Similarity bias from consensus perturbational signatures from the L1000 Connectivity Map
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
Abstract
The Next Generation L1000 Connectivity Map (L1000) is a massive, high-throughput dataset measuring transcriptional changes - or signatures - in cancer cell lines due to chemical and genetic perturbation. Zhu et al recently presented Deep Learning-Based Efficacy Prediction System (DLEPS), a method that models averages of many signatures (CTPs or meta-signatures) of the same compound across conditions. However, our analysis shows that averaging increasing numbers of signatures from L1000 results in a substantial positive increase in signature similarities even among entirely unrelated perturbations, drastically shifting the baseline threshold for similarity. Consequently, DLEPS overstates how informative the model is about each compound, highlighting the need to account for this similarity bias in any L1000 Connectivity Map analysis.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-06-06T02:00:05.402940+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0