Abstract
ABSTRACT Late leaf spot (LLS), caused by Nothopassalora personata , is the most damaging foliar disease in peanut production worldwide, leading to significant yield losses if not properly managed. Accurate disease severity assessment is crucial for evaluating fungicide efficacy and implementing effective management strategies. This study aimed to develop and validate an automated image analysis model, LLS-SevEst , for quantifying LLS severity in peanut leaves. A dataset of 190 scanned leaf images was analyzed using three approaches: a fixed threshold-based segmentation, morphological preprocessing, and K-means clustering. Exploratory analyses revealed distinct brightness patterns between healthy and diseased tissues, guiding the development of classification functions. The threshold-based model yielded high false positive rates due to its inability to account for natural leaf variation, while the morphological preprocessing method improved segmentation marginally but still required manual adjustments. The K-means clustering approach achieved superior segmentation by objectively differentiating healthy tissue, lesions, and background, and showed high potential for automated, reproducible disease severity estimation. Future work should focus on integrating deep learning and expanding the dataset to improve model robustness and adaptability to other foliar pathosystems.
Full text
1,465 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
ABSTRACT
Late leaf spot (LLS), caused by Nothopassalora personata, is the most damaging foliar disease in peanut production worldwide, leading to significant yield losses if not properly managed. Accurate disease severity assessment is crucial for evaluating fungicide efficacy and implementing effective management strategies. This study aimed to develop and validate an automated image analysis model, LLS-SevEst, for quantifying LLS severity in peanut leaves. A dataset of 190 scanned leaf images was analyzed using three approaches: a fixed threshold-based segmentation, morphological preprocessing, and K-means clustering. Exploratory analyses revealed distinct brightness patterns between healthy and diseased tissues, guiding the development of classification functions. The threshold-based model yielded high false positive rates due to its inability to account for natural leaf variation, while the morphological preprocessing method improved segmentation marginally but still required manual adjustments. The K-means clustering approach achieved superior segmentation by objectively differentiating healthy tissue, lesions, and background, and showed high potential for automated, reproducible disease severity estimation. Future work should focus on integrating deep learning and expanding the dataset to improve model robustness and adaptability to other foliar pathosystems.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.