GenePT Revisited: Do Better Text Embeddings Make Better Gene Embeddings?
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
A bstract GenePT introduced a simple recipe for gene representations: embed each gene’s natural-language description with a general-purpose text embedding model and reuse the resulting vectors across downstream tasks. Since GenePT’s release, embedding models have improved rapidly, with many strong open and commercial encoders benchmarked on suites such as the Massive Text Embedding Benchmark (MTEB). We present a controlled “leaderboard” study that keeps the GenePT pipeline fixed and varies only the embedding backbone. We benchmark contemporary encoders on four diverse gene embedding tasks: gene–gene interaction prediction, gene property classification, cell type classification, and prediction of transcriptomic responses to unseen genetic perturbations. Across these settings, newer backbones consistently outperform the original GenePT backbone ( text-embedding-ada-002 ), achieving improvements of 1–17%, while enabling fully reproducible research by avoiding API dependencies.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00