Comparative cross-species transcriptomic analysis identifies new candidates of Pooideae nitrate response

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
Full text 2,000 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Nitrogen fertilizers are essential for crop productivity but cause environmental harm, necessitating the development of cultivars that thrive under limited nitrogen. This study investigates the transcriptomic response to nitrate in Arabidopsis thaliana (a model dicot), Brachypodium distachyon (a model Pooideae), and Hordeum vulgare (barley, a domesticated Pooideae) to identify conserved and species-specific molecular mechanisms. Using RNA-seq after 1.5 and 3 hours of nitrate treatment, we found that core nitrate-responsive biological processes - such as nitrate transport, assimilation, carbon metabolism, and hormone signaling - are largely conserved across species. However, comparative analysis at gene level based on orthology revealed specificities between the species. For instance, rRNA processing was uniquely stimulated in Arabidopsis, while cysteine biosynthesis from serine and gibberellin biosynthesis were specifically regulated in Brachypodium and barley. Orthologs of key nitrate-responsive genes (e.g., NRT, NLP, TCP20) exhibited variable regulation, reflecting potential adaptations linked to domestication or nutrient acquisition strategies. These findings highlight the importance of integrating model and crop species to uncover targets for improving nitrogen use efficiency in cereals. This study provides a general pipeline combining Gene Ontology enrichment and orthology analysis to compare transcriptomic responses across species. This workflow is highly useful for any comparative transcriptomic study in which differences in annotation quality and gene divergence between genomes may bias interpretation. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes The manuscript has been thoroughly revised to improve clarity and conciseness and to correct the English language. No changes have been made to the scientific content, figures, tables, or interpretations. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE317477

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-05T02:00:03.366016+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0