AuditMM: A Framework for Auditing Bias and Interpretability in Multimodal AI Systems

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Multimodal AI systems (combining text, image, audio, etc.) are increasingly used in high-stakes domains, but are under-audited for fairness, transparency, and bias amplification across modalities. We propose AuditMM, a high-level framework for systematically auditing multimodal systems: covering data, preprocessing, feature extraction & encoding, fusion, decision output, and post-deployment monitoring. AuditMM includes synthetic and counterfactual benchmarks, modality-specific and fused-model metrics, and diagnostic tools to locate sources of bias. We present a small experiment applying AuditMM on a benchmark text+image classification task, showing how fused models can amplify disparity relative to single-modality baselines, and demonstrate probing and attention-weight diagnostics. Our results indicate actionable insights for mitigation of bias in the multimodal training and auditing pipeline.
Full text 6,009 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
AuditMM: A Framework for Auditing Bias and Interpretability in Multimodal AI Systems | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 15 January 2026 V1 Latest version Share on AuditMM: A Framework for Auditing Bias and Interpretability in Multimodal AI Systems Authors : Jay Oza 0009-0002-0102-7478 [email protected] and Hrishikesh Yadav 0009-0009-9584-6714 Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176851572.28719843/v1 134 views 75 downloads Contents Abstract Supplementary Material Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract Multimodal AI systems (combining text, image, audio, etc.) are increasingly used in high-stakes domains, but are under-audited for fairness, transparency, and bias amplification across modalities. We propose AuditMM, a high-level framework for systematically auditing multimodal systems: covering data, preprocessing, feature extraction & encoding, fusion, decision output, and post-deployment monitoring. AuditMM includes synthetic and counterfactual benchmarks, modality-specific and fused-model metrics, and diagnostic tools to locate sources of bias. We present a small experiment applying AuditMM on a benchmark text+image classification task, showing how fused models can amplify disparity relative to single-modality baselines, and demonstrate probing and attention-weight diagnostics. Our results indicate actionable insights for mitigation of bias in the multimodal training and auditing pipeline. Supplementary Material File (auditmm__a_framework_for_auditing_bias_and_interpretability_in_multimodal_ai_systems (1).pdf) Download 525.11 KB Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 15 January 2026 Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License. Keywords artificial intelligence audit bias interpretability large language models multimodal Authors Affiliations Jay Oza 0009-0002-0102-7478 [email protected] View all articles by this author Hrishikesh Yadav 0009-0009-9584-6714 View all articles by this author Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 134 views 75 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation Jay Oza, Hrishikesh Yadav. AuditMM: A Framework for Auditing Bias and Interpretability in Multimodal AI Systems. Authorea . 15 January 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176851572.28719843/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/au.176851572.28719843/v1","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9fe0b7ec1ce98650',t:'MTc3OTE2ODcxOA=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-06T02:00:05.402940+00:00