Enhancing and Personalising Endometriosis Care with Causal Machine Learning

In: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems · 2024 · pp. 3–25 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-74443-3_1 · W4405598751
book-chapter OA: green CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-06

This paper proposes a novel, personalized, non-invasive diagnostic approach for endometriosis leveraging causal machine learning on patient-reported symptoms and health records to improve prediction accuracy and reduce diagnostic delays.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-06 · read from full text

The paper discusses using causal machine learning with patient-reported symptom data, along with health records and other factors, to create a personalized, non-invasive diagnostic approach for endometriosis screening and to reduce lengthy diagnostic delays. It describes a framework intended to understand underlying causes of symptoms and improve prediction accuracy and diagnostic efficiency, with the goal of enabling more tailored care and globally usable implementation. The main caveat is that it is primarily a proposal/chapter-level discussion of potential rather than a detailed reporting of study results in a specific population. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it focuses on enhancing and personalising endometriosis care using causal machine learning applied to symptom data and related factors.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 8,396 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 3 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Endometriosis poses significant challenges in diagnosis and management due to the wide range of varied symptoms and systemic implications. Integrating machine learning into healthcare screening processes can significantly enhance and optimise resource allocation and diagnostic efficiency, and facilitate more tailored and personalised treatment plans. This paper discusses the potential of leveraging patient-reported symptom data through causal machine learning to advance endometriosis care and reduce the lengthy diagnostic delays associated with this condition. The goal is to propose a novel personalised non-invasive diagnostic approach that understands the underlying causes of patient symptoms and combines health records and other factors to enhance prediction accuracy, providing an approach that can be utilised globally. Bowles is partially supported by the Austrian Funding Council (FWF) under Meitner M 3338-N. Access this chapter Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout Purchases are for personal use only Similar content being viewed by others

