Acronym Absurdity Constrains Psychological Science
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
Everyone hates acronyms. This is known. This essay focuses on a somewhat different issue, called acronym absurdity, which is how acronyms can have the power to constrain discovery and advancement, thereby shaping science in undesirable ways. It is called acronym absurdity because the use of acronyms can sometimes lead to rather strange outcomes that any reasonable, mildly detached observer can only deem absurd. This essay focuses on two broad classes of the problem: how catchy acronyms lead to bizarre and limiting choices, and how acronyms can lead to modifications that betray their original intention. It is plainly obvious that the general practice around acronyms is absurd and should largely be abandoned.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-06-06T02:00:05.402940+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0