Directional selection failed to produce changes in olfactory Y-maze learning and memory but induced changes in climbing phenotypes

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Learning and memory are fundamental complex traits that allow for assessment and response to changes in their environment. Beyond cognition, these high order traits require several subcomponents, from sensory perception to motor output, in order to execute the intended response to a stimulus. Within the population, we see variation among individuals in abilities to perform learning and memory tasks. It is still largely unknown what genetic factors contribute to variability in these phenotypes; therefore, our study aims to gain better insight by utilizing a directional selection paradigm to drive differences in olfactory learning and memory behavior. Directional selection experiments allow for evaluation of the response to selective pressures across multiple biological levels through amplification of phenotype differences between groups. We used a reward based olfactory associative learning and memory assay to train a synthetic population of flies allowing only those who passed both tests to mate across ten generations. Our study shows significant changes in the climbing subcomponent required to perform well on the y-maze assay, however, we did not observe any significant changes to olfactory learning and memory behavior.
Full text 1,327 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Learning and memory are fundamental complex traits that allow for assessment and response to changes in their environment. Beyond cognition, these high order traits require several subcomponents, from sensory perception to motor output, in order to execute the intended response to a stimulus. Within the population, we see variation among individuals in abilities to perform learning and memory tasks. It is still largely unknown what genetic factors contribute to variability in these phenotypes; therefore, our study aims to gain better insight by utilizing a directional selection paradigm to drive differences in olfactory learning and memory behavior. Directional selection experiments allow for evaluation of the response to selective pressures across multiple biological levels through amplification of phenotype differences between groups. We used a reward based olfactory associative learning and memory assay to train a synthetic population of flies allowing only those who passed both tests to mate across ten generations. Our study shows significant changes in the climbing subcomponent required to perform well on the y-maze assay, however, we did not observe any significant changes to olfactory learning and memory behavior. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-05T02:00:03.366016+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0