Nongynecologic Lesions Mimicking Gynecologic Diseases
This paper reviews nongynecologic pelvic masses that can mimic gynecologic diseases in female patients, including retroperitoneal tumors, bowel-related masses, and peritoneal lesions, and it outlines a high-level preoperative imaging approach. It emphasizes that diagnostic errors can be reduced by careful observation of the mass itself and its relationship to pelvic anatomy, such as showing both ovaries to suggest a nonovarian source and using Doppler US, CT, or MRI to identify vessels supplying the mass. The chapter provides examples of imaging clues, including prominent interface vessels between the uterus and a juxtauterine mass suggesting a subserosal myoma, and cranial interface vessels suggesting bowel or mesenteric origin rather than a gynecologic mass. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Full text
5,715 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 2 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
References
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
References (22)
- doi:10.2214/ajr.174.6.1741559 via openalex
- doi:10.2214/ajr.161.3.8352112 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1440-1673.1997.tb00675.x via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00261-014-0163-4 via openalex
- doi:10.1148/radiographics.19.suppl_1.g99oc15s179 via openalex
- doi:10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430170112022 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/uog.8801 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.suc.2009.09.009 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.diii.2015.07.009 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00004728-200101000-00007 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/1754-9485.13329 via openalex
- doi:10.3348/kjr.2001.2.3.164 via openalex
- doi:10.7863/jum.1995.14.12.913 via openalex
- doi:10.1148/radiology.169.1.3047785 via openalex
- doi:10.1148/rg.233025134 via openalex
- doi:10.1148/radiology.204.2.9240539 via openalex
- doi:10.7863/jum.2004.23.1.117 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/uog.4097 via openalex
- doi:10.1148/rg.323115020 via openalex
- doi:10.2214/ajr.185.3_supplement.0185s188 via openalex
- doi:10.1148/rg.245045017 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s10350-005-0122-9 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-13T18:27:55.367740+00:00