Are CLO Collateral and Tranche Ratings Disconnected?
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Between March and August 2020, S&P and Moody's downgraded approximately 25% of collateral feeding into CLOs and only 2% of tranche values, with rating actions concentrating in junior tranches. This paper examines explanations for this potential rating disconnect. We find no evidence that: rating agency model-implied risk disproportionately affect junior tranches, collateral downgrades were too severe, CLOs accumulated pre-COVID protective cushions, or value-creation through active management. Instead, we find evidence consistent with both non-model considerations by rating agencies and strategic CLO manager trading. The end result is that CLOs are considerably riskier than their current ratings suggest.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-06-05T02:00:03.366016+00:00