Reconceptualizing Audit Quality in Emerging Markets: An Institutional and Corporate Governance Perspective with Evidence from Indonesia

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-04 · read from full text

This paper reconceptualizes audit quality in emerging markets as a governance outcome rather than a result of firm-level characteristics, using an institutional and corporate governance lens. It performs a qualitative meta-synthesis of 54 Scopus-indexed empirical studies (2020–2025) and analyzes Indonesia as a critical case where regulatory reform and digital transformation occur concurrently, identifying five interrelated domains: auditor independence, audit firm capacity, audit tenure, institutional enforcement, and digital audit adoption. The analysis finds that traditional audit-quality determinants remain relevant but operate conditionally within broader governance configurations, with institutional enforcement as a key moderating mechanism and digital audit technologies enabling transparency, risk detection, and procedural accountability—though their effectiveness depends on institutional integration and regulatory support. This paper is not explicitly biomedical and has no stated limitations beyond being a qualitative meta-synthesis of published studies, and it is included here via corpus indexing rather than any direct mention of endometriosis or adenomyosis. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract This study reconceptualizes audit quality as a governance outcome shaped by institutional capacity and digital transformation in emerging markets. While prior research predominantly conceptualizes audit quality as a function of firm-level attributes, such an approach offers limited explanatory power in contexts characterized by fragmented regulatory enforcement and evolving governance systems. Addressing this gap, this study adopts an institutional and corporate governance perspective to examine how audit quality is produced within complex governance environments. Drawing on a qualitative meta-synthesis of 54 Scopus-indexed empirical studies published between 2020 and 2025, this paper analyzes the Indonesian context as a critical case of an emerging market undergoing simultaneous regulatory reform and digital transformation. Guided by agency theory, institutional theory, and digital governance perspectives, the analysis identifies five interrelated domains influencing audit quality: auditor independence, audit firm capacity, audit tenure, institutional enforcement, and digital audit adoption. The findings reveal that traditional audit quality determinants remain relevant but operate conditionally within broader governance configurations. Institutional enforcement emerges as a central moderating mechanism, while digital audit technologies function as governance enablers that enhance transparency, risk detection, and procedural accountability. However, their effectiveness depends on the degree of institutional integration and regulatory support, highlighting the limits of technology-driven approaches in weak governance environments. By positioning audit quality as an institutional–digital governance system, this study contributes to the corporate governance and accountability literature in three ways. First, it advances a configurational understanding of audit quality beyond linear determinant models. Second, it integrates digital governance into the analysis of auditing as a core accountability mechanism. Third, it provides policy-relevant insights for regulators, professional bodies, and audit firms seeking to strengthen governance and assurance systems in emerging markets.
Full text 11,693 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Reconceptualizing Audit Quality in Emerging Markets: An Institutional and Corporate Governance Perspective with Evidence from Indonesia | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Reconceptualizing Audit Quality in Emerging Markets: An Institutional and Corporate Governance Perspective with Evidence from Indonesia Adli Adli This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9329048/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract This study reconceptualizes audit quality as a governance outcome shaped by institutional capacity and digital transformation in emerging markets. While prior research predominantly conceptualizes audit quality as a function of firm-level attributes, such an approach offers limited explanatory power in contexts characterized by fragmented regulatory enforcement and evolving governance systems. Addressing this gap, this study adopts an institutional and corporate governance perspective to examine how audit quality is produced within complex governance environments. Drawing on a qualitative meta-synthesis of 54 Scopus-indexed empirical studies published between 2020 and 2025, this paper analyzes the Indonesian context as a critical case of an emerging market undergoing simultaneous regulatory reform and digital transformation. Guided by agency theory, institutional theory, and digital governance perspectives, the analysis identifies five interrelated domains influencing audit quality: auditor independence, audit firm capacity, audit tenure, institutional enforcement, and digital audit adoption. The findings reveal that traditional audit quality determinants remain relevant but operate conditionally within broader governance configurations. Institutional enforcement emerges as a central moderating mechanism, while digital audit technologies function as governance enablers that enhance transparency, risk detection, and procedural accountability. However, their effectiveness depends on the degree of institutional integration and regulatory support, highlighting the limits of technology-driven approaches in weak governance environments. By positioning audit quality as an institutional–digital governance system, this study contributes to the corporate governance and accountability literature in three ways. First, it advances a configurational understanding of audit quality beyond linear determinant models. Second, it integrates digital governance into the analysis of auditing as a core accountability mechanism. Third, it provides policy-relevant insights for regulators, professional bodies, and audit firms seeking to strengthen governance and assurance systems in emerging markets. audit quality corporate governance institutional theory digital governance regulatory enforcement emerging markets Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-9329048","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":621188064,"identity":"16a0e6c8-a949-4e59-bec3-f66aef0ab203","order_by":0,"name":"Adli Adli","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Mercu Buana University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Adli","middleName":"","lastName":"Adli","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2026-04-06 01:53:31","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9329048/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9329048/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":106915107,"identity":"87c187df-87d2-4d1f-90df-2c33c1d4c08f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-04-14 17:46:30","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":348910,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"ReconceptualizingAuditQualityinEmergingMarketsAdli.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-9329048/v1_covered_ed82627c-504d-4078-b463-0d470dd248fe.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Reconceptualizing Audit Quality in Emerging Markets: An Institutional and Corporate Governance Perspective with Evidence from Indonesia","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"audit quality, corporate governance, institutional theory, digital governance, regulatory enforcement, emerging markets","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9329048/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9329048/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"This study reconceptualizes audit quality as a governance outcome shaped by institutional capacity and digital transformation in emerging markets. While prior research predominantly conceptualizes audit quality as a function of firm-level attributes, such an approach offers limited explanatory power in contexts characterized by fragmented regulatory enforcement and evolving governance systems. Addressing this gap, this study adopts an institutional and corporate governance perspective to examine how audit quality is produced within complex governance environments.\nDrawing on a qualitative meta-synthesis of 54 Scopus-indexed empirical studies published between 2020 and 2025, this paper analyzes the Indonesian context as a critical case of an emerging market undergoing simultaneous regulatory reform and digital transformation. Guided by agency theory, institutional theory, and digital governance perspectives, the analysis identifies five interrelated domains influencing audit quality: auditor independence, audit firm capacity, audit tenure, institutional enforcement, and digital audit adoption.\nThe findings reveal that traditional audit quality determinants remain relevant but operate conditionally within broader governance configurations. Institutional enforcement emerges as a central moderating mechanism, while digital audit technologies function as governance enablers that enhance transparency, risk detection, and procedural accountability. However, their effectiveness depends on the degree of institutional integration and regulatory support, highlighting the limits of technology-driven approaches in weak governance environments.\nBy positioning audit quality as an institutional–digital governance system, this study contributes to the corporate governance and accountability literature in three ways. First, it advances a configurational understanding of audit quality beyond linear determinant models. Second, it integrates digital governance into the analysis of auditing as a core accountability mechanism. Third, it provides policy-relevant insights for regulators, professional bodies, and audit firms seeking to strengthen governance and assurance systems in emerging markets.","manuscriptTitle":"Reconceptualizing Audit Quality in Emerging Markets: An Institutional and Corporate Governance Perspective with Evidence from Indonesia","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-04-14 17:46:21","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9329048/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"7c9686b0-dd71-4cc8-989a-d901ca4e60bf","owner":[],"postedDate":"April 14th, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-04-14T17:46:21+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-04-14 17:46:21","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-9329048","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-9329048","identity":"rs-9329048","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-06T02:00:05.402940+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0