Scoring information integration with statistical quality control enhanced cross-run analysis of data-independent acquisition proteomics data

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,262 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract The peptide-centric strategy is widely applied in data-independent acquisition (DIA) proteomics to analyze multiplexed MS2 spectra. However, current software tools often rely on single-run data for peptide peak identification, leading to inconsistent quantification across heterogeneous datasets. Match-between-runs (MBR) algorithms address this by aligning peaks or elution profiles across runs post-analysis but they are often ad-hoc and lack statistical frameworks for controlling peak quality, resulting in false positives and reduced quantitative reproducibility. Here we present DreamDIAlignR, a cross-run peptide-centric tool that integrates peptide elution behavior across runs with a deep learning peak identifier and signal alignment algorithm for consistent peak picking and FDR-controlled scoring. DreamDIAlignR outperformed state-of-the-art MBR methods, identifying up to 25.6% more quantitatively changing proteins on a benchmark dataset and 38.5% more on a cancer dataset. Additionally, DreamDIAlignR establishes an improved methodology for performing MBR compatible with existing DIA analysis tools, thereby enhancing the overall quality of DIA analysis. Competing Interest Statement R.Y. and W.Y. are shareholders of Aginome Scientific.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-06T02:00:05.402940+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0