Arthroscopy and manipulation versus home therapy program in treatment of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: a prospective randomized study.

OA: closed
Full text JSON View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07+body, 2026-07-05

This prospective randomized study compared arthroscopic capsular release and manipulation to a home therapy program for adhesive capsulitis, finding both treatments to be effective.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-05 · read from full text

This prospective randomized study compared arthroscopic shoulder capsular release with manipulation versus a nonoperative home therapy program for adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder, assessing whether surgery would shorten the duration of symptoms. Both groups began an identical gentle stretching regimen immediately for 3 months, consisting of low-grade terminal range-of-motion stretches twice daily. Although 26 patients consented, final analyses included 10 in the operative group and 7 in the nonoperative group, and the study reported no statistical differences in treatment outcomes between groups. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

This study determined in a prospective manner if arthroscopic shoulder capsular release can decrease the duration of adhesive capsulitis symptoms when compared with a nonoperative home therapy program. Patients randomized to the operative group underwent arthroscopic capsular release and manipulation of the shoulder. Immediately after surgery they began the same stretching program as the nonoperative group, which consisted of terminal range of motion low-grade stretches twice daily for at least 15 minutes per session for 3 months. Twenty-six patients granted consent for the study (final analyses included 10 operative and 7 nonoperative). There were no statistical differences between the groups regarding gender, age (operative mean age, 51.5 ± 11.1 years; nonoperative mean age, 52.0 ± 6.8 years) or treatment outcome. This prospective, randomized study, which compared arthroscopic capsular release to a gentle home stretching program, demonstrated both treatment options to be effective treatment modalities.
Full text 1,475 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
James Adam Smitherman, MD; Aimee M. Struk, MEd, ATC, LAT; Mike Cricchio, OTR/L; Ginny McFadden, OTR/L; Ruth B. Dell, OTR/L; MaryBeth Horodyski, EdD, ATC; and Thomas W. Wright, MD Arthroscopy and Manipulation Versus Home Therapy Program in Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder: A Prospective Randomized Study $25.00 This study determined in a prospective manner if arthroscopic shoulder capsular release can decrease the duration of adhesive capsulitis symptoms when compared with a nonoperative home therapy program. Patients randomized to the operative group underwent arthroscopic capsular release and manipulation of the shoulder. Immediately after surgery they began the same stretching program as the nonoperative group, which consisted of terminal range of motion low-grade stretches twice daily for at least 15 minutes per session for 3 months. Twenty-six patients granted consent for the study (final analyses included 10 operative and 7 nonoperative). There were no statistical differences between the groups regarding gender, age (operative mean age, 51.5 š 11.1 years; nonoperative mean age, 52.0 š 6.8 years) or treatment outcome. This prospective, randomized study, which compared arthroscopic capsular release to a gentle home stretching program, demonstrated both treatment options to be effective treatment modalities. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 24(1):69–74, 2015) Key words: adhesive capsulitis, physical therapy, shoulder, surgery

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-13T06:13:37.491660+00:00