Abstract
This paper introduces the concept of HUMROBOT as a philosophical framework for analyzing the transformation of human cognition in technologically mediated societies. As artificial intelligence systems, algorithmic decision-making tools, and emerging neurotechnologies increasingly participate in human cognitive processes, the boundary between assistance and delegation becomes increasingly fragile. The paper argues that this shift threatens what is defined here as cognitive sovereignty: the capacity of individuals to retain control over their mental processes, including thought, memory, judgment, and decision-making. HUMROBOT: Cognitive Sovereignty in the Age of Algorithmic Decision-Making Rather than rejecting technological progress, HUMROBOT functions as a critical figure that highlights the ethical and social implications of cognitive hybridization. The analysis examines delegated thinking, the erosion of autonomy, and the diffusion of responsibility in algorithmically guided environments. It also explores how technological optimization may reshape freedom, identity, and moral agency without explicit coercion. By situating HUMROBOT within contemporary debates in the philosophy of technology and ethics, this paper calls for a conscious and ethically grounded approach to humanmachine integration. It emphasizes the necessity of protecting cognitive sovereignty as a condition for preserving human autonomy and dignity in the digital age.
Full text
6,397 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
HUMROBOT: Cognitive Sovereignty in the Age of Algorithmic Decision-Making | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 23 March 2026 V1 Latest version Share on HUMROBOT: Cognitive Sovereignty in the Age of Algorithmic Decision-Making Author : Bladimir Caprice 0009-0001-9813-7501 [email protected] Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/au.177429968.86896906/v1 110 views 74 downloads Contents Abstract Supplementary Material Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract This paper introduces the concept of HUMROBOT as a philosophical framework for analyzing the transformation of human cognition in technologically mediated societies. As artificial intelligence systems, algorithmic decision-making tools, and emerging neurotechnologies increasingly participate in human cognitive processes, the boundary between assistance and delegation becomes increasingly fragile. The paper argues that this shift threatens what is defined here as cognitive sovereignty: the capacity of individuals to retain control over their mental processes, including thought, memory, judgment, and decision-making. HUMROBOT: Cognitive Sovereignty in the Age of Algorithmic Decision-Making Rather than rejecting technological progress, HUMROBOT functions as a critical figure that highlights the ethical and social implications of cognitive hybridization. The analysis examines delegated thinking, the erosion of autonomy, and the diffusion of responsibility in algorithmically guided environments. It also explores how technological optimization may reshape freedom, identity, and moral agency without explicit coercion. By situating HUMROBOT within contemporary debates in the philosophy of technology and ethics, this paper calls for a conscious and ethically grounded approach to humanmachine integration. It emphasizes the necessity of protecting cognitive sovereignty as a condition for preserving human autonomy and dignity in the digital age. Supplementary Material File (humrobot concept 1.pdf) Download 338.54 KB Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 23 March 2026 Copyright This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Keywords algorithmic decision-making autonomy cognitive sovereignty human-machine integration philosophy of technology Authors Affiliations Bladimir Caprice 0009-0001-9813-7501 [email protected] View all articles by this author Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 110 views 74 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation Bladimir Caprice. HUMROBOT: Cognitive Sovereignty in the Age of Algorithmic Decision-Making . Authorea . 23 March 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.177429968.86896906/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/au.177429968.86896906/v1","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9fe0540c1f623fe2',t:'MTc3OTE2NDYyNw=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.