Assessing Human Liver Spheroids as a Model for Antiviral Drug Evaluation Against BSL-3 Haemorrhagic Fever viruses

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

The paper evaluated a ready-to-use 96-well human primary-cell liver spheroid model to assess antiviral activity against four BSL-3 hemorrhagic fever viruses, including two orthoflaviviruses (AHFV, YFV) and two Hareavirales order viruses (PIRV, a surrogate for new-world BSL-4 mammarenaviruses, and RVFV). They found that RVFV and PIRV replicated in the spheroids while the orthoflaviviruses did not, and robust RVFV replication required a high viral dose with low infectivity overall. The authors demonstrated antiviral activity of favipiravir, nitazoxanide, ribavirin, and galidesivir, but noted that higher doses were generally required in spheroids versus 2D culture (except for ribavirin), limiting the model as a critical selection step for antivirals. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Haemorrhagic fever viruses (HFVs) cause highly lethal syndromes with limited therapeutic options. Increasingly, 3D cell culture models are becoming an important tool in the field of virology. Since the liver is an important target for many HFVs, we evaluated a ready-to-use 96-well liver spheroid model composed of human primary cells for antiviral assessment. We worked with four biosafety level 3 (BSL-3) HFVs in this study: two orthoflaviviruses, Alkhumra haemorrhagic fever virus (AHFV) and yellow fever virus (YFV), and two viruses belonging to Hareavirales order, Pirital virus (PIRV), a surrogate for new-world BSL-4 mammarenaviruses, and Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV). We found that RVFV and PIRV were able of replicating in this model, whereas the orthoflaviviruses were not. A high viral dose was required for robust replication, and infectivity of RVFV in spheroids was low. We successfully demonstrated the antiviral activity of known broad-spectrum antiviral compounds— favipiravir, nitazoxanide, ribavirin, and galidesivir—despite some variability. However, except for ribavirin, higher doses were required in spheroids to detect antiviral effect compared to the 2D cell culture model. Overall, we conclude that while this model can provide valuable complementary information to traditional models, it should not be considered a critical selection step for antiviral compounds. More broadly, this model could be useful to study viral pathogenicity and host-pathogen interactions.
Full text 1,581 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Haemorrhagic fever viruses (HFVs) cause highly lethal syndromes with limited therapeutic options. Increasingly, 3D cell culture models are becoming an important tool in the field of virology. Since the liver is an important target for many HFVs, we evaluated a ready-to-use 96-well liver spheroid model composed of human primary cells for antiviral assessment. We worked with four biosafety level 3 (BSL-3) HFVs in this study: two orthoflaviviruses, Alkhumra haemorrhagic fever virus (AHFV) and yellow fever virus (YFV), and two viruses belonging to Hareavirales order, Pirital virus (PIRV), a surrogate for new-world BSL-4 mammarenaviruses, and Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV). We found that RVFV and PIRV were able of replicating in this model, whereas the orthoflaviviruses were not. A high viral dose was required for robust replication, and infectivity of RVFV in spheroids was low. We successfully demonstrated the antiviral activity of known broad-spectrum antiviral compounds— favipiravir, nitazoxanide, ribavirin, and galidesivir—despite some variability. However, except for ribavirin, higher doses were required in spheroids to detect antiviral effect compared to the 2D cell culture model. Overall, we conclude that while this model can provide valuable complementary information to traditional models, it should not be considered a critical selection step for antiviral compounds. More broadly, this model could be useful to study viral pathogenicity and host-pathogen interactions. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-06T02:00:05.402940+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0