Preferred treatment of infertile women older than 37 years of age who demonstrate premature luteinization in the first evaluation cycle
article
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary
This study investigated the preferred treatment strategies for infertile women over 37 exhibiting premature luteinization during their initial evaluation cycle.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of various treatments in abolishing premature luteinization in infertile women over 37 years old who are undergoing ovulation induction.DesignProspective, nonrandomized study.SettingTertiary care medical clinic.Patient(s)Seventeen infertile women >37 years old in whom premature luteinization was detected during their evaluation (pretreatment) cycle.Intervention(s)The patients underwent three consecutive treatment cycles with clomiphene citrate (group A), hMG (group B), and a GnRH agonist plus hMG (group C).Main outcome measure(s)Premature luteinization, defined as a progesterone/E2 ratio of >1 on the day of hCG administration.Result(s)Fifteen (88%) of the 17 patients in group A and 13 (76%) of the 17 patients in group B demonstrated premature luteinization. In contrast, only 1 (6%) of the 17 patients in group C had a progesterone/E2 ratio of >1 on the day of hCG administration. The mean (+/-SD) E2 level on the day of hCG administration was significantly higher in group C (1.236 +/- 772.7 pg/mL) than in group A (214.02 +/- 104.46 pg/mL) or group B (412.5 +/- 337 pg/mL).Conclusion(s)Pituitary desensitization with a GnRH agonist in conjunction with hMG may be of benefit for older infertile women who demonstrate early luteinization in their first evaluation cycle.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cited by (1)
References (31)
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58677-4 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57974-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57495-0 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57066-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54186-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00561-x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54735-9 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138630 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54079-5 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138086 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57049-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136482 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1985.tb01113.x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59828-8 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57287-2 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53343-3 via openalex
- W104737984 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60437-5 via openalex
- doi:10.1210/endo-125-3-1739 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137016 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/7.suppl_1.49 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55933-0 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54964-4 via openalex
- doi:10.1210/endo-117-4-1500 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)47536-9 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55564-2 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)49220-4 via openalex
- doi:10.1136/bmj.296.6639.1765 via openalex
- doi:10.1210/endo-123-2-1205 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81518-x via openalex
- doi:10.1210/jcem-73-4-797 via openalex
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T05:37:28.352103+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-06-05T02:00:03.366016+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK