Context-Dependent Synergism and Antagonism between IGF2BP1/3 and METTL3/14 in m6A-mediated mRNA regulation

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

N-6 Methyl Adenosine (m6A) methylation is primarily found in the 3'-UTRs of mRNAs, near the stop codon, and at consensus sequence RRACH. The methylation reaction is catalyzed by RNA methyltransferases METTL3 and METTL14, known as writers. Readers recognize the modified mRNA, which influences mRNA stability and translation. Insulin-like growth factor-2 binding proteins 1 and 3 (IGF2BP1 and IGF2BP3) are known m6A readers, promoting mRNA stabilization. Erasers like ALKBH5 and FTO remove m6A modifications. Dysregulation of m6A machinery has been implicated in cancer progression. We analyzed the expression patterns of writers, erasers, and readers (WERs) in multiple public datasets, including NCBI-GEO, TCGA, TARGET, and normal tissue expression data from GTEx. Our findings revealed widespread dysregulation of WERs across various cancers. To investigate whether IGF2BP1/3 and METTL3/14 function synergistically in mRNA stabilization, we identified direct mRNA targets using intersection analyses of IGF2BP1/3 eCLIP and METTL3/14 knockout (KO) datasets on Galaxy server. This analysis identified METTL14-dependent targets (KDM3B, DYNLL1, CNOT1, RPL29) and METTL3-dependent targets (SREBF2, HNF4A, GNA11), all bound by IGF2BP1/3. To validate these interactions, we cloned 3'-UTRs of these targets downstream of luciferase reporter and assessed mRNA stability following IGF2BP1/3 and METTL3/14 overexpression. Luciferase activity increased for RPL29, DYNLL1, SREBF2, and CNOT1 upon co-expression, indicating IGF2BP1/3-mediated mRNA stabilization in an m6A-dependent manner. In contrast, KDM3B, HNF4A, and GNA11 exhibited reduced luciferase activity, suggesting destabilization. Our study provides novel evidence that m6A readers and writers exhibit synergistic and antagonistic interactions in a target-dependent manner, underscoring the complexity of m6A-mediated gene regulation in oncogenesis.
Full text 1,986 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract N-6 Methyl Adenosine (m6A) methylation is primarily found in the 3’-UTRs of mRNAs, near the stop codon, and at consensus sequence RRACH. The methylation reaction is catalyzed by RNA methyltransferases METTL3 and METTL14, known as writers. Readers recognize the modified mRNA, which influences mRNA stability and translation. Insulin-like growth factor-2 binding proteins 1 and 3 (IGF2BP1 and IGF2BP3) are known m6A readers, promoting mRNA stabilization. Erasers like ALKBH5 and FTO remove m6A modifications. Dysregulation of m6A machinery has been implicated in cancer progression. We analyzed the expression patterns of writers, erasers, and readers (WERs) in multiple public datasets, including NCBI-GEO, TCGA, TARGET, and normal tissue expression data from GTEx. Our findings revealed widespread dysregulation of WERs across various cancers. To investigate whether IGF2BP1/3 and METTL3/14 function synergistically in mRNA stabilization, we identified direct mRNA targets using intersection analyses of IGF2BP1/3 eCLIP and METTL3/14 knockout (KO) datasets on Galaxy server. This analysis identified METTL14-dependent targets (KDM3B, DYNLL1, CNOT1, RPL29) and METTL3-dependent targets (SREBF2, HNF4A, GNA11), all bound by IGF2BP1/3. To validate these interactions, we cloned 3’-UTRs of these targets downstream of luciferase reporter and assessed mRNA stability following IGF2BP1/3 and METTL3/14 overexpression. Luciferase activity increased for RPL29, DYNLL1, SREBF2, and CNOT1 upon co-expression, indicating IGF2BP1/3-mediated mRNA stabilization in an m6A-dependent manner. In contrast, KDM3B, HNF4A, and GNA11 exhibited reduced luciferase activity, suggesting destabilization. Our study provides novel evidence that m6A readers and writers exhibit synergistic and antagonistic interactions in a target-dependent manner, underscoring the complexity of m6A-mediated gene regulation in oncogenesis. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-05T02:00:03.366016+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0