The influence of source decay on BED in2 high dose rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer : considering different tumor cell lines and normal tissues

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study focuses on the influence of intra-fraction DNA dam-15 age repair and cellular re-population on biologically effective dose (BED) cased by the source decay at different time points in a source exchange cycle , in order to examine the effect of source decay for different tumor cell lines and normal tissues in Ir192 high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) for cervical cancer. METHODS: 24 patients who accepted HDR BT were chosen in this study. Radiobiological parameters of T1/2, Tk, Tp and α/β from the recommendations of the AAPM TG137 and ICRU89 then were considered in a new full form BED formula, which was used to replaced the common simplified formula that ignore the intrafraction repair and interfraction repair as well as the repopulation. Fraction times were normalized to require 4.26.6 min for 78 Gy prescription dose of plans at 10 Ci of sources activities according to the different clinical tumour volumes in HDR BT (HRCTVs). Calculations of different BED values were carried out in HRCTVs about two commonly clinical classifications and nine cervical cell lines according the different values of α/β and BED formulas respectively. Organs at risk (OARs) were also statistically analyzed, as well as the duration of each treatment have been recorded. RESULTS: Compared to the simplified BED formula based values (BED), the full form formula based BED values (BEDg) showed significant difference, which were decreased more and more obviously with the source decay from 10 Ci to 2Ci in cervical cancer patients. With the α/β value of 10 for tumour, the maximum percent values (%) of changing BED(∆BED = BED-BEDg) by two formulas (Gy, x±s) for the source activity were 3.05 ± 0.47,and 2.415 ± 0.38 in D90% and D100% in HRCTV, respectively. Focusing on the clinical classifications and cell lines, the top first three percent values of ∆BED over 5Gy were 14.06±1.67 and 11.08±1.43; 9.92±1.19 and 7.51±1.01; 7.57±1.05 and 5.90±0.87 in D90% and D100% for HRCTV with the α/β values of 10.00 (stage I and II cervix carcinoma), 16.46 (HX156c), 11.40 (HX155c). The similar results also showed in OARs, that with source decay, the maximum percent values of ∆BED (α/β = 3) in bladder was 13.37±2.27 at D0.1cc; in the rectum was 11.92±2.10 at D0.1cc; in the sigmoid and small intestine bowel were 12.45±2.27 and 11.91±2.62 at D0.1cc, respectively. The duration of each treatment fraction also had a positive correlation with the source decay. With the source activity decay, the treatment time has changed obviously, which was from 5-8 minutes (10 Ci) to 27-33 minutes(2 Ci). Conclusion: This study confirmed that the source delay has a great effect on the BED of the cervical cancer tissue with different cell lines and the normal tissues. The full form BED considering repair and repopulation can more accurate assessment of absorbed dose in the HDR BT for cervical cancer, especially for the hyper fraction schemes with single fraction dose at the 2Ci source in HDR BT. The simplified BED calculation that dose not take into account the source activity may not be appropriate in the HDR BT of cervical cancer.
Full text 15,244 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
The influence of source decay on BED in2 high dose rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer : considering different tumor cell lines and normal tissues | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article The influence of source decay on BED in2 high dose rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer : considering different tumor cell lines and normal tissues Suyan Bi, Jiaomei Zhou, Meiling Xu, Zhitao Dai This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3989470/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract OBJECTIVE: This study focuses on the influence of intra-fraction DNA dam-15 age repair and cellular re-population on biologically effective dose (BED) cased by the source decay at different time points in a source exchange cycle , in order to examine the effect of source decay for different tumor cell lines and normal tissues in Ir192 high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) for cervical cancer. METHODS: 24 patients who accepted HDR BT were chosen in this study. Radiobiological parameters of T1/2, Tk, Tp and α/β from the recommendations of the AAPM TG137 and ICRU89 then were considered in a new full form BED formula, which was used to replaced the common simplified formula that ignore the intrafraction repair and interfraction repair as well as the repopulation. Fraction times were normalized to require 4.26.6 min for 78 Gy prescription dose of plans at 10 Ci of sources activities according to the different clinical tumour volumes in HDR BT (HRCTVs). Calculations of different BED values were carried out in HRCTVs about two commonly clinical classifications and nine cervical cell lines according the different values of α/β and BED formulas respectively. Organs at risk (OARs) were also statistically analyzed, as well as the duration of each treatment have been recorded. RESULTS: Compared to the simplified BED formula based values (BED), the full form formula based BED values (BEDg) showed significant difference, which were decreased more and more obviously with the source decay from 10 Ci to 2Ci in cervical cancer patients. With the α/β value of 10 for tumour, the maximum percent values (%) of changing BED(∆BED = BED-BEDg) by two formulas (Gy, x±s) for the source activity were 3.05 ± 0.47,and 2.415 ± 0.38 in D90% and D100% in HRCTV, respectively. Focusing on the clinical classifications and cell lines, the top first three percent values of ∆BED over 5Gy were 14.06±1.67 and 11.08±1.43; 9.92±1.19 and 7.51±1.01; 7.57±1.05 and 5.90±0.87 in D90% and D100% for HRCTV with the α/β values of 10.00 (stage I and II cervix carcinoma), 16.46 (HX156c), 11.40 (HX155c). The similar results also showed in OARs, that with source decay, the maximum percent values of ∆BED (α/β = 3) in bladder was 13.37±2.27 at D0.1cc; in the rectum was 11.92±2.10 at D0.1cc; in the sigmoid and small intestine bowel were 12.45±2.27 and 11.91±2.62 at D0.1cc, respectively. The duration of each treatment fraction also had a positive correlation with the source decay. With the source activity decay, the treatment time has changed obviously, which was from 5-8 minutes (10 Ci) to 27-33 minutes(2 Ci). Conclusion: This study confirmed that the source delay has a great effect on the BED of the cervical cancer tissue with different cell lines and the normal tissues. The full form BED considering repair and repopulation can more accurate assessment of absorbed dose in the HDR BT for cervical cancer, especially for the hyper fraction schemes with single fraction dose at the 2Ci source in HDR BT. The