An Information Geometry Approach to Analyzing Topic Evolution in Scientific Networks: From Physics to International Relations

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

This study presents a novel methodology for analyzing the evolution of scientific topics through the geometric framework of information spaces. Using mutual entropy-based distance metrics, the approach reveals dynamic relationships between scientific concepts over time, surpassing the capabilities of traditional keyword-based analyses. The framework quantifies the creative influence of publications linked to knowledge brokers by measuring the relative compression these agents induce on the geometry of knowledge networks. Applied to topics derived from ArXiv and JSTOR datasets, the methodology identifies patterns of topic evolution and evaluates the impact of key agents, such as publishers, journals, and countries. The findings offer actionable insights for strategic planning by academic journals, funding agencies, and research institutions, facilitating data-driven decision making to promote emerging research trends and interdisciplinary collaborations.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00