Migrant and Native Women’s Perceptions of Prenatal Care Communication Quality: The Role of Host Country Language Proficiency

Abstract Despite the potentially significant impact of women-prenatal care provider communication quality (WPCQ) on women’s perinatal health, evidence on the determinants of those perceptions is still lacking, particularly among migrant women. We aimed to examine the effect of women’s host-country language proficiency on their perceived WPCQ. We analyzed the data of 1210 migrant and 1400 native women who gave birth at Portuguese public hospitals between 2017 and 2019 and participated in the baMBINO cohort study. Migrants’ language proficiency was self-rated. Perceived WPCQ was measured as a composite score of 9 different aspects of self-reported communication quality and ranged from 0 (always optimal) to 27. A high percentage of women (29%) rated communication quality as “always optimal”. Zero-inflated logistic regression models were fitted to estimate the association between language proficiency and perceived WPCQ, and adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRR) and odds ratio (aOR) were reported. Women’s language proficiency did not influence whether women rated WPCQ as “always optimal” or “suboptimal.” However, it did have a significant effect on the magnitude of the WPCQ score for women with a suboptimal rating. Women with full (aIRR 1.35; 95% CI 1.22–1.50), intermediate (aIRR 1.41; 95% CI 1.23–1.61), and limited (aIRR 1.72; 95% CI 1.45–2.05) language proficiencies were increasingly more likely to have lower WPCQ when compared to natives. Facilitating communication with migrant women experiencing language barriers in prenatal care could provide an important contribution to improving prenatal care quality and addressing potential subsequent disparities in perinatal health outcomes.