Fertility preservation: state of the science and future research directions

other OA: bronze public-domain-us
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

An expert panel identified key research needs in fertility preservation, including improving techniques, understanding long-term consequences, and addressing ethical concerns for diverse at-risk populations.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify issues related to fertility preservation, discuss the state of the science, and make specific recommendations to guide future research supported by the U.S. National Institutes of Health in the field of fertility preservation. DESIGN: A 1-day meeting of an expert advisory panel convened by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development on January 23, 2007, at the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland. The panelists represented the disciplines of reproductive endocrinology and infertility, urology, neurobiology, physiology, radiation oncology, pediatrics, genetics, behavioral science, surgery, and occupational health. CONCLUSION(S): The panel members recognized the emerging focus on fertility preservation to help women and men have biological children. Among those who might benefit from research in this area are those at risk for impaired fertility or infertility, including not only cancer survivors but also others with genetic predispositions to infertility, environmental occupational exposure to hazardous substances or conditions, or reproductive diseases such as endometriosis. The panelists highlighted the need for education and awareness among health-care providers to help people understand options for preserving fertility, the need for technologic advances, the lack of data on long-term consequences of fertility preservation, and emerging ethical and social questions. This report describes the process for developing a multidisciplinary, collaborative approach for research in this area, summarizes the discussions of the panelists, and outlines the recommendations for future research.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisinfertility

MeSH descriptors

Biomedical Research Biomedical Research Fertility Infertility, Female Infertility, Female Infertility, Female Infertility, Female Infertility, Male Infertility, Male Infertility, Male Infertility, Male Female Guidelines as Topic Humans Interdisciplinary Communication Male Patient Selection Risk Factors United States

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-25T06:10:54.854274+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:14:24.299271+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine