Autonomous neuronal resilience under metabolic stress highlights fundamental differences between hESC and hiPSC-derived neurons

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) aim to replicate the developmental and functional capacity of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). Here, we identify neuronal resilience under metabolic stress as a critical parameter for benchmarking equivalence. Without medium replenishment, hESC-derived cortical neurons underwent neural resurrection —a spontaneous recovery marked by increased cell density, preserved morphology, and sustained calcium signaling and mitochondrial function for 23 days. In contrast, hiPSC-derived neurons survived but showed reduced adaptability, deteriorating within 10–14 days despite higher initial densities. Our findings introduce a physiologically relevant assay for stress resilience and highlight the need to optimize hiPSC differentiation to achieve hESC-like performance, improving their translational value for disease modeling and regenerative therapy.
Full text 981 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) aim to replicate the developmental and functional capacity of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). Here, we identify neuronal resilience under metabolic stress as a critical parameter for benchmarking equivalence. Without medium replenishment, hESC-derived cortical neurons underwent neural resurrection—a spontaneous recovery marked by increased cell density, preserved morphology, and sustained calcium signaling and mitochondrial function for 23 days. In contrast, hiPSC-derived neurons survived but showed reduced adaptability, deteriorating within 10–14 days despite higher initial densities. Our findings introduce a physiologically relevant assay for stress resilience and highlight the need to optimize hiPSC differentiation to achieve hESC-like performance, improving their translational value for disease modeling and regenerative therapy. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-05T02:00:03.366016+00:00