simplified BED calculation that dose not take into account the source activity may not be appropriate in the HDR BT of cervical cancer. High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR BT) source decay cervical cancer Intrafraction repair Biological effective dose calculations (BED) Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-3989470","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":275344897,"identity":"701642a9-d3da-47b9-9287-cd1351767f19","order_by":0,"name":"Suyan Bi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, Kubang Kerian, , 16150, Kelantan , Malaysia","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Suyan","middleName":"","lastName":"Bi","suffix":""},{"id":275344898,"identity":"4921f20a-8d1d-4d00-8f4f-f5cb0f4f3788","order_by":1,"name":"Jiaomei Zhou","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital Shenzhen Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jiaomei","middleName":"","lastName":"Zhou","suffix":""},{"id":275344899,"identity":"14612467-66fc-4374-bfce-442099942cf9","order_by":2,"name":"Meiling Xu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital Shenzhen Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Meiling","middleName":"","lastName":"Xu","suffix":""},{"id":275344900,"identity":"fcadda41-3fc1-4666-b1a0-c8f429dc8fe8","order_by":3,"name":"Zhitao Dai","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital Shenzhen Hospital","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Zhitao","middleName":"","lastName":"Dai","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-02-26 01:30:08","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3989470/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3989470/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":52775671,"identity":"a17fb218-4454-4b11-9155-c275648e5197","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-03-15 15:37:51","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":2484807,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"radiationoncologyHDR.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3989470/v1_covered_1ef2f18e-239f-4e3b-8803-46c263cc0b3f.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"The influence of source decay on BED in2 high dose rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer : considering different tumor cell lines and normal tissues","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR BT), source decay, cervical cancer, Intrafraction repair, Biological effective dose calculations (BED)","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3989470/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3989470/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOBJECTIVE:\u003c/strong\u003e This study focuses on the influence of intra-fraction DNA dam-15 age repair and cellular re-population on biologically effective dose (BED) cased by the source decay at different time points in a source exchange cycle , in order to examine the effect of source decay for different tumor cell lines and normal\u0026nbsp; tissues in Ir192 high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) for cervical cancer.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMETHODS:\u003c/strong\u003e 24 patients who accepted HDR BT were chosen in this study. Radiobiological parameters of T1/2, Tk, Tp and α/β from the recommendations of the AAPM TG137 and ICRU89 then were considered in a new full form BED formula, which was used to replaced the common simplified formula that ignore the intrafraction repair and interfraction repair as well as the repopulation. Fraction times were normalized to require 4.26.6 min for 78 Gy prescription dose of plans at 10 Ci of sources activities according to the different clinical tumour volumes in HDR BT (HRCTVs). Calculations of different BED values were carried out in HRCTVs about two commonly clinical classifications and nine cervical cell lines according the different values of α/β and BED formulas respectively. Organs at risk (OARs) were also statistically analyzed, as well as the duration of each treatment have been recorded.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRESULTS:\u003c/strong\u003e Compared to the simplified BED formula based values (BED), the full form formula based BED values (BEDg) showed significant difference, which were decreased more and more obviously with the source decay from 10 Ci to 2Ci in cervical cancer patients. With the α/β value of 10 for tumour, the maximum percent values (%) of changing BED(∆BED = BED-BEDg) by two formulas (Gy, x±s) for the source activity were 3.05 ± 0.47,and 2.415 ± 0.38 in D90% and D100% in HRCTV, respectively. Focusing on the clinical classifications and cell lines, the top first three percent values of ∆BED over 5Gy were 14.06±1.67 and 11.08±1.43; 9.92±1.19 and 7.51±1.01; 7.57±1.05 and 5.90±0.87 in D90% and D100% for HRCTV with the α/β values of 10.00 (stage I and II cervix carcinoma), 16.46 (HX156c), 11.40 (HX155c). The similar results also showed in OARs, that with source decay, the maximum percent values of ∆BED (α/β = 3) in bladder was 13.37±2.27 at D0.1cc; in the rectum was 11.92±2.10 at D0.1cc; in the sigmoid and small intestine bowel were 12.45±2.27 and 11.91±2.62 at D0.1cc, respectively. The duration of each treatment fraction also had a positive correlation with the source decay. With the source activity decay, the treatment time has changed obviously, which was from 5-8 minutes (10 Ci) to 27-33 minutes(2 Ci).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConclusion:\u003c/strong\u003e This study confirmed that the source delay has a great effect on the BED of the cervical cancer tissue with different cell lines and the normal tissues. The full form BED considering repair and repopulation can more accurate assessment of absorbed dose in the HDR BT for cervical cancer, especially for the hyper fraction schemes with single fraction dose at the 2Ci source in HDR BT. The simplified BED calculation that dose not take into account the source activity may not be appropriate in the HDR BT of cervical cancer. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"The influence of source decay on BED in2 high dose rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer : considering different tumor cell lines and normal tissues","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-03-01 02:51:40","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3989470/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"bd21b3ca-7e54-4505-8215-14095ac00375","owner":[],"postedDate":"March 1st, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2024-03-15T15:29:43+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2024-03-01 02:51:40","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-3989470","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-3989470","identity":"rs-3989470","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-06T02:00:05.402940+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0