Spatial environment drives land-based social associations in a central-place foraging seabird

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0

Abstract

1. Social and spatial environments shape the way individuals associate and thus impact their social network structure. However, nowhere are social and spatial mechanisms more likely to be simultaneously entangled and potentially misinterpreted than in central-place foragers. 2. We interrogated the spatial-social interface for a central-place forager in their colony. To do so we tested how the distance between individuals in a colony affected (i) their probability of association, (ii) their community structure, and (iii) and dyadic weight. 3. We used the Atlantic puffin (Fratercula arctica), a central-place forager that has limited movements on land, to determine the contribution of the social and spatial environments to the social network structure. We colour-banded 124 individuals, geo-localised their burrows and tracked their associations at the colony using focal observations during the breeding season. 4. We found that the spatial environment strongly influenced the social network structure of the Atlantic puffin. Individuals formed communities and associated significantly more than expected by chance with their close nesting neighbours, suggesting that the presence/absence of neighbours determined the association patterns. Additionally, we found evidence that distant associations with conspecifics were not all random, suggesting that individuals may seek each other out, if it provides mutual benefits, or have similar spatial and temporal requirements. 5. Our study demonstrates the importance of considering social and spatial environments in unison in studying social network structures and provides new evidence for the influence of these mechanisms on central-place foragers.
Full text 2,558 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 4 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 4 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Social and spatial environments shape the way individuals associate and thus impact their social network structure. However, nowhere are social and spatial mechanisms more likely to be simultaneously entangled and potentially misinterpreted than in colonial species. The Atlantic puffin is a colonial seabird that nests in an underground burrow. Therefore, they are less limited in their land-based movements than open-nesting seabirds. We colour-banded 124 individuals, georeferenced their burrows and tracked their associations at the colony using a scan sampling approach during the breeding season to understand how the spatial distribution of the burrows constrained their associations. We tested how the distance between nests in a colony affected (i) individual probability of association and dyadic weight, and (ii) their community structure. We also tested for the presence of non-random associations across different distances. We found that the distance between burrows strongly influenced the social network structure of Atlantic puffins. Individuals associated more often with neighbours and did not seem to favour associations with specific adults attending adjacent nests. However, contrary to expectation, we found that groups of individuals formed communities and evidence that distant associations with conspecifics were not all random. We suggest that individuals may seek each other out, if it provides mutual benefits, or have similar spatial and temporal requirements. Our study demonstrates the importance of considering spatial constraints in studying social network structures and provides new evidence for their impact on colonial animals. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2CS67 Animal Studies Atlantic puffin, behavioural ecology, central-place forager, Familiarity, social environment, social network, spatial environment Published: 2025-01-17 08:24 Last Updated: 2026-03-13 12:02 CC-By Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare having no conflict of interest Data and Code Availability Statement: data/code available upon request Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-05T02:00:03.366016+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0