Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy and Its Merit in the Treatment of Female Urogenital Pain

In: Current Pain and Headache Reports · 2022 · vol. 26(10) , pp. 775–782 · doi:10.1007/s11916-022-01076-0 · PMID:36112273 · W4296038559
review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-07

Recent studies show pelvic floor physical therapy improves pain scores and function in women with certain urogenital pain diagnoses compared to no intervention or placebo.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This review article assessed the evidence for pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) in treating female urogenital pain (FUGP) by searching PubMed and the Cochrane databases for studies published between 2005 and 2022, including systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, cohorts, and case analyses. It reports that more recent studies over the prior two years found PFPT benefits for certain FUGP diagnoses, with improved pain scores and function versus no intervention or placebo. The paper’s stated caveat is that there is limited knowledge of PFPT’s scope within the medical community, which may hinder appropriate referral pathways, and the overall evidence is summarized across heterogeneous FUGP diagnoses rather than focused on a single condition. Relevance to endometriosis: the paper discusses musculoskeletal pelvic-floor contributors to chronic pelvic pain and is therefore applicable to the endometriosis-adjacent framework of pelvic pain syndromes, even though it does not explicitly focus on endometriosis or adenomyosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (30)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK