Escaping the net: Assessing midwater gear selectivity for the Joint United States and Canada Integrated Ecosystem and Pacific hake (Merluccius productus) Acoustic-Trawl survey

2025 · doi:10.32942/x29q11
preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
🔓 Open OA copy Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Acoustic-trawl surveys use trawl catches to validate the species and size composition of fish aggregations detected acoustically. However, certain sizes of fish may be more likely to escape some trawls, which can bias the size and age distribution of the catch used to estimate biomass. To quantify size-selectivity, we studied 3 midwater trawls used for the United States and Canada joint survey of Pacific hake (Merluccius productus). The survey most recently used an Aleutian Wing Trawl (AWT) with different codend liners until 2023, then switched to a Multi-Function Trawl (MFT) in 2025. To prepare for the switch, we assessed differences in escapement and catch rates using recapture nets, and in paired trawls of both net-types sampling the same aggregations. All nets retained greater than 85% of hake longer than 30-cm (age 2+). In general, the MFT was more efficient than the AWT, with near full retention of all sizes. A substantial fraction of small hake (age 0 to 1) escaped the AWT. A power analysis indicated a low probability of detecting differences in escapement from the AWT with different liners. Gear selectivity information is important to improve the accuracy of fishery survey data and account for changes in sampling gear.
Full text 2,029 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Acoustic-trawl surveys use trawl catches to validate the species and size composition of fish aggregations detected acoustically. However, certain sizes of fish may be more likely to escape some trawls, which can bias the size and age distribution of the catch used to estimate biomass. To quantify size-selectivity, we studied 3 midwater trawls used for the United States and Canada joint survey of Pacific hake (Merluccius productus). The survey most recently used an Aleutian Wing Trawl (AWT) with different codend liners until 2023, then switched to a Multi-Function Trawl (MFT) in 2025. To prepare for the switch, we assessed differences in escapement and catch rates using recapture nets, and in paired trawls of both net-types sampling the same aggregations. All nets retained greater than 85% of hake longer than 30-cm (age 2+). In general, the MFT was more efficient than the AWT, with near full retention of all sizes. A substantial fraction of small hake (age 0 to 1) escaped the AWT. A power analysis indicated a low probability of detecting differences in escapement from the AWT with different liners. Gear selectivity information is important to improve the accuracy of fishery survey data and account for changes in sampling gear. https://doi.org/10.32942/X29Q11 Life Sciences Pacific hake, gear selectivity, midwater trawl nets, acoustic-trawl survey Published: 2025-12-19 08:23 Last Updated: 2025-12-19 08:23 CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Conflict of interest statement: None Data and Code Availability Statement: Data and code are available upon reasonable request. Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-05T02:00:03.366016+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0