References

Agarwal, S.K., et al.: Clinical diagnosis of endometriosis: a call to action. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 220(4), 354-e1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.12.039 Ballweg, M.L.: Impact of endometriosis on women’s health: comparative historical data show that the earlier the onset, the more severe the disease. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 18(2), 201–218 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.01.003 Blass, I., Sahar, T., Shraibman, A., Ofer, D., Rappoport, N., Linial, M.: Revisiting the risk factors for endometriosis: a machine learning approach. J. Personalized Med. 12(7), 1114 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12071114 Burton, C., Iversen, L., Bhattacharya, S., Ayansina, D., Saraswat, L., Sleeman, D.: Pointers to earlier diagnosis of endometriosis: a nested case-control study using primary care electronic health records. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 67(665), e816–e823 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17x693497 Conroy, I., et al.: Pelvic pain: what are the symptoms and predictors for surgery, endometriosis and endometriosis severity. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 61(5), 765–772 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13379 Cox, H., Henderson, L., Andersen, N., Cagliarini, G., Ski, C.: Focus group study of endometriosis: struggle, loss and the medical merry-go-round. Int. J. Nurs. Pract. 9(1), 2–9 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-172x.2003.00396.x Eskenazi, B., Warner, M.L.: Epidemiology of endometriosis. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. North Am. 24(2), 235–258 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-8545(05)70302-8 Fauconnier, A., et al.: Early identification of women with endometriosis by means of a simple patient-completed questionnaire screening tool: a diagnostic study. Fertil. Steril. 116(6), 1580–1589 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.07.1205 Goldstein, A., Cohen, S.: Self-report symptom-based endometriosis prediction using machine learning. Sci. Rep. 13(1), 5499 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32761-8 Gordon, H.G., Mooney, S.S., Conroy, I.C., Grover, S.R.: When pain is not the whole story: presenting symptoms of women with endometriosis. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 62(3), 434–438 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13482 Hine, A.A., Kuster Filipe Bowles, J., Webber, T.: The need for a non-invasive technology for endometriosis detection and care. In: Caring is Sharing-Exploiting the Value in Data for Health and Innovation (2023). https://doi.org/10.3233/shti230073 Iroju, O.G., Olaleke, J.O.: A systematic review of natural language processing in healthcare. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Comput. Sci. 8, 44–50 (2015). https://doi.org/10.5815/ijitcs.2015.08.07 Kleczyk, E.J., et al.: Predicting endometriosis onset using machine learning algorithms. BMC Women’s Health (preprint under review) (2020). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-135736/v1 Kruk, M.E., et al.: High-quality health systems in the sustainable development goals era: time for a revolution. Lancet Glob. Health 6(11), e1196–e1252 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30386-3 Malvezzi, H., Marengo, E.B., Podgaec, S., de Azevedo Piccinato, C.: Endometriosis: current challenges in modeling a multifactorial disease of unknown etiology. J. Transl. Med. 18, 1–21 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02471-0 Markham, S.M., Carpenter, S.E., Rock, J.A.: Extrapelvic endometriosis. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. North Am. 16(1), 193–219 (1989) McKee, M., Wouters, O.J.: The challenges of regulating artificial intelligence in healthcare: comment on “clinical decision support and new regulatory frameworks for medical devices: are we ready for it?-A viewpoint paper”. Int. J. Health Policy Manag. 12 (2023). https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7261 Nnoaham, K.E., Hummelshoj, L., Kennedy, S.H., Jenkinson, C., Zondervan, K.T.: World endometriosis research foundation women’s health symptom survey consortium. Developing symptom-based predictive models of endometriosis as a clinical screening tool: results from a multicenter study. Fertil. Steril. 98(3), 692–701 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.04.022 Pearl, J.: Causality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803161 Pergialiotis, V., et al.: The utility of artificial neural networks and classification and regression trees for the prediction of endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women. Public Health 164, 1–6 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2018.07.012 Richens, J.G., Lee, C.M., Johri, S.: Improving the accuracy of medical diagnosis with causal machine learning. Nat. Commun. 11(1), 3923 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17419-7 Rogers, P.A., et al.: Priorities for endometriosis research: recommendations from an international consensus workshop. Reprod. Sci. 16, 335–346 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719108330568 Rolla, E.: Endometriosis: advances and controversies in classification, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. F1000Research 8 (2019). https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.14817.1 Sankaravadivel, V., Thalavaipillai, S.: Symptoms based endometriosis prediction using machine learning. Bull. Electr. Eng. Inform. 10(6), 3102–3109 (2021). https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v10i6.3254 Shafrir, A.L., et al.: Risk for and consequences of endometriosis: a critical epidemiologic review. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 51, 1–15 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.06.001 Simoens, S., et al.: The burden of endometriosis: costs and quality of life of women with endometriosis and treated in referral centres. Hum. Reprod. 27(5), 1292–1299 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des073 Sivajohan, B., Elgendi, M., Menon, C., Allaire, C., Yong, P., Bedaiwy, M.A.: Clinical use of artificial intelligence in endometriosis: a scoping review. NPJ Digit. Med. 5(1), 109 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00638-1

Acknowledgement

We thank Thomas Ebner from the Kinderwunsch Zentrum, Kepler Universitätsklinikum, Linz, for valuable insights into the processes in the Austrian healthcare system. We thank the team from the School of Nursing, University of São Paulo, Brazil, led by Lislaine Aparecida Fracolli with Ana Luiza Vilela Borges, Carla Marins Silva and Marlise de Oliveira Pimentel Lima, for ongoing discussions on the Brazilian perspective of endometriosis care. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Editor information Editors and Affiliations Rights and permissions Copyright information © 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG About this paper Cite this paper Hine, A., Webber, T., Bowles, J. (2024). Enhancing and Personalising Endometriosis Care with Causal Machine Learning. In: Naik, N., Jenkins, P., Prajapat, S., Grace, P. (eds) Contributions Presented at The International Conference on Computing, Communication, Cybersecurity and AI, July 3–4, 2024, London, UK. C3AI 2024. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 884. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-74443-3_1 Download citation DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-74443-3_1 Published: Publisher Name: Springer, Cham Print ISBN: 978-3-031-74442-6 Online ISBN: 978-3-031-74443-3 eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)Springer Nature Proceedings excluding Computer Science

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (27)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK