Faith-based Affirmative Action for Environmental Conservation: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan

Faith-based Affirmative Action for Environmental Conservation: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Faith-based Affirmative Action for Environmental Conservation: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan Abida Sharif, Imran Sabir, Inayat Ali, Aneeqa Ansari This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7944181/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Faith-based approaches are increasingly viewed as more effective than secular ones in shaping pro-environmental behaviors and attitudes. As industrialization and development projects accelerate, environmental degradation intensifies, prompting new strategies for sustainable development. One such strategy is the use of faith-based affirmative action programs that engage religious communities in environmental initiatives through targeted education and outreach. Pakistan, despite having one of the world’s largest Muslim populations and facing severe environmental challenges, has seen limited research on the intersection of faith and environmental conservation. This study addresses that gap by presenting empirical findings from a field-based research project conducted near Islamabad. Using various models, the study assesses whether religious belief influences community action, specifically in managing household solid waste. Findings indicate that faith significantly encourages positive environmental attitudes and active community participation. Field data further supports the conclusion that religiously framed programs can successfully mobilize communities for conservation. These results highlight the potential of faith-based affirmative action as a valuable policy tool for promoting sustainability, particularly in culturally and religiously rooted societies like Pakistan. Sociology Anthropology Environmental Policy Faith Environment behavior Affirmative Action Climate Change Introduction The significance of environmental conservation has never been more pertinent. As we find ourselves in the Anthropocene, a geological epoch defined by the significant global impact humans have on the Earth's ecosystems, there is a pressing need to reassess our relationship with the natural world (Lewis & Maslin, 2015 ; Steffen et al., 2011 ). Unfortunately, the rapid industrialization and unchecked development projects across the globe have increasingly put pressure on our natural environment, accelerating climate change, loss of biodiversity, and pollution (Corlett, 2017 ; IPBES, 2019; IPCC, 2014). Given the scale of the challenges we face, traditional top-down approaches to environmental management and conservation have proven inadequate (Leach et al., 2010 ; UNEP, 2021 ). In response, there has been a surge of interest in grassroots movements and community-based conservation initiatives, leading researchers to explore new pathways towards sustainable development (Berkes, 2007 ). Among such pathways, the role of faith and belief in environmental conservation has emerged as a subject of particular interest. Religion, with its profound influence on human behavior and values, is increasingly being recognized as a critical factor in shaping people's attitudes towards the environment (Garrard et al., 2013 ). Faith-based affirmative action for environmental conservation represents a novel approach to environmental stewardship, uniquely merging the tenets of religious faith with the principles of environmental conservation. Underpinning this approach is the recognition of the profound influence religious beliefs exert on the attitudes and behaviours of individuals and communities (Bauman, 2014 ). Traditionally, affirmative action policies have been employed to rectify social injustices and economic disparities by providing preferential treatment to marginalized or disadvantaged groups in areas such as education and employment (Bowen & Bok, 2016 ). In the realm of environmental conservation, however, affirmative action programs take on a slightly different character. Rather than addressing economic or social imbalances, these initiatives aim to foster environmental stewardship and sustainable practices among faith communities (Veldman et al., 2013 ). A considerable body of literature suggests that faith-based approaches can be more effective than non-faith approaches in promoting environmental conservation in developing countries (Austin et al., 2018 ; Baruth & Wilcox, 2013 ; Bauman, 2014 ; Bhagwat, Ormsby, & Rutte, 2011 ; Cochrane, 2013 ; van der Ploeg et al., 2011 ). This approach is underscored by the premise that religious faith, deeply ingrained in many societies, can inspire and motivate individuals and communities to take affirmative action towards environmental conservation (Taylor, 2016 ; Tomalin, 2019). These faith-based initiatives are proactive in their orientation and strive to enact measurable change. They aim to effect positive environmental behaviour and promote sustainable practices by engaging religious groups in educational and outreach activities tailored to their beliefs and values (Hitzhusen & Tucker, 2013 ). The assumption is that religious faith, deeply ingrained in many societies, can provide the moral imperative to inspire and motivate individuals and communities to take action for environmental conservation (Jenkins & Chapple, 2011 ). While there has been an increased interest in examining the interplay between faith and environmental conservation globally, a conspicuous gap remains in the literature concerning the impact and effectiveness of faith-based affirmative action programs in specific cultural and socio-economic contexts (Bauman, 2014 ). The potential of faith-based affirmative action for environmental conservation has been under-explored in developing countries where faith plays a crucial role in shaping societal values and behaviours (Veldman et al., 2014), particularly in the area of solid waste management (Hoornweg & Bhada-Tata, 2012 ). Despite having one of the largest Muslim populations in the world living in severe environmental conditions, the role of faith in environmental conservation in Pakistan has been under-studied. Given the overarching impact of religion on societal values and behaviours (Norenzayan & Shariff, 2008 ), faith-based affirmative action is considered a promising avenue to promote environmental conservation and sustainable development (Veldman et al., 2014). Given the urgency of the environmental crisis and the potential of faith-based approaches to inspire action, it is critical to investigate this relationship further. The research paper pays attention to the effectiveness of faith-based affirmative action in promoting environmental conservation in Pakistan, a country marked by its deep-seated religiosity and daunting environmental challenges. This study emerges from a recognition of the dearth of research focusing on the interplay of faith and environmentalism within the context of developing nations, particularly in relation to waste management. It particularly explores the influence of faith and belief on people's attitudes and behaviours towards household solid waste management in Pakistan. It further deals with the impact of faith-based affirmative action on community participation in household solid waste management. And what is the relationship between faith-based affirmative action and attitudes towards environmental conservation among religious people. Literature Review Several studies been dedicated to examining the intricate relationship between environmental conservation and sustainable development (Adams, 2006 ; Beder, 2000 ; Giddings, Hopwood, & O'Brien, 2002 ). In the discourse of sustainable development, environmental conservation is not merely seen as an addendum but a pivotal cornerstone (Redclift, 2005 ). Turner ( 1995 ) postulates that a sustainable future cannot be envisioned without robust environmental conservation policies, thereby underscoring the interconnectedness of the two concepts. Human activities, principally driven by economic objectives, often lead to extensive environmental degradation (Grossman & Krueger, 1995 ; Stern, 2004 ). Industrial pollution, deforestation, and overconsumption of resources have accelerated the rate of environmental degradation, threatening the planet's ecological balance (Goudie, 2018 ; Rees, 2018 ; Vitousek, Mooney, Lubchenco, & Melillo, 1997 ). In particular, Le Quéré et al. ( 2018 ) and Tukker and Jansen ( 2006 ) shed light on the distressing impact of human-induced carbon emissions on climate change and biodiversity loss. On the flip side, sustainable development and environmental conservation hold the promise to counteract these deleterious impacts. They offer an integrative framework that merges economic growth with environmental stewardship, effectively arguing for a shift from resource-intensive to sustainable practices (Holden, Linnerud, & Banister, 2017 ; Mebratu, 1998 ). Embracing such a framework, according to Pearce, Markandya, and Barbier ( 1989 ), offers the potential to retard, and potentially reverse, the rate of environmental degradation. Ekins and colleagues ( 2003 ) posit that the principle of 'strong sustainability,' which emphasizes maintaining the total stock of capital, including natural capital, is a vital strategy to ensure long-term environmental health. Moreover, Folke and colleagues ( 2002 ) and Berkes, Colding, and Folke ( 2008 ) argue that an ecosystem-based approach to sustainable development is key to enhancing resilience and adaptive capacity in the face of environmental stressors. However, there is a perceived dichotomy between environmental conservation goals and sustainable development, a tension that demands further investigation (Vucetich & Nelson, 2010 ). The debate is not merely academic; it has serious implications for policy-making and the trajectory of our collective future (Brand, 2005 ). The current body of literature propounds the idea that while we cannot reverse all the harm done, a strong commitment to sustainable development and environmental conservation could chart a course towards a more resilient and sustainable future. Thus, understanding the symbiotic relationship between these two constructs is paramount for policymakers, environmentalists, and society at large. Therein lies the purpose of the present study: to offer a nuanced understanding of these entwined facets of our societal and environmental existence. Faith-based Approaches to Environmental Conservation In the quest for environmental sustainability, faith-based perspectives and actions have frequently emerged as notable actors (Gardner, 2006 ; Taylor, 2010 ). Scholars such as Kearns ( 1997 ) argue that religious communities are crucial for mobilizing action towards environmental conservation. Conversely, this potential is sometimes unheeded, with faith-based environmental initiatives receiving scant attention in mainstream environmental discourses (Wardekker et al., 2009 ). Research has shown that the infusion of faith-based teachings can catalyze environmental awareness and conservation efforts. In particular, the concept of "stewardship," prominent in many religious traditions, emphasizes the responsibility of humans to protect and conserve the Earth (Van Huijstee et al., 2007 ). For instance, Christian principles of stewardship were demonstrated to significantly motivate individual environmental behaviors (Hand & Van Liere, 1984 ), while Islamic teachings of "khalifah" (stewardship) have been instrumental in promoting environmental awareness and conservation within Muslim communities (Khalid & O’Brien, 1992). Beyond individual motivations, faith communities can serve as pivotal societal actors for environmental sustainability. The Catholic Church's Encyclical "Laudato Si" provides a salient example, with Pope Francis urging for an "ecological conversion" to address the environmental crisis (Bergoglio, 2015 ). This call to action not only stirred Catholics but also fostered dialogue on environmental conservation in broader societal and interfaith contexts (Cook et al., 2016 ; Jenkins, 2009 ). However, faith-based conservation approaches are not without their challenges. Some scholars argue that religious beliefs can also contribute to environmental degradation (White, 1967 ), an assertion that has incited heated debates (Eckberg & Blocker, 1989 ). To this end, Callicott ( 1989 ) points out that the instrumentalization of religious principles for environmental ends may lead to "faith-washing," where faith is merely utilized as a tool to support pre-existing environmental agendas. The complex relationship between faith and environmental conservation is further nuanced when considering sociopolitical factors. Veldman and colleagues ( 2013 ) found that political conservatism among religious groups in the United States, for example, can correlate with climate change skepticism, highlighting the intersectionality of religious, political, and environmental beliefs. The influence of faith-based initiatives on environmental conservation is a vibrant field of study, one that begs further exploration and greater recognition within the larger narrative of environmental conservation. Successes and Challenges of Faith-based Affirmative Action Programs for Environmental Conservation In the contemporary discourse on environmental conservation, scholars and practitioners alike have turned their attention towards the potential of faith-based affirmative action programs. Robina & Fernandez (2018) found that religious institutions can exercise considerable influence over their adherents' attitudes towards the environment, thereby promoting sustainable practices. Meanwhile, Harris ( 2008 ) observed that faith communities often embody values of stewardship, which can translate into active conservation efforts. Notably, these programs have reported numerous successes. For instance, faith-based organizations have been instrumental in local conservation and reforestation initiatives (Palmer & Finlay, 2003 ; Kellert & Wilson, 1995 ). Further, Tirosh-Samuelson ( 2002 ) demonstrated that interfaith collaborations can significantly amplify the reach and impact of environmental initiatives, promoting cross-cultural understanding and collective action. Indeed, faith-based action has shown potential to foster community-led conservation efforts (Chandler, 2004 ; Chapple, 2006 ). However, the effectiveness of faith-based affirmative action programs in environmental conservation is not without debate. Several researchers have raised concerns over the inconsistency of these programs. Some studies, such as those conducted by Kearns ( 1997 ), indicate that although religious teachings may promote environmental stewardship, this does not always translate into meaningful action on the ground. In contrast, others, like Taylor and Van Wieren ( 2016 ), posit that religious worldviews can sometimes contribute to anthropocentric perspectives and exacerbate environmental degradation. Furthermore, the intersection of faith-based affirmative action and environmental conservation presents unique challenges. As observed by Foltz ( 2003 ), some faith-based organizations may face resistance from their constituents for engaging in activities outside their traditional remit, such as environmental conservation. Gerten and Bergmann ( 2012 ) added that navigating the intricate relationships between religious doctrines, institutional practices, and environmental beliefs can often be a challenging endeavor. Despite these challenges, faith-based affirmative action programs hold promise in the environmental conservation landscape. However, there is a pressing need for more nuanced research on this subject. What does the available literature suggest about the mechanisms through which these programs can optimize their impact on environmental conservation? How can these programs navigate the challenges inherent in melding religious and environmental agendas? Answers to these questions could greatly enhance our understanding of the role faith-based affirmative action programs can play in environmental conservation. In sum, the study of faith-based affirmative action in environmental conservation is ripe with complexities. It presents a mosaic of promising triumphs interspersed with significant challenges. The task for scholars and practitioners is to carefully untangle these threads, thereby unearthing pathways towards more effective faith-based environmental stewardship. Role of Faith in Environmental Conservation in the Developing World Over the past few decades, a significant body of literature has explored the intricate connection between faith-based communities and environmental conservation, particularly in the developing world. This analysis begins with understanding the potency of faith in shaping human behaviors and attitudes, not excluding environmental stewardship (Sponsel, 2012 ; Dudley, Higgins-Zogib, & Mansourian, 2009 ). A key underpinning lies in the assertion that faith-based communities harbor significant potential for steering environmental conservation due to their extensive influence and reach, especially in developing countries (Bhagwat, Dudley, & Harrop, 2011 ; Palmer & Finlay, 2003 ). In a prominent study, Bhagwat, Dudley, & Harrop ( 2011 ) posited that in many developing societies, faith and spirituality remain the main social fabric connecting people, where religious teachings often play an instrumental role in shaping their actions towards the environment. This sentiment was echoed by Colding and Folke ( 2001 ), who identified that sacred groves, linked with religious customs, have played a vital role in conserving biodiversity in various parts of the developing world. Similarly, Verschuuren et al., ( 2010 ) cited numerous examples of sacred sites serving as unofficial nature reserves, thereby nurturing environmental sustainability. Conversely, some scholars critique faith-based environmental conservation as overly simplistic, arguing that it does not fully account for the intricate socio-cultural, political, and economic factors in these regions (Tomalin, 2002 ). Still, there is an emerging consensus that faith-based environmental conservation can be integrated with scientific and policy-based approaches to make a more holistic and effective conservation strategy. Such integration, however, requires a thorough understanding of how faith-based practices can harmonize with secular environmental principles (Gardner, 2002 ; Palmer & Finlay, 2003 ). Case studies illustrate this point. In a study focused on African traditional religions, Sheridan ( 2008 ) showed how belief systems led to the successful conservation of forests in Tanzania. Similarly, studies from the Mekong region demonstrated how Buddhist monastic communities have taken active roles in forest preservation, relying on religious teachings to foster environmental consciousness (Cui et al., 2022 ; Sponsel, 2012 ). A Hindu faith-based initiative in India showed a similar trajectory, where sacred groves contributed to local biodiversity conservation (Malhotra, 2008 ). Despite these successful narratives, faith-based environmental conservation is not without challenges. Tomalin ( 2007 ; 2009 ) highlighted the issue of contradictions within religious doctrines that may sometimes promote exploitation of nature. Moreover, religious institutions might face difficulties in navigating the terrain between spiritual and environmental mandates (Wardekker, Petersen, & van der Sluijs, 2009 ). Addressing these challenges requires a nuanced understanding of the interplay between faith and environment in specific cultural contexts. Faith-based Affirmative Action for Environmental Conservation in Pakistan The relationship between religion, faith-based communities, and environmental conservation has been a subject of profound exploration for many sociologists and environmentalists over the years (Djupe & Hunt, 2009 ; Eckberg & Blocker, 1996 ; Guth et al., 1995 ; Hand & Van Liere, 1984 ). Within the Pakistani context, however, this intersection has been significantly under-researched, despite the country’s religiously devout population and pressing environmental concerns. Research has previously established that religious values and teachings can shape human attitudes towards the environment. For instance, religion can influence environmental concern and stewardship by fostering an ethical perspective towards the natural world (Woodrum & Hoban, 1994 ). Furthermore, religious groups and institutions have been reported to play instrumental roles in promoting environmental sustainability by encouraging community mobilization (Veldman et al., 2014; Wardekker et al., 2009 ). Regarding Islamic perspectives on environmental conservation, they often emphasize a doctrine of "stewardship" or "khalifa," a religious principle that holds human beings accountable for the preservation of the Earth (Khalid & O'Brien, 1992; Saniotis, 2012 ). As Pakistan is predominantly an Islamic country, these principles are widely prevalent and hold potential for environmental conservation activities. Still, there is a dearth of empirical evidence that interrogates how these faith-based principles can be employed within an affirmative action framework for environmental conservation in Pakistan. The socio-cultural fabric of Pakistan is deeply intertwined with religious sentiments and values, making it imperative to address this gap in the literature. Contrarily, some studies indicate that the interplay between faith-based communities and environmental conservation is not always straightforward. Scholars such as Taylor ( 2007 ) and White ( 1967 ) argue that religious dogmas can sometimes hinder environmental conservation efforts due to their anthropocentric orientations. Moreover, religious institutions might not always prioritize environmental concerns in their mission (Gottlieb, 2006 ). These potentially conflicting trajectories warrant a nuanced analysis of faith-based environmental conservation initiatives in Pakistan. On a positive note, studies carried out in other Muslim-majority countries have highlighted the potential of mosques, madrasas, and other religious institutions in fostering environmental consciousness and conservation actions (Foltz, 2000 ; ʻIzz al-Dīn, 2000 ; Saniotis, 2012 ). Considering the high density and influence of such institutions in Pakistan, a faith-based approach to environmental conservation could yield promising results. However, significant questions still need to be addressed: How effectively can faith-based principles be integrated into environmental conservation policies in Pakistan? Can religious leaders play a significant role in promoting environmental consciousness among their followers? How can religious institutions be mobilized to contribute towards tangible environmental conservation outcomes? And more importantly, how can such interventions be designed to be sensitive to the diverse religious beliefs and cultural norms prevalent in Pakistan? In summation, the dialogue around faith-based affirmative action for environmental conservation in Pakistan is still in its nascent stages. Given the centrality of religious belief systems in Pakistani society and the escalating environmental challenges, it becomes crucial to undertake further research in this domain. A comprehensive exploration of this intersection would not only enhance the sociological understanding of faith-based environmental interventions but could also inform policy recommendations towards achieving sustainable environmental conservation in Pakistan. Methods and Materials The action-based research project set out to address the pressing issue of solid waste management in Islamabad, particularly focusing on Bhara Kahu, one of the city’s peripheral areas that experiences significant waste dumping. As Islamabad produces nearly 1000 tons of waste per day (Siddiqui, Ahmed, & Rashid, 2021), it becomes pertinent to adopt an integrative and multidisciplinary approach to solve the solid waste management crisis. The project borrowed its guiding principles from the ‘waste management hierarchy’, also known as the 5Rs (Refuse, Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, and Recovery), while deploying an innovative four-phase research strategy. The phase one centered on a comprehensive Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) survey, intended to evaluate existing perceptions, practices, and knowledge gaps relating to solid waste generation and its management (Makarichi, Jutidamrongphan, & Techato, 2018 ). The methodology involved conducting a household survey along with in-depth interviews to quantify and categorize the types of household waste produced. Additionally, an effort was made to map the community's demographic and need-based profiles, an approach which is endorsed by sociologists for effective community-focused interventions (Moloney, Horne, & Fien, 2010 ). Phase Two leaned on the insights garnered from the first phase, allowing the project to tailor effective community interventions. This phase was partitioned into two stages: the first involved categorizing the solid waste with reference to the 5Rs hierarchy, while the second stage revolved around awareness campaigns and training workshops. The latter aimed at community mobilization and incorporated representatives from various spheres of community life, including administrative, educational, and religious institutions. The third and fourth phases worked on implementing an intervention scheme based on the learnings from the previous phases. Training for waste collectors, logistics arrangements related to waste collection, and fostering a symbiotic relationship between the local municipality and potential private waste management partners constituted the core elements of this phase. The last stage, in particular, was designed to assess the outcome of the research project and was subsequently followed by an evaluation study (Denzin & Lincoln, 2018 ). The action-based research project offered an avenue for the involved stakeholders to actively promote a circular economy in relation to the town's waste management. The objective was to create a comprehensive waste management plan that could be emulated in other similar urban peripheries (Holmberg & Robèrt, 2000 ). This novel research strategy places a strong emphasis on community engagement and provides valuable insights for future endeavors to tackle the solid waste management crisis in similar sociocultural and environmental contexts. Explanation of Data Collection Method This research utilized an integrated, multidisciplinary approach, employing various data collection methods throughout its various stages. This approach is crucial in assessing the effectiveness of faith-based affirmative action on solid waste management in Bhara Kahu, an urban periphery of Islamabad. Phase 1 implemented a mixed-methods approach, deploying both quantitative and qualitative research techniques. A Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices (KAP) survey was conducted to gauge the community's understanding and behaviors concerning solid waste generation and management. A representative sample of the project area was selected through systematic sampling for this survey, and the collected data was subsequently analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics software. Concurrently, in-depth interviews and focused group discussions were conducted, particularly with representatives from religious, political, and administrative institutions. These interviews provided a more nuanced understanding of solid waste management within the community, offering an opportunity to identify gaps in knowledge or practices, understand the local waste generation process, and assess primary and secondary collection methods. This phase also helped to develop a demographic and needs-based profile of the community (Bryman, 2012 ). Phase 2 used the findings from the KAP study to organize awareness campaigns, training programs, and workshops addressing solid waste management issues. The local waste was characterized using the 5Rs hierarchy model (Refuse, Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, Recovery), a strategy that considers the social aspects of waste management (McGregor, 2015). This characterization involved collecting data on the composition of the waste and subsequently dividing it into categories based on its potential for reduction, reuse, recycling, or recovery. The second stage of Phase 2 focused on implementing awareness and training campaigns. This phase was instrumental in social mobilization, involving local community members and representatives from different societal sectors. This allowed for direct observation and data collection regarding the engagement and commitment of various community actors to the project's objectives. Techniques such as door-to-door pamphlet distribution and use of social media campaigns provided a platform for wider reach and awareness, subsequently contributing to data collection about community participation (Marshall & Rossman, 2014). The third phase involved implementing a pilot project to address issues identified in the previous phases. This involved collecting data on the effectiveness of training for waste collectors, the logistics of waste collection, and the process of collaboration between the local municipality and private waste management companies. In the final stage of the project, an evaluation study was conducted to assess the outcomes of the project and gauge its success. This involved an analysis of the compiled data from all previous phases to assess whether the project objectives were met and to identify any areas that may need improvement. The data collection methods implemented in this research project were designed to provide a comprehensive understanding of the issue of solid waste management in Bhara Kahu, Islamabad. The combination of quantitative and qualitative techniques allowed for a more nuanced understanding of the complex interplay of social, cultural, and religious factors that affect attitudes and practices towards solid waste management. This integrative approach has been increasingly recommended in sociological research to ensure the collection of rich, contextually grounded data that captures the complexity of social phenomena (Johnson, Onwuegbuzie, & Turner, 1995 ). Details of Field Experience The field experience took place in the Bhara Kahu region on the outskirts of Islamabad, a diverse and rapidly urbanizing area of Pakistan. Bhara Kahu was an ideal location to assess the impact of faith-based affirmative action initiatives due to its distinct religious character, evident in the visible religious practices and institutions throughout the community (Khan & Anwar, 2022). Bhara Kahu presents a rich tapestry of socio-economic and cultural diversity, with the religious practices deeply embedded in everyday life. The researchers found that the residents of this area had a high reverence for religious teachings, and the community leaders were deeply engaged in interpreting and disseminating these teachings. The researchers spent extensive periods embedded in the community, engaging directly with community members, attending religious gatherings, and participating in environmental conservation activities. One of the primary faith-based initiatives undertaken was an educational program on environmental conservation, which was framed within the context of religious teachings on stewardship. This initiative was designed in collaboration with local religious leaders, who played a crucial role in communicating the religious imperative for environmental stewardship. In addition to the educational program, the researchers initiated a community clean-up event. This event incorporated elements of religious teachings on cleanliness and responsibility towards the community, drawing a direct connection between faith and environmental action. It was observed that framing the clean-up within the context of religious teachings fostered greater participation and enthusiasm among community members. Finally, the research team initiated a faith-inspired waste management project, which sought to reduce the environmental impact of household waste by promoting recycling and composting practices. By invoking religious teachings on the care for creation, the project engaged community members in practical actions to manage their waste in an environmentally responsible manner. Throughout these experiences, the researchers documented the responses, attitudes, and behaviours of the community towards these faith-based initiatives. The field experiences provided rich qualitative data that contributed to a nuanced understanding of the impact of faith-based affirmative action on environmental conservation in this specific cultural context. Results Faith and Household Solid Waste Management The findings from our research reveal a significant impact of faith-based affirmative action on attitudes and behaviours towards household solid waste management. The introduction of religious teachings in the context of environmental conservation resulted in a marked shift in attitudes. Participants who attended the educational programs exhibited a heightened sense of responsibility towards the environment, viewing waste management not merely as a civic duty, but as a religious obligation. For instance, the conversion of a street into 'model street' reflected the change in community attitudes. Participants enthusiastically painted walls with eco-friendly messages, cleaned their streets, and installed dustbins made of recycled items. The process of converting a regular street into model one became symbolic of the transformation in their environmental consciousness. Participants expressed a sense of pride and accomplishment in their actions, viewing their contributions as a form of religious service, thus demonstrating the powerful influence of faith in shaping behaviours. Furthermore, the research findings also pointed towards a significant level of community participation, driven by the faith-based affirmative action program. Women and children, traditionally overlooked in community initiatives, actively participated in household solid waste management trainings. The community's willingness to send their women and children to these training programs indicated the acceptance and endorsement of the faith-based initiative. Interestingly, participants cited religious teachings on stewardship and communal responsibility as the primary motivators for their participation. The belief that caring for the environment was a way of practicing their faith fostered a sense of collective purpose within the community. Moreover, the influence of faith leaders was critical in driving community participation. Their involvement in the project added credibility and motivated the community to engage actively. The willingness of community members to participate in the clean-up event, and their sustained efforts in the waste management project, demonstrated the potency of faith as a mobilizing force. These findings highlight the effectiveness of faith-based affirmative action in changing attitudes and behaviours towards household solid waste management. They underline the value of incorporating religious teachings into environmental conservation initiatives, particularly in contexts where faith plays a significant role in shaping social values and behaviours. Impact of Religious Faith on Environmental Conservation The field experience from the Bhara Kahu region indicated a discernible shift in attitudes towards environmental conservation, prompted by faith-based affirmative action. In the context of almost 100% Muslim population, the infusion of environmental stewardship principles within the broader teachings of Islam instigated a new perspective on the role of individuals in preserving their environment. As the religious teachings emphasized the importance of protecting God's creation, community members began to perceive their involvement in environmental conservation as an integral part of their faith practice. This perception was visible in their attitudes towards the care of public spaces, the use of resources, and the disposal of household waste. The understanding that environmental conservation was a form of religious obligation inspired a change in how community members treated their surroundings, leading to a more respectful and conscientious interaction with the environment. One of the most notable findings from our research was the active involvement of religious leaders in the community's environmental conservation efforts. The imams of local mosques and religious teachers played a pivotal role in advocating for environmental stewardship, spreading awareness about the importance of proper waste management and its alignment with Islamic teachings. Particularly, their willingness to use Jumma sermons - a platform with significant influence - to spread environmental awareness illustrated the profound impact of faith-based affirmative action. They pledged to regularly address issues of environmental conservation and waste management in their sermons, drawing parallels between these actions and religious values of cleanliness, respect for God's creations, and community responsibility. The active participation of religious leaders played a key role in legitimizing and reinforcing the importance of the environmental conservation initiatives. As respected members of the community, their involvement in the project added a level of credibility and encouraged the community to engage more enthusiastically. These findings underscore the effectiveness of faith-based affirmative action in engaging religious communities in environmental conservation efforts. By drawing upon the power of religious faith, the program was successful in shifting attitudes towards environmental conservation and promoting community participation in conservation initiatives. This suggests that faith-based approaches can be a powerful tool in fostering environmental stewardship, particularly in regions with strong religious underpinnings. Discussion The findings of this research hold significant implications for sustainable development and conservation practices, particularly in societies where faith plays a dominant role in shaping social values and behaviors. It is evident that in contexts such as Bhara Kahu, faith-based affirmative action has a profound impact on attitudes and behaviors towards environmental conservation. Traditionally, discussions surrounding sustainable development and conservation practices have been framed within a secular context, emphasizing the need for responsible management of resources, reduction of environmental harm, and promotion of sustainable lifestyles. However, these secular perspectives often fall short in mobilizing individuals and communities, particularly in societies where faith plays a central role. The results suggest that integrating faith into conservation strategies, rather than focusing solely on secular values, can catalyze transformative changes in attitudes and behaviors. By connecting environmental stewardship with religious teachings, individuals perceive their conservation efforts not only as a civic duty but also as a sacred obligation. This perception reorients environmental action from being an optional altruistic endeavor to a moral necessity. Furthermore, this research highlights the potential of religious communities as powerful agents of change. The active participation of religious leaders in conservation initiatives provides these initiatives with a level of legitimacy and endorsement, encouraging wider community engagement. Thus, the involvement of faith leaders is essential in effectively mobilizing religious communities for environmental conservation. The incorporation of faith into environmental action brings an ethical dimension to conservation efforts. It reframes environmental stewardship as a moral duty, a manifestation of respect for God's creation, and a form of spiritual practice. This ethical framing resonates deeply with individuals' values and beliefs, prompting a profound shift in attitudes towards environmental conservation. It adds a moral urgency to conservation efforts, invoking not just a sense of responsibility, but also of morality and conscience. In essence, the integration of faith-based affirmative action in environmental conservation initiatives signifies a shift from a largely utilitarian approach towards a more holistic, ethically grounded perspective. This approach acknowledges the interconnectedness of human spirituality, ethics, and the natural environment, and advocates for a more sustainable, equitable, and conscientious interaction with our planet. The findings demonstrate the significant impact of faith-based affirmative action on attitudes, behaviours, and community participation in household solid waste management and environmental conservation, align with and extend the existing body of literature in this domain. Our findings resonate with the work of Bergmann ( 2021 ), who explored the intersection of climate impact studies and religion, suggesting that religious teachings can influence human and cultural dimensions of environmental conservation. Similarly, our study found that the introduction of religious teachings in the context of environmental conservation resulted in a marked shift in attitudes, with participants viewing waste management not merely as a civic duty, but as a religious obligation. Bloomfield ( 2019 ) also highlighted the potential of religion to intervene in environmentalism, suggesting that religious teachings can influence responses to climate change. This is consistent with our findings, which showed that participants began to perceive their involvement in environmental conservation as an integral part of their faith practice. The significant level of community participation observed in our study, particularly among women and children, echoes the findings of Chitando, Conradie, and Kilonzo ( 2022 ), who suggested that religious beliefs can be used to respond and adapt to the challenges posed by climate change. This aligns with our observation that participants cited religious teachings on stewardship and communal responsibility as the primary motivators for their participation. The role of faith leaders in driving community participation, as observed in our study, is also supported by the work of Mrozowska and Hintz ( 2020 ), who found that church authorities can influence climate policy in the European Union. Similarly, we found that the involvement of faith leaders in our project added credibility and motivated the community to engage actively. Our findings extend the work of Shoko ( 2022 ), who argued that African Traditional Religion (ATR) can contribute towards mitigating the effects of climate change. We found that the infusion of environmental stewardship principles within the broader teachings of Islam instigated a new perspective on the role of individuals in preserving their environment. The active involvement of religious leaders in the community's environmental conservation efforts, as observed in our study, aligns with the findings of Murray and Xing ( 2020 ), who suggested that religion can influence climate responses. In our study, religious leaders used their influence to spread environmental awareness, further illustrating the profound impact of faith-based affirmative action. Conclusion In contemplating the terrain of environmental conservation, the exploration of faith-based affirmative action emerges as a substantial component. The current study focuses on these entwined strands of faith, community action, and environmental stewardship. The ebb and flow of our findings weave a compelling narrative: faith is not merely a passive bystander but a potent catalyst in the promotion of environmental conservation within the urban confluence of Bhara Kahu, Pakistan. Refracting the light of faith-based affirmative action through the prism of household solid waste management revealed compelling shifts in attitudes and behaviours. Our study, like an archaeologist unearthing hidden relics, discovered the profound transformation of mundane waste management routines into acts imbued with a sense of sacred duty and profound communal responsibility. This resulted in a vibrant tapestry of community engagement, where environmental stewardship became not just an act of civic duty, but a lived expression of faith. Moreover, the powerful current of community participation underscored the potential of faith as a mobilizing force. The surging involvement of women and children, often marginalized in such initiatives, sends ripples across traditional gender roles and power dynamics, challenging prevailing norms and forging new societal frontiers. This transformative potential of faith-based affirmative action in driving active participation constitutes a significant stride in galvanizing collective action towards environmental conservation. Broader implications of our research findings permeate beyond the local context, resonating with global discourses around environmental conservation. The research unveils the versatile nature of faith as an agent of environmental change, a potential that, though enacted within the specificity of Bhara Kahu, can be translated into different religious and cultural contexts. This emergent universality reconfigures the concept of faith-based affirmative action as a global strategy, sparking a reevaluation of environmental policies and practices. While faith-based initiatives are a potent tool, their role within the vast machinery of sustainable development is complex and multifaceted. Nonetheless, the study paints a promising panorama where faith-based affirmative action strategies could bridge the chasm between current practices and sustainable environmental conservation, driving a paradigm shift towards sustainable development. However, this research, akin to an uncharted territory with hidden landscapes, is not devoid of limitations. The specific socio-cultural milieu of Bhara Kahu, while rich in its distinct religious fabric, may not be seamlessly transferable to other regions or contexts. Additionally, the focus on household solid waste management, although critical, is but one facet of the kaleidoscope of environmental conservation. Future explorations could journey into the unexplored terrains of other aspects of environmental conservation. In conclusion, the research reverberates with the echoes of faith, revealing its power to shape attitudes and inspire action towards environmental conservation. In the symphony of sustainable development, faith-based affirmative action emerges not as a solitary note but as a resonating chord, harmonizing the melody of environmental stewardship. Despite the limitations, the study charts new territories in the nexus of faith and environmental conservation, providing a novel lens through which we can reimagine and redesign our collective efforts towards a sustainable future. Declarations The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Fatima Jinnah Women University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan (Approval ID: Ref No 20-LCF-152/RGM/R&D/HEC/2020). Approval was granted on 08 May 2021, prior to the commencement of any research activities. All research was performed in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The scope of approval covered the full study protocol, including participant recruitment, informed consent procedures, data collection, and confidentiality measures involving human participants. Consent to participate We obtained verbal consent from each participant to participate in this study. Funding details First and second authors received funding from the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan, that supports this research. Authors Contribution First and second authors: Conceptualisation; data collection; validation; writing the first draft. Third and Forth authors: Conceptualisation; data collection; validation; writing—review and editing. Data availability statement The data can be provided as per request. References Adams WM (2006), January The future of sustainability: Re-thinking environment and development in the twenty-first century. In Report of the IUCN renowned thinkers meeting (Vol. 29, No. 31) Austin BJ, Robinson CJ, Fitzsimons JA, Sandford M, Ens EJ, Macdonald JM, Garnett ST (2018) Integrated measures of Indigenous land and sea management effectiveness: challenges and opportunities for improved conservation partnerships in Australia. Conserv Soc 16(3):372–384 Baruth M, Wilcox S (2013) Multiple behavior change among church members taking part in the faith, activity, and nutrition program. J Nutr Educ Behav 45(5):428–434 Bauman WA (2014) Religion and ecology: Developing a planetary ethic. Columbia University Beder S (2000) Costing the earth: Equity, sustainable development and environmental economics. New Z J Environ Law 4:227–244 Bergmann S (2021) Weather religion and climate change. Routledge Bergoglio J (2015) Laudato Si: On care for our common home. Vatican Berkes F (2007) Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(39), 15188–15193 Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2008) Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change. Cambridge University Press Bhagwat SA, Dudley N, Harrop SR (2011) Religious following in biodiversity hotspots: challenges and opportunities for conservation and development. Conserv Lett 4(3):234–240 Bhagwat SA, Ormsby AA, Rutte C (2011) The Role of Religion in Linking Conservation and Development: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature & Culture, 5(1) Bloomfield EF (2019) Communication strategies for engaging climate skeptics: religion and the environment. Routledge Bowen WG, Bok D (2016) The shape of the river: Long-term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions. The Shape of the River. Princeton University Press Brand F (2005) Ecological resilience and its relevance within a theory of sustainable development (No. 03/2005). UFZ-Bericht Bryman A (2012) Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press Callicott JB (1989) In defense of the land ethic: Essays in environmental philosophy. Suny Chandler D (2004) Constructing global civil society: morality and power in international relations. Springer Chapple CK (ed) (2006) Jainism and ecology: nonviolence in the web of life, vol 22. Motilal Banarsidass Publishe Chitando E, Conradie EM, Kilonzo S (2022) African perspectives on religion and climate change. Routledge Cochrane LL (2013) Land Degradation, Faith-Based Organizations, and Sustainability in S Enegal. Culture, Agriculture. Food Environ 35(2):112–124 Colding J, Folke C (2001) Social taboos:invisible systems of local resource management and biological conservation. Ecol Appl 11(2):584–600 Cook J, Nuccitelli D, Green SA, Richardson M, Winkler B, Painting R, Skuce A (2016) Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming. Environ Res Lett 11(4):048002 Corlett RT (2017) A bigger toolbox: biotechnology in biodiversity conservation. Trends Biotechnol 35(1):55–65 Cui N, Wu T, Wang YC, Zou H, Axmacher JC, Sang W, Guo L (2022) Buddhist monasteries facilitated landscape conservation on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Landscape Ecol 37(6):1559–1572 Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (2018) Strategies of qualitative inquiry. Sage Djupe PA, Hunt PK (2009) Beyond the Lynn White thesis: Congregational effects on environmental concern. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48(4), 670–686 Dudley N, Higgins-Zogib L, Mansourian S (2009) The links between protected areas, faiths, and sacred natural sites. Conserv Biol 23(3):568–577 Eckberg DL, Blocker TJ (1989) Varieties of religious involvement and environmental concerns: Testing the Lynn White thesis. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 509–517 Eckberg DL, Blocker TJ (1996) Christianity, environmentalism, and the theoretical problem of fundamentalism. J Sci Study Relig, 343–355 Ekins P, Simon S, Deutsch L, Folke C, De Groot R (2003) A framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability. Ecol Econ 44(2–3):165–185 Field CB, Barros VR (eds) (2014) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS, Walker B (2002) Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. AMBIO: J Hum Environ 31(5):437–440 Foltz R (2000) Is there an Islamic environmentalism? Environ Ethics 22(1):63–72 Foltz R (2003) Islam and ecology: A bestowed trust. Center for the Study of World Religions, Harvard Divinity School Foltz RC (2003) Worldviews, religion, and the environment: A global anthology. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning Gardner G (2002) Invoking the spirit: Religion and spirituality in the quest for a sustainable world. Worldwatch Paper 164:1–49 Gardner GT (2006) Inspiring progress: religions' contributions to sustainable development. WW Norton & Company Garrard GE et al (2013) A general model of detectability using species traits. Methods Ecol Evol 4(1):45–52 Gerten D, Bergmann S (2012) Religion in environmental and climate change: Suffering, values, lifestyles. Bloomsbury Publishing Giddings B, Hopwood B, O'Brien G (2002) Environment, economy and society: fitting them together into sustainable development. Sustain Dev 10(4):187–196 Goebbert K, Jenkins-Smith HC, Klockow K, Nowlin MC, Silva CL (2012) Weather, climate, and worldviews: The sources and consequences of public perceptions of changes in local weather patterns. Weather Clim Soc 4(2):132–144 Gottlieb RS (ed) (2006) The Oxford handbook of religion and ecology. OUP USA Goudie AS (2018) Human impact on the natural environment. Wiley Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110(2):353–377 Guth JL, Green JC, Kellstedt LA, Smidt CE (1995) Faith and the environment: Religious beliefs and attitudes on environmental policy. Am J Polit Sci, 364–382 Hand CM, Van Liere KD (1984) Religion, mastery-over-nature, and environmental concern. Soc Forces 63(2):555–570 Harris EJ (2008) Buddhism and ecology. In: Gerten D, Bergmann S (eds) Religion in environmental and climate change: Suffering, values, lifestyles. Bloomsbury Publishing, pp 117–134 Hitzhusen GE, Tucker ME (2013) The potential of religion for Earth Stewardship. Front Ecol Environ 11(7):368–376 Holden E, Linnerud K, Banister D (2017) The imperatives of sustainable development. Sustain Dev 25(3):213–226 Holmberg J, Robèrt KH (2000) Backcasting-A framework for strategic planning. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol 7(4):291–308 Hoornweg D, Bhada-Tata P (2012) What a waste: A global review of solid waste management. Urban Development & Local Government Unit: The World Bank ʻIzz al-Dīn MY (2000) The environmental dimensions of Islam. James Clarke & Co Jenkins W (2009) After Lynn White: Religious ethics and environmental problems. J Relig Ethics 37(2):283–309 Jenkins W, Chapple CK (2011) Religion and environment. Annu Rev Environ Resour 36:441–463 Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ, Turner LA (2007) Toward a definition of mixed methods research. J mixed methods Res 1(2):112–133 Kearns L (1997) Noah's ark goes to Washington: A profile of evangelical environmentalism. Social Compass 44(3):349–366 Kellert SR, Wilson EO (1995) The biophilia hypothesis. Island Le Quéré C, Andrew RM, Friedlingstein P, Sitch S, Hauck J, Pongratz J, Zheng B (2018) Global carbon budget 2018. Earth Syst Sci Data 10(4):2141–2194 Leach M, Stirling AC, Scoones I (2010) Dynamic sustainabilities: technology, environment, social justice. Taylor & Francis, p 232 Lewis SL, Maslin MA (2015) Defining the anthropocene. Nature 519(7542):171–180 Makarichi L, Jutidamrongphan W, Techato KA (2018) The evolution of waste-to-energy incineration: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 91:812–821 Malhotra KC (2008) Sacred Groves in India: An Overview. Conserving the Sacred for Biodiversity Management. Indira Gandhi Rashtriya Manav Sangrahalaya, New Delhi, India Mebratu D (1998) Sustainability and sustainable development: historical and conceptual review. Environ Impact Assess Rev 18(6):493–520 Moloney S, Horne RE, Fien J (2010) Transitioning to low carbon communities—from behaviour change to systemic change: Lessons from Australia. Energy policy 38(12):7614–7623 Mrozowska S, Hintz M (2020) Religion and climate policy in the European Union. European Journal of Science and Theology V16 N5 (2020): 143–156 Murray G, Xing H (2020) Religion and Climate Change: Rain Rituals in Israel, China, and Haiti. Religions 11(11):554 Norenzayan A, Shariff AF (2008) The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. Science 322(5898):58–62 Palmer M, Finlay V (2003) Faith in conservation: new approaches to religions and the environment. World Bank Pearce D, Markandya A, Barbier EB (1989) Blueprint for a Green Economy. Earthscan Redclift M (2005) Sustainable development (1987–2005): an oxymoron comes of age. Sustain Dev 13(4):212–227 Rees WE (2018) Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. The Earthscan Reader in Rural-Urban Linkages. Routledge, pp 285–297 Robina Ramirez R, Pulido Fernandez M (2018) Religious travellers’ improved attitude towards nature. Sustainability 10(9):3064 Saniotis A (2012) Muslims and ecology: fostering Islamic environmental ethics. Contemp Islam 6(2):155–171 Sheridan MJ (2008) The environmental and social history of African sacred groves: A Tanzanian case study. Afr Stud Rev 51(3):69–98 Shoko T (2022) African Traditional Religion and climate change: Perspectives from Zimbabwe. African Perspectives on Religion and Climate Change. Routledge, pp 22–33 Sponsel LE (2012) Spiritual ecology: a quiet revolution. Bloomsbury Publishing USA Steffen W, Grinevald J, Crutzen P, McNeill J (2011) The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, physical and engineering sciences, 369(1938), 842–867 Stern DI (2004) The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev 32(8):1419–1439 Taylor B (2007) Exploring Religion, Nature and Culture–Introducing the Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature & Culture, 1(1) Taylor B (2016) Religion and environmentalism and America and beyond. In: Gottlieb RS (ed) The Oxford handbook of religion and ecology. Oxford University Press, pp 588–612 Taylor BR (2010) Dark green religion: Nature spirituality and the planetary future. University of California Press Taylor B, Van Wieren G (2016) Ecological resistance movements in religion and ethics: A reader. SUNY Tirosh-Samuelson H (2002) Judaism and ecology: created world and revealed word. Harvard University Press for the Center for the Study of World Religions, Harvard Divinity School Tomalin E (2002) The Limitations of Religious Environmentalism for India, Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology, 6(1), 12–30. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853502760184577 Tomalin E (2007) Religious studies and development: A literature review. International Development Department, University of Birmingham Tomalin E (2009) Biodivinity and biodiversity: The limits to religious environmentalism. Ashgate Publishing, Surrey Tukker A, Jansen B (2006) Environmental impacts of products: A detailed review of studies. J Ind Ecol 10(3):159–182 Turner RK (1995) Sustainable development and climate change. Studies in Environmental Science, vol 65. Elsevier, pp 55–66 UNEP (2021) Making peace with nature: A scientific blueprint to tackle the climate, biodiversity and pollution emergencies. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya van der Ploeg J, Cauilan-Cureg M, van Weerd M, De Groot WT (2011) Assessing the effectiveness of environmental education: mobilizing public support for Philippine crocodile conservation. Conserv Lett 4(4):313–323 Van Huijstee MM, Francken M, Leroy P (2007) Partnerships for sustainable development: A review of current literature. Environ Sci 4(2):75–89 Veldman RG, Szasz A, Haluza-DeLay R (2013) How the world's religions are responding to climate change. Taylor & Francis, London Verschuuren B, Wild R, McNeeley J, Oviedo G (2010) Sacred natural sites: Conserving nature and culture. Earthscan Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM (1997) Human domination of Earth's ecosystems. Science 277(5325):494–499 Vucetich JA, Nelson MP (2010) Sustainability: virtuous or vulgar? Bioscience 60(7):539–544 Wardekker JA, Petersen AC, van Der Sluijs JP (2009) Ethics and public perception of climate change: Exploring the Christian voices in the US public debate. Glob Environ Change 19(4):512–521 White L (1967) The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. Science 155(3767):1203–1207 Woodrum E, Hoban T (1994) Theology and religiosity effects on environmentalism. Rev Religious Res, 193–206 Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-7944181","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":534712946,"identity":"5e1e5f01-6303-4d4b-8345-0e5fa130622f","order_by":0,"name":"Abida Sharif","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Fatima Jinnah Women University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Abida","middleName":"","lastName":"Sharif","suffix":""},{"id":534712947,"identity":"b7772d8e-05c2-44e3-b5e2-8c374def3523","order_by":1,"name":"Imran Sabir","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Quaid-i-Azam University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Imran","middleName":"","lastName":"Sabir","suffix":""},{"id":534712948,"identity":"f4e2d65b-c3d2-4945-95d8-953366967525","order_by":2,"name":"Inayat Ali","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1659-8492","institution":"Fatima Jinnah Women University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Inayat","middleName":"","lastName":"Ali","suffix":""},{"id":534712949,"identity":"60459651-fd2d-48fe-bac2-4d3d2868332f","order_by":3,"name":"Aneeqa Ansari","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Fatima Jinnah Women University/ Quaid-i-Azam University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Aneeqa","middleName":"","lastName":"Ansari","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-10-27 05:27:15","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":true,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":true,"humanSubjectConsent":true,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7944181/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7944181/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":95281462,"identity":"a025bc5c-da26-4dcf-99a5-b27334fa9540","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-06 09:18:25","extension":"docx","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":57188,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"ArticleFaithBased26925.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7944181/v1/0a89dc414f7d9bb539f4a59c.docx"},{"id":95281461,"identity":"f7cd40ab-8a63-457a-8fce-e9364406ba10","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-06 09:18:25","extension":"json","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":342,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"rs7944181.json","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7944181/v1/e6154406e172f3e87bd6d2f0.json"},{"id":95281463,"identity":"25e2879c-4b13-4ca3-8bbb-7bffe71e9738","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-06 09:18:25","extension":"xml","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":144366,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"rs79441810enriched.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7944181/v1/53dc8c4a8a89c2f892d4e9bf.xml"},{"id":95281466,"identity":"c33bbe3d-c704-4284-84e1-bfcc1f3bf5e9","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-06 09:18:25","extension":"xml","order_by":3,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":142500,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"rs79441810structuring.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7944181/v1/7df27b5242fa435c0fe0eed9.xml"},{"id":95281464,"identity":"1bdadd80-330e-4b61-a221-61388f7db5ed","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-06 09:18:25","extension":"html","order_by":4,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":148569,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"earlyproof.html","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7944181/v1/9dd6c96c2c7a8a4713aeb29a.html"},{"id":95314053,"identity":"4717a49c-93a6-4372-bb46-c0262e1b31f6","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-06 15:52:26","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":643679,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7944181/v1/cf2a2f0a-c222-4bbe-ad71-f4cdfbf56806.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFaith-based Affirmative Action for Environmental Conservation: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe significance of environmental conservation has never been more pertinent. As we find ourselves in the Anthropocene, a geological epoch defined by the significant global impact humans have on the Earth's ecosystems, there is a pressing need to reassess our relationship with the natural world (Lewis \u0026amp; Maslin, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR60\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e; Steffen et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR77\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e). Unfortunately, the rapid industrialization and unchecked development projects across the globe have increasingly put pressure on our natural environment, accelerating climate change, loss of biodiversity, and pollution (Corlett, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; IPBES, 2019; IPCC, 2014). Given the scale of the challenges we face, traditional top-down approaches to environmental management and conservation have proven inadequate (Leach et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR59\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e; UNEP, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR89\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). In response, there has been a surge of interest in grassroots movements and community-based conservation initiatives, leading researchers to explore new pathways towards sustainable development (Berkes, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e). Among such pathways, the role of faith and belief in environmental conservation has emerged as a subject of particular interest. Religion, with its profound influence on human behavior and values, is increasingly being recognized as a critical factor in shaping people's attitudes towards the environment (Garrard et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFaith-based affirmative action for environmental conservation represents a novel approach to environmental stewardship, uniquely merging the tenets of religious faith with the principles of environmental conservation. Underpinning this approach is the recognition of the profound influence religious beliefs exert on the attitudes and behaviours of individuals and communities (Bauman, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e). Traditionally, affirmative action policies have been employed to rectify social injustices and economic disparities by providing preferential treatment to marginalized or disadvantaged groups in areas such as education and employment (Bowen \u0026amp; Bok, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e). In the realm of environmental conservation, however, affirmative action programs take on a slightly different character. Rather than addressing economic or social imbalances, these initiatives aim to foster environmental stewardship and sustainable practices among faith communities (Veldman et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR92\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eA considerable body of literature suggests that faith-based approaches can be more effective than non-faith approaches in promoting environmental conservation in developing countries (Austin et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e; Baruth \u0026amp; Wilcox, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e; Bauman, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e; Bhagwat, Ormsby, \u0026amp; Rutte, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e; Cochrane, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e; van der Ploeg et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR90\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e). This approach is underscored by the premise that religious faith, deeply ingrained in many societies, can inspire and motivate individuals and communities to take affirmative action towards environmental conservation (Taylor, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR82\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e; Tomalin, 2019). These faith-based initiatives are proactive in their orientation and strive to enact measurable change. They aim to effect positive environmental behaviour and promote sustainable practices by engaging religious groups in educational and outreach activities tailored to their beliefs and values (Hitzhusen \u0026amp; Tucker, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e). The assumption is that religious faith, deeply ingrained in many societies, can provide the moral imperative to inspire and motivate individuals and communities to take action for environmental conservation (Jenkins \u0026amp; Chapple, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR54\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eWhile there has been an increased interest in examining the interplay between faith and environmental conservation globally, a conspicuous gap remains in the literature concerning the impact and effectiveness of faith-based affirmative action programs in specific cultural and socio-economic contexts (Bauman, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e). The potential of faith-based affirmative action for environmental conservation has been under-explored in developing countries where faith plays a crucial role in shaping societal values and behaviours (Veldman et al., 2014), particularly in the area of solid waste management (Hoornweg \u0026amp; Bhada-Tata, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e). Despite having one of the largest Muslim populations in the world living in severe environmental conditions, the role of faith in environmental conservation in Pakistan has been under-studied. Given the overarching impact of religion on societal values and behaviours (Norenzayan \u0026amp; Shariff, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR67\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e), faith-based affirmative action is considered a promising avenue to promote environmental conservation and sustainable development (Veldman et al., 2014). Given the urgency of the environmental crisis and the potential of faith-based approaches to inspire action, it is critical to investigate this relationship further.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe research paper pays attention to the effectiveness of faith-based affirmative action in promoting environmental conservation in Pakistan, a country marked by its deep-seated religiosity and daunting environmental challenges. This study emerges from a recognition of the dearth of research focusing on the interplay of faith and environmentalism within the context of developing nations, particularly in relation to waste management. It particularly explores the influence of faith and belief on people's attitudes and behaviours towards household solid waste management in Pakistan. It further deals with the impact of faith-based affirmative action on community participation in household solid waste management. And what is the relationship between faith-based affirmative action and attitudes towards environmental conservation among religious people.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Literature Review","content":"\u003cp\u003eSeveral studies been dedicated to examining the intricate relationship between environmental conservation and sustainable development (Adams, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2006\u003c/span\u003e; Beder, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2000\u003c/span\u003e; Giddings, Hopwood, \u0026amp; O'Brien, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e). In the discourse of sustainable development, environmental conservation is not merely seen as an addendum but a pivotal cornerstone (Redclift, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR70\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2005\u003c/span\u003e). Turner (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR88\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1995\u003c/span\u003e) postulates that a sustainable future cannot be envisioned without robust environmental conservation policies, thereby underscoring the interconnectedness of the two concepts.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eHuman activities, principally driven by economic objectives, often lead to extensive environmental degradation (Grossman \u0026amp; Krueger, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1995\u003c/span\u003e; Stern, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR78\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e). Industrial pollution, deforestation, and overconsumption of resources have accelerated the rate of environmental degradation, threatening the planet's ecological balance (Goudie, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e; Rees, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR71\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e; Vitousek, Mooney, Lubchenco, \u0026amp; Melillo, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR94\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1997\u003c/span\u003e). In particular, Le Qu\u0026eacute;r\u0026eacute; et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR58\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e) and Tukker and Jansen (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR87\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2006\u003c/span\u003e) shed light on the distressing impact of human-induced carbon emissions on climate change and biodiversity loss.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eOn the flip side, sustainable development and environmental conservation hold the promise to counteract these deleterious impacts. They offer an integrative framework that merges economic growth with environmental stewardship, effectively arguing for a shift from resource-intensive to sustainable practices (Holden, Linnerud, \u0026amp; Banister, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; Mebratu, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR63\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1998\u003c/span\u003e). Embracing such a framework, according to Pearce, Markandya, and Barbier (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR69\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1989\u003c/span\u003e), offers the potential to retard, and potentially reverse, the rate of environmental degradation.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eEkins and colleagues (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e) posit that the principle of 'strong sustainability,' which emphasizes maintaining the total stock of capital, including natural capital, is a vital strategy to ensure long-term environmental health. Moreover, Folke and colleagues (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e) and Berkes, Colding, and Folke (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e) argue that an ecosystem-based approach to sustainable development is key to enhancing resilience and adaptive capacity in the face of environmental stressors. However, there is a perceived dichotomy between environmental conservation goals and sustainable development, a tension that demands further investigation (Vucetich \u0026amp; Nelson, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR95\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e). The debate is not merely academic; it has serious implications for policy-making and the trajectory of our collective future (Brand, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2005\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe current body of literature propounds the idea that while we cannot reverse all the harm done, a strong commitment to sustainable development and environmental conservation could chart a course towards a more resilient and sustainable future. Thus, understanding the symbiotic relationship between these two constructs is paramount for policymakers, environmentalists, and society at large. Therein lies the purpose of the present study: to offer a nuanced understanding of these entwined facets of our societal and environmental existence.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eFaith-based Approaches to Environmental Conservation\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn the quest for environmental sustainability, faith-based perspectives and actions have frequently emerged as notable actors (Gardner, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2006\u003c/span\u003e; Taylor, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR81\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e). Scholars such as Kearns (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1997\u003c/span\u003e) argue that religious communities are crucial for mobilizing action towards environmental conservation. Conversely, this potential is sometimes unheeded, with faith-based environmental initiatives receiving scant attention in mainstream environmental discourses (Wardekker et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR96\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eResearch has shown that the infusion of faith-based teachings can catalyze environmental awareness and conservation efforts. In particular, the concept of \"stewardship,\" prominent in many religious traditions, emphasizes the responsibility of humans to protect and conserve the Earth (Van Huijstee et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR91\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e). For instance, Christian principles of stewardship were demonstrated to significantly motivate individual environmental behaviors (Hand \u0026amp; Van Liere, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1984\u003c/span\u003e), while Islamic teachings of \"khalifah\" (stewardship) have been instrumental in promoting environmental awareness and conservation within Muslim communities (Khalid \u0026amp; O\u0026rsquo;Brien, 1992).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eBeyond individual motivations, faith communities can serve as pivotal societal actors for environmental sustainability. The Catholic Church's Encyclical \"Laudato Si\" provides a salient example, with Pope Francis urging for an \"ecological conversion\" to address the environmental crisis (Bergoglio, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). This call to action not only stirred Catholics but also fostered dialogue on environmental conservation in broader societal and interfaith contexts (Cook et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e; Jenkins, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e). However, faith-based conservation approaches are not without their challenges. Some scholars argue that religious beliefs can also contribute to environmental degradation (White, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR97\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1967\u003c/span\u003e), an assertion that has incited heated debates (Eckberg \u0026amp; Blocker, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1989\u003c/span\u003e). To this end, Callicott (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1989\u003c/span\u003e) points out that the instrumentalization of religious principles for environmental ends may lead to \"faith-washing,\" where faith is merely utilized as a tool to support pre-existing environmental agendas.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe complex relationship between faith and environmental conservation is further nuanced when considering sociopolitical factors. Veldman and colleagues (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR92\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e) found that political conservatism among religious groups in the United States, for example, can correlate with climate change skepticism, highlighting the intersectionality of religious, political, and environmental beliefs. The influence of faith-based initiatives on environmental conservation is a vibrant field of study, one that begs further exploration and greater recognition within the larger narrative of environmental conservation.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eSuccesses and Challenges of Faith-based Affirmative Action Programs for Environmental Conservation\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn the contemporary discourse on environmental conservation, scholars and practitioners alike have turned their attention towards the potential of faith-based affirmative action programs. Robina \u0026amp; Fernandez (2018) found that religious institutions can exercise considerable influence over their adherents' attitudes towards the environment, thereby promoting sustainable practices. Meanwhile, Harris (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e) observed that faith communities often embody values of stewardship, which can translate into active conservation efforts.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eNotably, these programs have reported numerous successes. For instance, faith-based organizations have been instrumental in local conservation and reforestation initiatives (Palmer \u0026amp; Finlay, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR68\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e; Kellert \u0026amp; Wilson, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR57\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1995\u003c/span\u003e). Further, Tirosh-Samuelson (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR83\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e) demonstrated that interfaith collaborations can significantly amplify the reach and impact of environmental initiatives, promoting cross-cultural understanding and collective action. Indeed, faith-based action has shown potential to foster community-led conservation efforts (Chandler, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e; Chapple, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2006\u003c/span\u003e). However, the effectiveness of faith-based affirmative action programs in environmental conservation is not without debate. Several researchers have raised concerns over the inconsistency of these programs. Some studies, such as those conducted by Kearns (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1997\u003c/span\u003e), indicate that although religious teachings may promote environmental stewardship, this does not always translate into meaningful action on the ground. In contrast, others, like Taylor and Van Wieren (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR82\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e), posit that religious worldviews can sometimes contribute to anthropocentric perspectives and exacerbate environmental degradation.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFurthermore, the intersection of faith-based affirmative action and environmental conservation presents unique challenges. As observed by Foltz (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e), some faith-based organizations may face resistance from their constituents for engaging in activities outside their traditional remit, such as environmental conservation. Gerten and Bergmann (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e) added that navigating the intricate relationships between religious doctrines, institutional practices, and environmental beliefs can often be a challenging endeavor.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eDespite these challenges, faith-based affirmative action programs hold promise in the environmental conservation landscape. However, there is a pressing need for more nuanced research on this subject. What does the available literature suggest about the mechanisms through which these programs can optimize their impact on environmental conservation? How can these programs navigate the challenges inherent in melding religious and environmental agendas? Answers to these questions could greatly enhance our understanding of the role faith-based affirmative action programs can play in environmental conservation. In sum, the study of faith-based affirmative action in environmental conservation is ripe with complexities. It presents a mosaic of promising triumphs interspersed with significant challenges. The task for scholars and practitioners is to carefully untangle these threads, thereby unearthing pathways towards more effective faith-based environmental stewardship.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eRole of Faith in Environmental Conservation in the Developing World\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOver the past few decades, a significant body of literature has explored the intricate connection between faith-based communities and environmental conservation, particularly in the developing world. This analysis begins with understanding the potency of faith in shaping human behaviors and attitudes, not excluding environmental stewardship (Sponsel, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR76\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e; Dudley, Higgins-Zogib, \u0026amp; Mansourian, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e). A key underpinning lies in the assertion that faith-based communities harbor significant potential for steering environmental conservation due to their extensive influence and reach, especially in developing countries (Bhagwat, Dudley, \u0026amp; Harrop, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e; Palmer \u0026amp; Finlay, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR68\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn a prominent study, Bhagwat, Dudley, \u0026amp; Harrop (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e) posited that in many developing societies, faith and spirituality remain the main social fabric connecting people, where religious teachings often play an instrumental role in shaping their actions towards the environment. This sentiment was echoed by Colding and Folke (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2001\u003c/span\u003e), who identified that sacred groves, linked with religious customs, have played a vital role in conserving biodiversity in various parts of the developing world. Similarly, Verschuuren et al., (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR93\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e) cited numerous examples of sacred sites serving as unofficial nature reserves, thereby nurturing environmental sustainability.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eConversely, some scholars critique faith-based environmental conservation as overly simplistic, arguing that it does not fully account for the intricate socio-cultural, political, and economic factors in these regions (Tomalin, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR84\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e). Still, there is an emerging consensus that faith-based environmental conservation can be integrated with scientific and policy-based approaches to make a more holistic and effective conservation strategy. Such integration, however, requires a thorough understanding of how faith-based practices can harmonize with secular environmental principles (Gardner, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e; Palmer \u0026amp; Finlay, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR68\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eCase studies illustrate this point. In a study focused on African traditional religions, Sheridan (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR74\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e) showed how belief systems led to the successful conservation of forests in Tanzania. Similarly, studies from the Mekong region demonstrated how Buddhist monastic communities have taken active roles in forest preservation, relying on religious teachings to foster environmental consciousness (Cui et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e; Sponsel, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR76\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e). A Hindu faith-based initiative in India showed a similar trajectory, where sacred groves contributed to local biodiversity conservation (Malhotra, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR62\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e). Despite these successful narratives, faith-based environmental conservation is not without challenges. Tomalin (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR85\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e; \u003cspan citationid=\"CR86\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e) highlighted the issue of contradictions within religious doctrines that may sometimes promote exploitation of nature. Moreover, religious institutions might face difficulties in navigating the terrain between spiritual and environmental mandates (Wardekker, Petersen, \u0026amp; van der Sluijs, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR96\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e). Addressing these challenges requires a nuanced understanding of the interplay between faith and environment in specific cultural contexts.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eFaith-based Affirmative Action for Environmental Conservation in Pakistan\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe relationship between religion, faith-based communities, and environmental conservation has been a subject of profound exploration for many sociologists and environmentalists over the years (Djupe \u0026amp; Hunt, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e; Eckberg \u0026amp; Blocker, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1996\u003c/span\u003e; Guth et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1995\u003c/span\u003e; Hand \u0026amp; Van Liere, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1984\u003c/span\u003e). Within the Pakistani context, however, this intersection has been significantly under-researched, despite the country\u0026rsquo;s religiously devout population and pressing environmental concerns.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eResearch has previously established that religious values and teachings can shape human attitudes towards the environment. For instance, religion can influence environmental concern and stewardship by fostering an ethical perspective towards the natural world (Woodrum \u0026amp; Hoban, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR98\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1994\u003c/span\u003e). Furthermore, religious groups and institutions have been reported to play instrumental roles in promoting environmental sustainability by encouraging community mobilization (Veldman et al., 2014; Wardekker et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR96\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eRegarding Islamic perspectives on environmental conservation, they often emphasize a doctrine of \"stewardship\" or \"khalifa,\" a religious principle that holds human beings accountable for the preservation of the Earth (Khalid \u0026amp; O'Brien, 1992; Saniotis, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR73\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e). As Pakistan is predominantly an Islamic country, these principles are widely prevalent and hold potential for environmental conservation activities. Still, there is a dearth of empirical evidence that interrogates how these faith-based principles can be employed within an affirmative action framework for environmental conservation in Pakistan. The socio-cultural fabric of Pakistan is deeply intertwined with religious sentiments and values, making it imperative to address this gap in the literature.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eContrarily, some studies indicate that the interplay between faith-based communities and environmental conservation is not always straightforward. Scholars such as Taylor (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR79\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e) and White (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR97\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1967\u003c/span\u003e) argue that religious dogmas can sometimes hinder environmental conservation efforts due to their anthropocentric orientations. Moreover, religious institutions might not always prioritize environmental concerns in their mission (Gottlieb, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2006\u003c/span\u003e). These potentially conflicting trajectories warrant a nuanced analysis of faith-based environmental conservation initiatives in Pakistan. On a positive note, studies carried out in other Muslim-majority countries have highlighted the potential of mosques, madrasas, and other religious institutions in fostering environmental consciousness and conservation actions (Foltz, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2000\u003c/span\u003e; ʻIzz al-Dīn, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2000\u003c/span\u003e; Saniotis, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR73\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e). Considering the high density and influence of such institutions in Pakistan, a faith-based approach to environmental conservation could yield promising results.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eHowever, significant questions still need to be addressed: How effectively can faith-based principles be integrated into environmental conservation policies in Pakistan? Can religious leaders play a significant role in promoting environmental consciousness among their followers? How can religious institutions be mobilized to contribute towards tangible environmental conservation outcomes? And more importantly, how can such interventions be designed to be sensitive to the diverse religious beliefs and cultural norms prevalent in Pakistan?\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn summation, the dialogue around faith-based affirmative action for environmental conservation in Pakistan is still in its nascent stages. Given the centrality of religious belief systems in Pakistani society and the escalating environmental challenges, it becomes crucial to undertake further research in this domain. A comprehensive exploration of this intersection would not only enhance the sociological understanding of faith-based environmental interventions but could also inform policy recommendations towards achieving sustainable environmental conservation in Pakistan.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Methods and Materials","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe action-based research project set out to address the pressing issue of solid waste management in Islamabad, particularly focusing on Bhara Kahu, one of the city\u0026rsquo;s peripheral areas that experiences significant waste dumping. As Islamabad produces nearly 1000 tons of waste per day (Siddiqui, Ahmed, \u0026amp; Rashid, 2021), it becomes pertinent to adopt an integrative and multidisciplinary approach to solve the solid waste management crisis. The project borrowed its guiding principles from the \u0026lsquo;waste management hierarchy\u0026rsquo;, also known as the 5Rs (Refuse, Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, and Recovery), while deploying an innovative four-phase research strategy.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe phase one centered on a comprehensive Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) survey, intended to evaluate existing perceptions, practices, and knowledge gaps relating to solid waste generation and its management (Makarichi, Jutidamrongphan, \u0026amp; Techato, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR61\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e). The methodology involved conducting a household survey along with in-depth interviews to quantify and categorize the types of household waste produced. Additionally, an effort was made to map the community's demographic and need-based profiles, an approach which is endorsed by sociologists for effective community-focused interventions (Moloney, Horne, \u0026amp; Fien, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR64\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePhase Two leaned on the insights garnered from the first phase, allowing the project to tailor effective community interventions. This phase was partitioned into two stages: the first involved categorizing the solid waste with reference to the 5Rs hierarchy, while the second stage revolved around awareness campaigns and training workshops. The latter aimed at community mobilization and incorporated representatives from various spheres of community life, including administrative, educational, and religious institutions.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe third and fourth phases worked on implementing an intervention scheme based on the learnings from the previous phases. Training for waste collectors, logistics arrangements related to waste collection, and fostering a symbiotic relationship between the local municipality and potential private waste management partners constituted the core elements of this phase. The last stage, in particular, was designed to assess the outcome of the research project and was subsequently followed by an evaluation study (Denzin \u0026amp; Lincoln, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe action-based research project offered an avenue for the involved stakeholders to actively promote a circular economy in relation to the town's waste management. The objective was to create a comprehensive waste management plan that could be emulated in other similar urban peripheries (Holmberg \u0026amp; Rob\u0026egrave;rt, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2000\u003c/span\u003e). This novel research strategy places a strong emphasis on community engagement and provides valuable insights for future endeavors to tackle the solid waste management crisis in similar sociocultural and environmental contexts.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eExplanation of Data Collection Method\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis research utilized an integrated, multidisciplinary approach, employing various data collection methods throughout its various stages. This approach is crucial in assessing the effectiveness of faith-based affirmative action on solid waste management in Bhara Kahu, an urban periphery of Islamabad. Phase 1 implemented a mixed-methods approach, deploying both quantitative and qualitative research techniques. A Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices (KAP) survey was conducted to gauge the community's understanding and behaviors concerning solid waste generation and management. A representative sample of the project area was selected through systematic sampling for this survey, and the collected data was subsequently analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics software.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eConcurrently, in-depth interviews and focused group discussions were conducted, particularly with representatives from religious, political, and administrative institutions. These interviews provided a more nuanced understanding of solid waste management within the community, offering an opportunity to identify gaps in knowledge or practices, understand the local waste generation process, and assess primary and secondary collection methods. This phase also helped to develop a demographic and needs-based profile of the community (Bryman, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePhase 2 used the findings from the KAP study to organize awareness campaigns, training programs, and workshops addressing solid waste management issues. The local waste was characterized using the 5Rs hierarchy model (Refuse, Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, Recovery), a strategy that considers the social aspects of waste management (McGregor, 2015). This characterization involved collecting data on the composition of the waste and subsequently dividing it into categories based on its potential for reduction, reuse, recycling, or recovery.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe second stage of Phase 2 focused on implementing awareness and training campaigns. This phase was instrumental in social mobilization, involving local community members and representatives from different societal sectors. This allowed for direct observation and data collection regarding the engagement and commitment of various community actors to the project's objectives. Techniques such as door-to-door pamphlet distribution and use of social media campaigns provided a platform for wider reach and awareness, subsequently contributing to data collection about community participation (Marshall \u0026amp; Rossman, 2014).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe third phase involved implementing a pilot project to address issues identified in the previous phases. This involved collecting data on the effectiveness of training for waste collectors, the logistics of waste collection, and the process of collaboration between the local municipality and private waste management companies.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn the final stage of the project, an evaluation study was conducted to assess the outcomes of the project and gauge its success. This involved an analysis of the compiled data from all previous phases to assess whether the project objectives were met and to identify any areas that may need improvement.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe data collection methods implemented in this research project were designed to provide a comprehensive understanding of the issue of solid waste management in Bhara Kahu, Islamabad. The combination of quantitative and qualitative techniques allowed for a more nuanced understanding of the complex interplay of social, cultural, and religious factors that affect attitudes and practices towards solid waste management. This integrative approach has been increasingly recommended in sociological research to ensure the collection of rich, contextually grounded data that captures the complexity of social phenomena (Johnson, Onwuegbuzie, \u0026amp; Turner, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR88\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1995\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eDetails of Field Experience\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe field experience took place in the Bhara Kahu region on the outskirts of Islamabad, a diverse and rapidly urbanizing area of Pakistan. Bhara Kahu was an ideal location to assess the impact of faith-based affirmative action initiatives due to its distinct religious character, evident in the visible religious practices and institutions throughout the community (Khan \u0026amp; Anwar, 2022).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eBhara Kahu presents a rich tapestry of socio-economic and cultural diversity, with the religious practices deeply embedded in everyday life. The researchers found that the residents of this area had a high reverence for religious teachings, and the community leaders were deeply engaged in interpreting and disseminating these teachings.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe researchers spent extensive periods embedded in the community, engaging directly with community members, attending religious gatherings, and participating in environmental conservation activities. One of the primary faith-based initiatives undertaken was an educational program on environmental conservation, which was framed within the context of religious teachings on stewardship. This initiative was designed in collaboration with local religious leaders, who played a crucial role in communicating the religious imperative for environmental stewardship.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn addition to the educational program, the researchers initiated a community clean-up event. This event incorporated elements of religious teachings on cleanliness and responsibility towards the community, drawing a direct connection between faith and environmental action. It was observed that framing the clean-up within the context of religious teachings fostered greater participation and enthusiasm among community members.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFinally, the research team initiated a faith-inspired waste management project, which sought to reduce the environmental impact of household waste by promoting recycling and composting practices. By invoking religious teachings on the care for creation, the project engaged community members in practical actions to manage their waste in an environmentally responsible manner.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThroughout these experiences, the researchers documented the responses, attitudes, and behaviours of the community towards these faith-based initiatives. The field experiences provided rich qualitative data that contributed to a nuanced understanding of the impact of faith-based affirmative action on environmental conservation in this specific cultural context.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eFaith and Household Solid Waste Management\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe findings from our research reveal a significant impact of faith-based affirmative action on attitudes and behaviours towards household solid waste management. The introduction of religious teachings in the context of environmental conservation resulted in a marked shift in attitudes. Participants who attended the educational programs exhibited a heightened sense of responsibility towards the environment, viewing waste management not merely as a civic duty, but as a religious obligation. For instance, the conversion of a street into 'model street' reflected the change in community attitudes. Participants enthusiastically painted walls with eco-friendly messages, cleaned their streets, and installed dustbins made of recycled items. The process of converting a regular street into model one became symbolic of the transformation in their environmental consciousness. Participants expressed a sense of pride and accomplishment in their actions, viewing their contributions as a form of religious service, thus demonstrating the powerful influence of faith in shaping behaviours.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFurthermore, the research findings also pointed towards a significant level of community participation, driven by the faith-based affirmative action program. Women and children, traditionally overlooked in community initiatives, actively participated in household solid waste management trainings. The community's willingness to send their women and children to these training programs indicated the acceptance and endorsement of the faith-based initiative.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eInterestingly, participants cited religious teachings on stewardship and communal responsibility as the primary motivators for their participation. The belief that caring for the environment was a way of practicing their faith fostered a sense of collective purpose within the community.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eMoreover, the influence of faith leaders was critical in driving community participation. Their involvement in the project added credibility and motivated the community to engage actively. The willingness of community members to participate in the clean-up event, and their sustained efforts in the waste management project, demonstrated the potency of faith as a mobilizing force.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThese findings highlight the effectiveness of faith-based affirmative action in changing attitudes and behaviours towards household solid waste management. They underline the value of incorporating religious teachings into environmental conservation initiatives, particularly in contexts where faith plays a significant role in shaping social values and behaviours.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eImpact of Religious Faith on Environmental Conservation\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe field experience from the Bhara Kahu region indicated a discernible shift in attitudes towards environmental conservation, prompted by faith-based affirmative action. In the context of almost 100% Muslim population, the infusion of environmental stewardship principles within the broader teachings of Islam instigated a new perspective on the role of individuals in preserving their environment.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAs the religious teachings emphasized the importance of protecting God's creation, community members began to perceive their involvement in environmental conservation as an integral part of their faith practice. This perception was visible in their attitudes towards the care of public spaces, the use of resources, and the disposal of household waste. The understanding that environmental conservation was a form of religious obligation inspired a change in how community members treated their surroundings, leading to a more respectful and conscientious interaction with the environment.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eOne of the most notable findings from our research was the active involvement of religious leaders in the community's environmental conservation efforts. The imams of local mosques and religious teachers played a pivotal role in advocating for environmental stewardship, spreading awareness about the importance of proper waste management and its alignment with Islamic teachings. Particularly, their willingness to use Jumma sermons - a platform with significant influence - to spread environmental awareness illustrated the profound impact of faith-based affirmative action. They pledged to regularly address issues of environmental conservation and waste management in their sermons, drawing parallels between these actions and religious values of cleanliness, respect for God's creations, and community responsibility.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe active participation of religious leaders played a key role in legitimizing and reinforcing the importance of the environmental conservation initiatives. As respected members of the community, their involvement in the project added a level of credibility and encouraged the community to engage more enthusiastically. These findings underscore the effectiveness of faith-based affirmative action in engaging religious communities in environmental conservation efforts. By drawing upon the power of religious faith, the program was successful in shifting attitudes towards environmental conservation and promoting community participation in conservation initiatives. This suggests that faith-based approaches can be a powerful tool in fostering environmental stewardship, particularly in regions with strong religious underpinnings.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe findings of this research hold significant implications for sustainable development and conservation practices, particularly in societies where faith plays a dominant role in shaping social values and behaviors. It is evident that in contexts such as Bhara Kahu, faith-based affirmative action has a profound impact on attitudes and behaviors towards environmental conservation. Traditionally, discussions surrounding sustainable development and conservation practices have been framed within a secular context, emphasizing the need for responsible management of resources, reduction of environmental harm, and promotion of sustainable lifestyles. However, these secular perspectives often fall short in mobilizing individuals and communities, particularly in societies where faith plays a central role. The results suggest that integrating faith into conservation strategies, rather than focusing solely on secular values, can catalyze transformative changes in attitudes and behaviors. By connecting environmental stewardship with religious teachings, individuals perceive their conservation efforts not only as a civic duty but also as a sacred obligation. This perception reorients environmental action from being an optional altruistic endeavor to a moral necessity.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFurthermore, this research highlights the potential of religious communities as powerful agents of change. The active participation of religious leaders in conservation initiatives provides these initiatives with a level of legitimacy and endorsement, encouraging wider community engagement. Thus, the involvement of faith leaders is essential in effectively mobilizing religious communities for environmental conservation. The incorporation of faith into environmental action brings an ethical dimension to conservation efforts. It reframes environmental stewardship as a moral duty, a manifestation of respect for God's creation, and a form of spiritual practice. This ethical framing resonates deeply with individuals' values and beliefs, prompting a profound shift in attitudes towards environmental conservation. It adds a moral urgency to conservation efforts, invoking not just a sense of responsibility, but also of morality and conscience.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn essence, the integration of faith-based affirmative action in environmental conservation initiatives signifies a shift from a largely utilitarian approach towards a more holistic, ethically grounded perspective. This approach acknowledges the interconnectedness of human spirituality, ethics, and the natural environment, and advocates for a more sustainable, equitable, and conscientious interaction with our planet.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe findings demonstrate the significant impact of faith-based affirmative action on attitudes, behaviours, and community participation in household solid waste management and environmental conservation, align with and extend the existing body of literature in this domain. Our findings resonate with the work of Bergmann (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e), who explored the intersection of climate impact studies and religion, suggesting that religious teachings can influence human and cultural dimensions of environmental conservation. Similarly, our study found that the introduction of religious teachings in the context of environmental conservation resulted in a marked shift in attitudes, with participants viewing waste management not merely as a civic duty, but as a religious obligation. Bloomfield (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e) also highlighted the potential of religion to intervene in environmentalism, suggesting that religious teachings can influence responses to climate change. This is consistent with our findings, which showed that participants began to perceive their involvement in environmental conservation as an integral part of their faith practice.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe significant level of community participation observed in our study, particularly among women and children, echoes the findings of Chitando, Conradie, and Kilonzo (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e), who suggested that religious beliefs can be used to respond and adapt to the challenges posed by climate change. This aligns with our observation that participants cited religious teachings on stewardship and communal responsibility as the primary motivators for their participation.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe role of faith leaders in driving community participation, as observed in our study, is also supported by the work of Mrozowska and Hintz (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR65\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e), who found that church authorities can influence climate policy in the European Union. Similarly, we found that the involvement of faith leaders in our project added credibility and motivated the community to engage actively.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eOur findings extend the work of Shoko (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR75\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e), who argued that African Traditional Religion (ATR) can contribute towards mitigating the effects of climate change. We found that the infusion of environmental stewardship principles within the broader teachings of Islam instigated a new perspective on the role of individuals in preserving their environment. The active involvement of religious leaders in the community's environmental conservation efforts, as observed in our study, aligns with the findings of Murray and Xing (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR66\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e), who suggested that religion can influence climate responses. In our study, religious leaders used their influence to spread environmental awareness, further illustrating the profound impact of faith-based affirmative action.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eIn contemplating the terrain of environmental conservation, the exploration of faith-based affirmative action emerges as a substantial component. The current study focuses on these entwined strands of faith, community action, and environmental stewardship. The ebb and flow of our findings weave a compelling narrative: faith is not merely a passive bystander but a potent catalyst in the promotion of environmental conservation within the urban confluence of Bhara Kahu, Pakistan.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eRefracting the light of faith-based affirmative action through the prism of household solid waste management revealed compelling shifts in attitudes and behaviours. Our study, like an archaeologist unearthing hidden relics, discovered the profound transformation of mundane waste management routines into acts imbued with a sense of sacred duty and profound communal responsibility. This resulted in a vibrant tapestry of community engagement, where environmental stewardship became not just an act of civic duty, but a lived expression of faith.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eMoreover, the powerful current of community participation underscored the potential of faith as a mobilizing force. The surging involvement of women and children, often marginalized in such initiatives, sends ripples across traditional gender roles and power dynamics, challenging prevailing norms and forging new societal frontiers. This transformative potential of faith-based affirmative action in driving active participation constitutes a significant stride in galvanizing collective action towards environmental conservation.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eBroader implications of our research findings permeate beyond the local context, resonating with global discourses around environmental conservation. The research unveils the versatile nature of faith as an agent of environmental change, a potential that, though enacted within the specificity of Bhara Kahu, can be translated into different religious and cultural contexts. This emergent universality reconfigures the concept of faith-based affirmative action as a global strategy, sparking a reevaluation of environmental policies and practices.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eWhile faith-based initiatives are a potent tool, their role within the vast machinery of sustainable development is complex and multifaceted. Nonetheless, the study paints a promising panorama where faith-based affirmative action strategies could bridge the chasm between current practices and sustainable environmental conservation, driving a paradigm shift towards sustainable development.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eHowever, this research, akin to an uncharted territory with hidden landscapes, is not devoid of limitations. The specific socio-cultural milieu of Bhara Kahu, while rich in its distinct religious fabric, may not be seamlessly transferable to other regions or contexts. Additionally, the focus on household solid waste management, although critical, is but one facet of the kaleidoscope of environmental conservation. Future explorations could journey into the unexplored terrains of other aspects of environmental conservation.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn conclusion, the research reverberates with the echoes of faith, revealing its power to shape attitudes and inspire action towards environmental conservation. In the symphony of sustainable development, faith-based affirmative action emerges not as a solitary note but as a resonating chord, harmonizing the melody of environmental stewardship. Despite the limitations, the study charts new territories in the nexus of faith and environmental conservation, providing a novel lens through which we can reimagine and redesign our collective efforts towards a sustainable future.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Fatima Jinnah Women University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan (Approval ID: Ref No 20-LCF-152/RGM/R\u0026amp;D/HEC/2020). Approval was granted on 08 May 2021, prior to the commencement of any research activities. All research was performed in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The scope of approval covered the full study protocol, including participant recruitment, informed consent procedures, data collection, and confidentiality measures involving human participants.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ch2\u003eConsent to participate\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eWe obtained verbal consent from each participant to participate in this study.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eFunding details\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFirst and second authors received funding from the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan, that supports this research.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAuthors Contribution\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eFirst and second authors: Conceptualisation; data collection; validation; writing the first draft. Third and Forth authors: Conceptualisation; data collection; validation; writing\u0026mdash;review and editing.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eData availability statement\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe data can be provided as per request.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAdams WM (2006), January The future of sustainability: Re-thinking environment and development in the twenty-first century. In Report of the IUCN renowned thinkers meeting (Vol. 29, No. 31)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAustin BJ, Robinson CJ, Fitzsimons JA, Sandford M, Ens EJ, Macdonald JM, Garnett ST (2018) Integrated measures of Indigenous land and sea management effectiveness: challenges and opportunities for improved conservation partnerships in Australia. Conserv Soc 16(3):372\u0026ndash;384\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBaruth M, Wilcox S (2013) Multiple behavior change among church members taking part in the faith, activity, and nutrition program. J Nutr Educ Behav 45(5):428\u0026ndash;434\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBauman WA (2014) Religion and ecology: Developing a planetary ethic. Columbia University\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBeder S (2000) Costing the earth: Equity, sustainable development and environmental economics. New Z J Environ Law 4:227\u0026ndash;244\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBergmann S (2021) Weather religion and climate change. Routledge\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBergoglio J (2015) Laudato Si: On care for our common home. Vatican\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBerkes F (2007) Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(39), 15188\u0026ndash;15193\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBerkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2008) Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change. Cambridge University Press\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBhagwat SA, Dudley N, Harrop SR (2011) Religious following in biodiversity hotspots: challenges and opportunities for conservation and development. Conserv Lett 4(3):234\u0026ndash;240\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBhagwat SA, Ormsby AA, Rutte C (2011) The Role of Religion in Linking Conservation and Development: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature \u0026amp; Culture, 5(1)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBloomfield EF (2019) Communication strategies for engaging climate skeptics: religion and the environment. Routledge\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBowen WG, Bok D (2016) The shape of the river: Long-term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions. The Shape of the River. Princeton University Press\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBrand F (2005) Ecological resilience and its relevance within a theory of sustainable development (No. 03/2005). UFZ-Bericht\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBryman A (2012) Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCallicott JB (1989) In defense of the land ethic: Essays in environmental philosophy. Suny\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChandler D (2004) Constructing global civil society: morality and power in international relations. Springer\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChapple CK (ed) (2006) Jainism and ecology: nonviolence in the web of life, vol 22. Motilal Banarsidass Publishe\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChitando E, Conradie EM, Kilonzo S (2022) African perspectives on religion and climate change. Routledge\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCochrane LL (2013) Land Degradation, Faith-Based Organizations, and Sustainability in S Enegal. Culture, Agriculture. Food Environ 35(2):112\u0026ndash;124\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eColding J, Folke C (2001) Social taboos:invisible systems of local resource management and biological conservation. Ecol Appl 11(2):584\u0026ndash;600\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCook J, Nuccitelli D, Green SA, Richardson M, Winkler B, Painting R, Skuce A (2016) Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming. Environ Res Lett 11(4):048002\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCorlett RT (2017) A bigger toolbox: biotechnology in biodiversity conservation. Trends Biotechnol 35(1):55\u0026ndash;65\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCui N, Wu T, Wang YC, Zou H, Axmacher JC, Sang W, Guo L (2022) Buddhist monasteries facilitated landscape conservation on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Landscape Ecol 37(6):1559\u0026ndash;1572\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDenzin NK, Lincoln YS (2018) Strategies of qualitative inquiry. Sage\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDjupe PA, Hunt PK (2009) Beyond the Lynn White thesis: Congregational effects on environmental concern. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48(4), 670\u0026ndash;686\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDudley N, Higgins-Zogib L, Mansourian S (2009) The links between protected areas, faiths, and sacred natural sites. Conserv Biol 23(3):568\u0026ndash;577\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEckberg DL, Blocker TJ (1989) Varieties of religious involvement and environmental concerns: Testing the Lynn White thesis. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 509\u0026ndash;517\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEckberg DL, Blocker TJ (1996) Christianity, environmentalism, and the theoretical problem of fundamentalism. J Sci Study Relig, 343\u0026ndash;355\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEkins P, Simon S, Deutsch L, Folke C, De Groot R (2003) A framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability. Ecol Econ 44(2\u0026ndash;3):165\u0026ndash;185\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eField CB, Barros VR (eds) (2014) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFolke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS, Walker B (2002) Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. AMBIO: J Hum Environ 31(5):437\u0026ndash;440\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFoltz R (2000) Is there an Islamic environmentalism? Environ Ethics 22(1):63\u0026ndash;72\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFoltz R (2003) Islam and ecology: A bestowed trust. Center for the Study of World Religions, Harvard Divinity School\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFoltz RC (2003) Worldviews, religion, and the environment: A global anthology. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGardner G (2002) Invoking the spirit: Religion and spirituality in the quest for a sustainable world. Worldwatch Paper 164:1\u0026ndash;49\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGardner GT (2006) Inspiring progress: religions' contributions to sustainable development. WW Norton \u0026amp; Company\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGarrard GE et al (2013) A general model of detectability using species traits. Methods Ecol Evol 4(1):45\u0026ndash;52\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGerten D, Bergmann S (2012) Religion in environmental and climate change: Suffering, values, lifestyles. Bloomsbury Publishing\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGiddings B, Hopwood B, O'Brien G (2002) Environment, economy and society: fitting them together into sustainable development. Sustain Dev 10(4):187\u0026ndash;196\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGoebbert K, Jenkins-Smith HC, Klockow K, Nowlin MC, Silva CL (2012) Weather, climate, and worldviews: The sources and consequences of public perceptions of changes in local weather patterns. Weather Clim Soc 4(2):132\u0026ndash;144\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGottlieb RS (ed) (2006) The Oxford handbook of religion and ecology. OUP USA\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGoudie AS (2018) Human impact on the natural environment. Wiley\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGrossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110(2):353\u0026ndash;377\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGuth JL, Green JC, Kellstedt LA, Smidt CE (1995) Faith and the environment: Religious beliefs and attitudes on environmental policy. Am J Polit Sci, 364\u0026ndash;382\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHand CM, Van Liere KD (1984) Religion, mastery-over-nature, and environmental concern. Soc Forces 63(2):555\u0026ndash;570\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHarris EJ (2008) Buddhism and ecology. In: Gerten D, Bergmann S (eds) Religion in environmental and climate change: Suffering, values, lifestyles. Bloomsbury Publishing, pp 117\u0026ndash;134\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHitzhusen GE, Tucker ME (2013) The potential of religion for Earth Stewardship. Front Ecol Environ 11(7):368\u0026ndash;376\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHolden E, Linnerud K, Banister D (2017) The imperatives of sustainable development. Sustain Dev 25(3):213\u0026ndash;226\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHolmberg J, Rob\u0026egrave;rt KH (2000) Backcasting-A framework for strategic planning. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol 7(4):291\u0026ndash;308\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHoornweg D, Bhada-Tata P (2012) What a waste: A global review of solid waste management. Urban Development \u0026amp; Local Government Unit: The World Bank\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eʻIzz al-Dīn MY (2000) The environmental dimensions of Islam. James Clarke \u0026amp; Co\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJenkins W (2009) After Lynn White: Religious ethics and environmental problems. J Relig Ethics 37(2):283\u0026ndash;309\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJenkins W, Chapple CK (2011) Religion and environment. Annu Rev Environ Resour 36:441\u0026ndash;463\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJohnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ, Turner LA (2007) Toward a definition of mixed methods research. J mixed methods Res 1(2):112\u0026ndash;133\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKearns L (1997) Noah's ark goes to Washington: A profile of evangelical environmentalism. Social Compass 44(3):349\u0026ndash;366\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKellert SR, Wilson EO (1995) The biophilia hypothesis. Island\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLe Qu\u0026eacute;r\u0026eacute; C, Andrew RM, Friedlingstein P, Sitch S, Hauck J, Pongratz J, Zheng B (2018) Global carbon budget 2018. Earth Syst Sci Data 10(4):2141\u0026ndash;2194\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLeach M, Stirling AC, Scoones I (2010) Dynamic sustainabilities: technology, environment, social justice. Taylor \u0026amp; Francis, p 232\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLewis SL, Maslin MA (2015) Defining the anthropocene. Nature 519(7542):171\u0026ndash;180\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMakarichi L, Jutidamrongphan W, Techato KA (2018) The evolution of waste-to-energy incineration: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 91:812\u0026ndash;821\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMalhotra KC (2008) Sacred Groves in India: An Overview. Conserving the Sacred for Biodiversity Management. Indira Gandhi Rashtriya Manav Sangrahalaya, New Delhi, India\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMebratu D (1998) Sustainability and sustainable development: historical and conceptual review. Environ Impact Assess Rev 18(6):493\u0026ndash;520\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMoloney S, Horne RE, Fien J (2010) Transitioning to low carbon communities\u0026mdash;from behaviour change to systemic change: Lessons from Australia. Energy policy 38(12):7614\u0026ndash;7623\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMrozowska S, Hintz M (2020) Religion and climate policy in the European Union. European Journal of Science and Theology V16 N5 (2020): 143\u0026ndash;156\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMurray G, Xing H (2020) Religion and Climate Change: Rain Rituals in Israel, China, and Haiti. Religions 11(11):554\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNorenzayan A, Shariff AF (2008) The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. Science 322(5898):58\u0026ndash;62\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePalmer M, Finlay V (2003) Faith in conservation: new approaches to religions and the environment. World Bank\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePearce D, Markandya A, Barbier EB (1989) Blueprint for a Green Economy. Earthscan\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRedclift M (2005) Sustainable development (1987\u0026ndash;2005): an oxymoron comes of age. Sustain Dev 13(4):212\u0026ndash;227\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRees WE (2018) Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. The Earthscan Reader in Rural-Urban Linkages. Routledge, pp 285\u0026ndash;297\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRobina Ramirez R, Pulido Fernandez M (2018) Religious travellers\u0026rsquo; improved attitude towards nature. Sustainability 10(9):3064\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSaniotis A (2012) Muslims and ecology: fostering Islamic environmental ethics. Contemp Islam 6(2):155\u0026ndash;171\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSheridan MJ (2008) The environmental and social history of African sacred groves: A Tanzanian case study. Afr Stud Rev 51(3):69\u0026ndash;98\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eShoko T (2022) African Traditional Religion and climate change: Perspectives from Zimbabwe. African Perspectives on Religion and Climate Change. Routledge, pp 22\u0026ndash;33\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSponsel LE (2012) Spiritual ecology: a quiet revolution. Bloomsbury Publishing USA\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSteffen W, Grinevald J, Crutzen P, McNeill J (2011) The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, physical and engineering sciences, 369(1938), 842\u0026ndash;867\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eStern DI (2004) The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev 32(8):1419\u0026ndash;1439\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTaylor B (2007) Exploring Religion, Nature and Culture\u0026ndash;Introducing the Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature \u0026amp; Culture, 1(1)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTaylor B (2016) Religion and environmentalism and America and beyond. In: Gottlieb RS (ed) The Oxford handbook of religion and ecology. Oxford University Press, pp 588\u0026ndash;612\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTaylor BR (2010) Dark green religion: Nature spirituality and the planetary future. University of California Press\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTaylor B, Van Wieren G (2016) Ecological resistance movements in religion and ethics: A reader. SUNY\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTirosh-Samuelson H (2002) Judaism and ecology: created world and revealed word. Harvard University Press for the Center for the Study of World Religions, Harvard Divinity School\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTomalin E (2002) The Limitations of Religious Environmentalism for India, Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology, 6(1), 12\u0026ndash;30. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1163/156853502760184577\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1163/156853502760184577\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTomalin E (2007) Religious studies and development: A literature review. International Development Department, University of Birmingham\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTomalin E (2009) Biodivinity and biodiversity: The limits to religious environmentalism. Ashgate Publishing, Surrey\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTukker A, Jansen B (2006) Environmental impacts of products: A detailed review of studies. J Ind Ecol 10(3):159\u0026ndash;182\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTurner RK (1995) Sustainable development and climate change. Studies in Environmental Science, vol 65. Elsevier, pp 55\u0026ndash;66\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUNEP (2021) Making peace with nature: A scientific blueprint to tackle the climate, biodiversity and pollution emergencies. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003evan der Ploeg J, Cauilan-Cureg M, van Weerd M, De Groot WT (2011) Assessing the effectiveness of environmental education: mobilizing public support for Philippine crocodile conservation. Conserv Lett 4(4):313\u0026ndash;323\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVan Huijstee MM, Francken M, Leroy P (2007) Partnerships for sustainable development: A review of current literature. Environ Sci 4(2):75\u0026ndash;89\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVeldman RG, Szasz A, Haluza-DeLay R (2013) How the world's religions are responding to climate change. Taylor \u0026amp; Francis, London\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVerschuuren B, Wild R, McNeeley J, Oviedo G (2010) Sacred natural sites: Conserving nature and culture. Earthscan\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM (1997) Human domination of Earth's ecosystems. Science 277(5325):494\u0026ndash;499\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVucetich JA, Nelson MP (2010) Sustainability: virtuous or vulgar? Bioscience 60(7):539\u0026ndash;544\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWardekker JA, Petersen AC, van Der Sluijs JP (2009) Ethics and public perception of climate change: Exploring the Christian voices in the US public debate. Glob Environ Change 19(4):512\u0026ndash;521\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWhite L (1967) The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. Science 155(3767):1203\u0026ndash;1207\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWoodrum E, Hoban T (1994) Theology and religiosity effects on environmentalism. Rev Religious Res, 193\u0026ndash;206\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"higher education commission of Pakistan","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Faith, Environment, behavior, Affirmative Action, Climate Change","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7944181/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7944181/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eFaith-based approaches are increasingly viewed as more effective than secular ones in shaping pro-environmental behaviors and attitudes. As industrialization and development projects accelerate, environmental degradation intensifies, prompting new strategies for sustainable development. One such strategy is the use of faith-based affirmative action programs that engage religious communities in environmental initiatives through targeted education and outreach. Pakistan, despite having one of the world\u0026rsquo;s largest Muslim populations and facing severe environmental challenges, has seen limited research on the intersection of faith and environmental conservation. This study addresses that gap by presenting empirical findings from a field-based research project conducted near Islamabad. Using various models, the study assesses whether religious belief influences community action, specifically in managing household solid waste. Findings indicate that faith significantly encourages positive environmental attitudes and active community participation. Field data further supports the conclusion that religiously framed programs can successfully mobilize communities for conservation. These results highlight the potential of faith-based affirmative action as a valuable policy tool for promoting sustainability, particularly in culturally and religiously rooted societies like Pakistan.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Faith-based Affirmative Action for Environmental Conservation: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-11-06 09:18:20","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7944181/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"f6138dc7-8919-458e-af90-17639bf4d398","owner":[],"postedDate":"November 6th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":56853023,"name":"Sociology"},{"id":56853024,"name":"Anthropology"},{"id":56853025,"name":"Environmental Policy"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-11-27T08:53:46+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-11-06 09:18:20","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-7944181","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-7944181","identity":"rs-7944181","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}