolute error MAE = 0.172. Coherence tests showed minimal discrepancies (< 0.1%) between combined estimates (integrating direct and additive evidence) and full model estimates. Conclusions The leave-one-out algorithm redefines contribution analysis in additive CNMA by replacing path enumeration with precision leverage quantification. It resolves unidentifiability challenges, enhances evidence transparency, and supports optimization of multi-component interventions. Limitations include computational scalability and heuristic redistribution rules, warranting future refinements. Component network meta-analysis contribution analysis leave-one-out method evidence synthesis Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 07 Aug, 2025 Read the published version in BMC Medical Research Methodology → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revision requested 16 May, 2025 Reviews received at journal 15 May, 2025 Reviews received at journal 04 May, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 03 May, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 01 May, 2025 Reviewers invited by journal 29 Apr, 2025 Editor assigned by journal 26 Apr, 2025 Submission checks completed at journal 26 Apr, 2025 First submitted to journal 24 Apr, 2025 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6524959","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":449764004,"identity":"928a8029-4a82-4123-be7e-40a2aa8585ac","order_by":0,"name":"Yunhe Mao","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Sports Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu.","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yunhe","middleName":"","lastName":"Mao","suffix":""},{"id":449764005,"identity":"69470fb2-4133-4736-b046-faad1b55577b","order_by":1,"name":"Yiwen Shen","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Hong Kong University of Science and Technology","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yiwen","middleName":"","lastName":"Shen","suffix":""},{"id":449764006,"identity":"c2c6d3c6-abb0-48b5-962d-7356dc811c22","order_by":2,"name":"Qinbo Yang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Department of Nephrology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Qinbo","middleName":"","lastName":"Yang","suffix":""},{"id":449764007,"identity":"4c7449b4-7457-4452-9aaf-166c376c31b9","order_by":3,"name":"Qingyang Shi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Groningen","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Qingyang","middleName":"","lastName":"Shi","suffix":""},{"id":449764008,"identity":"3b62a93e-b6a3-4ac0-a54e-61bb5b7826d5","order_by":4,"name":"Sheyu Li","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, MAGIC China Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Sheyu","middleName":"","lastName":"Li","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-04-25 03:53:12","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6524959/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6524959/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02619-w","type":"published","date":"2025-08-07T15:57:13+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":88814111,"identity":"360cf055-e4b5-4230-840d-162a295de4fd","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-08-11 16:07:00","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1393282,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"ALeaveOneOutApproachforContributionAnalysisinAdditiveComponentNetworkMetaAnalysis.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6524959/v1_covered_ccbf3115-bd92-4b5a-8808-263d073c9efd.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"A Leave-One-Out Algorithm for Contribution Analysis in Additive Component Network Meta-Analysis","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"bmc-medical-research-methodology","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"bmrm","sideBox":"Learn more about [BMC Medical Research Methodology](http://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/bmrm/default.aspx","title":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","twitterHandle":"BMC_series","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Component network meta-analysis, contribution analysis, leave-one-out method, evidence synthesis","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6524959/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6524959/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003ch2\u003eBackground\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eComponent network meta-analysis (CNMA) enables disentangling individual treatment component effects but faces challenges in quantifying evidence contributions due to path enumeration complexity and component pathway unidentifiability. This study aims to develop a novel leave-one-out algorithm to address these limitations and enhance the interpretability of contribution metrics for individual component effects.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eMethods\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eWe propose a precision-centric leave-one-out algorithm grounded in jackknife principles. By iteratively removing direct comparisons and measuring inverse variance perturbations, the method quantifies statistical leverage via a contribution matrix. Parameter decomposition separates direct evidence from additive network evidence, ensuring component effects are estimated without contamination while independently weighting direct evidence. In the absence of prior benchmarks, we employed a surrogating internal validation through linear weighting to validate the congruence between contribution-weighted predictions and model-derived estimates.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eResults\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eApplication across illustrative scenarios demonstrated the algorithm\u0026rsquo;s utility in identifying critical comparisons that stabilize component estimates. Validation on a real dataset (21 components, 40 interventions, 66 comparisons) revealed high congruence between contribution-weighted predictions and additive model estimates: Pearson correlation r\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.953 (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001), explained variance \u003cem\u003eR\u0026sup2;\u003c/em\u003e = 0.907, and mean absolute error MAE\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.172. Coherence tests showed minimal discrepancies (\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.1%) between combined estimates (integrating direct and additive evidence) and full model estimates.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eConclusions\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe leave-one-out algorithm redefines contribution analysis in additive CNMA by replacing path enumeration with precision leverage quantification. It resolves unidentifiability challenges, enhances evidence transparency, and supports optimization of multi-component interventions. Limitations include computational scalability and heuristic redistribution rules, warranting future refinements.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"A Leave-One-Out Algorithm for Contribution Analysis in Additive Component Network Meta-Analysis","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-04-30 11:29:29","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6524959/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2025-05-16T08:13:45+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2025-05-15T19:09:13+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2025-05-04T18:55:38+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"204766719541220368752255980007048387064","date":"2025-05-03T11:49:04+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"184686811244948082730764228838920743035","date":"2025-05-01T16:05:24+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2025-04-29T05:07:10+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2025-04-26T08:37:04+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2025-04-26T08:34:49+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","date":"2025-04-25T03:45:02+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"bmc-medical-research-methodology","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"bmrm","sideBox":"Learn more about [BMC Medical Research Methodology](http://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/bmrm/default.aspx","title":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","twitterHandle":"BMC_series","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"6ab5dae4-c254-4447-9051-63dcbb959b24","owner":[],"postedDate":"April 30th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-08-11T16:00:06+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-6524959","link":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02619-w","journal":{"identity":"bmc-medical-research-methodology","isVorOnly":false,"title":"BMC Medical Research Methodology"},"publishedOn":"2025-08-07 15:57:13","publishedOnDateReadable":"August 7th, 2025"},"versionCreatedAt":"2025-04-30 11:29:29","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1186/s12874-025-02619-w","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02619-w","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6524959","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6524959","identity":"rs-6524959","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00