Urban Environmental Legislation and Green Innovation

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract With the panel data of 218 prefecture-level cities from 2003 to 2017, this paper empirically tested whether urban environmental legislation realized Porter Hypothesis(PH) in China. After a series of model estimation and robustness tests, the results show that urban environmental legislation increased the number of local green patents, which means that the weak Porter Hypothesis was established. However, the urban environmental legislation did not lead to an increase in green total factor productivity(GTFP). In other words, the strong version of PH did not hold. Further analysis shows that urban environmental legislation led to the decline of GTFP and the increase of green patents in the west of China, but not in the east and central cities. Besides, the legislation did not promote GTFP improvement through green innovation in the short term, which means it did not realize process compensation.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-05T02:00:03.366016+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0