Neuroscience is pre-paradigmatic. Consciousness is why
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
This essay argues that neuroscience remains pre-paradigmatic in the Kuhnian sense, lacking a unifying theoretical framework despite impressive methodological advances. The author contends that consciousness is the missing organising principle, analogous to evolution in biology. Drawing on evidence of reproducibility failures in neuroimaging and the field's reliance on 'cool' rather than fundamental findings, the piece calls for placing consciousness at the centre of neuroscience.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-06-05T02:00:03.366016+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0