Dimension-Direct Routing: Achieving 25% Depth Improvement in Multi- Model LLM Systems via Explicit Capability Factorization

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

The paper studies an “AI managing AI” multi-model orchestration system called eVoiceClaw Desktop that uses a dimension-direct routing algorithm to automatically route cross-domain, knowledge-intensive queries to specialized LLMs, based on explicit capability factorization rather than human selection. Across four configuration iterations (V1–V4), it reports that the final V5 version achieves a 98% workflow trigger rate on 50 Chinese benchmark questions using 12 models with capped dominance by a single model (top model ≤16% usage share). Response quality is evaluated with an LLM-as-Judge approach (Claude Opus 4.6) across factual accuracy, completeness, depth, and structure, with V5 showing a 14.3% overall quality improvement and a 25.9% increase in depth, but with approximately 9× higher latency and cost as an explicit tradeoff. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit distinct capabilities across different knowledge domains, yet single-model deployments struggle with knowledge-intensive tasks requiring cross-domain reasoning. We present eVoiceClaw Desktop, a multi-model orchestration system that operationalizes an \"AI managing AI\" paradigm: instead of humans manually selecting models, the system dynamically routes complex queries to specialized models through a dimension-direct routing algorithm.\n\nThe system underwent four major configuration iterations (V1–V4), culminating in V5 that addresses critical challenges in cross-domain task allocation and semantic accumulation bias. V5 achieves a 98% workflow trigger rate across 50 benchmark questions in Chinese, leveraging 12 models with balanced diversity (top model ≤16% usage share).\n\nWe evaluate response quality using LLM-as-Judge (Claude Opus 4.6) across four dimensions: factual accuracy, completeness, depth, and structure. Compared to single-model baselines, V5 achieves a 14.3% overall quality improvement, with depth of analysis improving by 25.9%, at the expense of approximately 9× higher latency and cost.\n\nAs a meta-demonstration, the initial draft of this paper was itself generated by the system (see Appendix B).
Full text 10,399 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Dimension-Direct Routing: Achieving 25% Depth Improvement in Multi- Model LLM Systems via Explicit Capability Factorization | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Dimension-Direct Routing: Achieving 25% Depth Improvement in Multi- Model LLM Systems via Explicit Capability Factorization Tao Rui This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9317311/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit distinct capabilities across different knowledge domains, yet single-model deployments struggle with knowledge-intensive tasks requiring cross-domain reasoning. We present eVoiceClaw Desktop, a multi-model orchestration system that operationalizes an \"AI managing AI\" paradigm: instead of humans manually selecting models, the system dynamically routes complex queries to specialized models through a dimension-direct routing algorithm.\n\nThe system underwent four major configuration iterations (V1–V4), culminating in V5 that addresses critical challenges in cross-domain task allocation and semantic accumulation bias. V5 achieves a 98% workflow trigger rate across 50 benchmark questions in Chinese, leveraging 12 models with balanced diversity (top model ≤16% usage share).\n\nWe evaluate response quality using LLM-as-Judge (Claude Opus 4.6) across four dimensions: factual accuracy, completeness, depth, and structure. Compared to single-model baselines, V5 achieves a 14.3% overall quality improvement, with depth of analysis improving by 25.9%, at the expense of approximately 9× higher latency and cost.\n\nAs a meta-demonstration, the initial draft of this paper was itself generated by the system (see Appendix B). Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning LLM routing multi-model orchestration dimension-direct routing capability factorization model selection LLM-as-Judge mixture of experts semantic accumulation bias knowledge-intensive tasks AI managing AI Full Text Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-9317311","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":617391317,"identity":"bf3b937e-0ca2-406e-92ca-9bb38b5839a7","order_by":0,"name":"Tao Rui","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3898-4655","institution":"Independent Researcher","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Tao","middleName":"","lastName":"Rui","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2026-04-04 04:06:42","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":false,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false,"humanSubjectConsent":false,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9317311/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9317311/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":106404397,"identity":"a8c8f2ee-1d81-45b6-9b5d-38141c355242","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-04-08 09:15:56","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":2319398,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"eVoiceClawDesktopPaper20260402.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-9317311/v1_covered_db971055-1c91-4dec-824f-293b9abc399e.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eDimension-Direct Routing: Achieving 25% Depth Improvement in Multi- Model LLM Systems via Explicit Capability Factorization\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"Independent Researcher","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":true,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"LLM routing, multi-model orchestration, dimension-direct routing, capability factorization, model selection, LLM-as-Judge, mixture of experts, semantic accumulation bias, knowledge-intensive tasks, AI managing AI","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9317311/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9317311/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eLarge Language Models (LLMs) exhibit distinct capabilities across different knowledge domains, yet single-model deployments struggle with knowledge-intensive tasks requiring cross-domain reasoning. We present eVoiceClaw Desktop, a multi-model orchestration system that operationalizes an \\\"AI managing AI\\\" paradigm: instead of humans manually selecting models, the system dynamically routes complex queries to specialized models through a dimension-direct routing algorithm.\\n\\nThe system underwent four major configuration iterations (V1–V4), culminating in V5 that addresses critical challenges in cross-domain task allocation and semantic accumulation bias. V5 achieves a 98% workflow trigger rate across 50 benchmark questions in Chinese, leveraging 12 models with balanced diversity (top model ≤16% usage share).\\n\\nWe evaluate response quality using LLM-as-Judge (Claude Opus 4.6) across four dimensions: factual accuracy, completeness, depth, and structure. Compared to single-model baselines, V5 achieves a 14.3% overall quality improvement, with depth of analysis improving by 25.9%, at the expense of approximately 9× higher latency and cost.\\n\\nAs a meta-demonstration, the initial draft of this paper was itself generated by the system (see Appendix B).\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Dimension-Direct Routing: Achieving 25% Depth Improvement in Multi- Model LLM Systems via Explicit Capability Factorization","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-04-07 19:18:58","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9317311/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"49861f91-2e11-4601-a45a-aaf9ce8c6eb5","owner":[],"postedDate":"April 7th, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":65705734,"name":"Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-04-07T19:18:58+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-04-07 19:18:58","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-9317311","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-9317311","identity":"rs-9317311","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00