Beyond single invaders: Disentangling the effects of co-invading alien herbs on sandy old-fields

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-04 · read from full text

This study investigated how two invasive alien herbs, Asclepias syriaca and Solidago spp. (including S. gigantea and S. canadensis), individually and together affect plant taxonomic and functional diversity in sandy old-fields in Central Hungary, using 80 plots with varying invasive cover and generalized linear and mixed models. Solidago cover significantly reduced resident species richness and community completeness, whereas Asclepias showed no significant effect. When invasive species traits were excluded, only community-weighted means and Rao functional diversity of the bud bank index were significantly associated with Solidago cover, but including invasives’ traits showed that their trait values significantly influenced community indices. The study reports no interaction between Asclepias and Solidago effects, and it notes that trait-based mechanisms for reduced richness under Solidago dominance require further study, with reliance on trait data from databases. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Aims: Invasive alien plants can severely impact ecosystem diversity and function. While individual species’ effects are often studied, the interaction between multiple invasive species is less understood. This study examines how Asclepias syriaca and Solidago spp. (including Solidago gigantea and S. canadensis) influence taxonomic and functional diversity in sandy old-fields. The aims are to: (1) assess the individual and combined impacts of Asclepias and Solidago on resident plant diversity, and (2) determine whether interactions between these species alter their effects on the invaded community. Location Gödöllő Hills, Central Hungary. Methods I sampled 80 plots (2m × 2m) with varying levels of Asclepias and Solidago cover. Plant species cover was visually estimated, and trait data were obtained from databases. Species richness, community completeness, and community-weighted means (CWM) for traits like plant height and seed mass were calculated, along with Rao functional diversity. Generalized linear and mixed models were used to evaluate the effect of invasive cover on resident diversity and traits, both with and without considering the invasives' traits in community metrics. Results Solidago cover significantly reduced species richness and community completeness, while Asclepias showed no significant effect. When invasive species traits were excluded from the analysis, only the CWM and Rao diversity of the bud bank score were significantly related to Solidago cover. Including the invasives’ traits revealed that their trait values influenced community metrics significantly. Asclepias and Solidago cover were negatively correlated, but did not alter each other’s effects. Conclusions Solidago has a stronger negative impact on resident species richness than Asclepias, which appears neutral. The lack of interaction between these invaders suggests their individual impacts dominate over potential synergies or antagonisms.
Full text 2,672 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Aims Invasive alien plants can severely impact ecosystem diversity and function. While individual species’ effects are often studied, the interaction between multiple invasive species is less understood. This study examines how Asclepias syriaca and Solidago spp. (including Solidago gigantea and S. canadensis) influence taxonomic and functional diversity in sandy old-fields. The aims are to: (1) assess the individual and combined impacts of Asclepias and Solidago on resident plant diversity, and (2) determine whether interactions between these species alter their effects on the invaded community. Location Gödöllő Hills, Central Hungary.

Methods

I sampled 80 plots (2m × 2m) on sandy old-fields with varying levels of Asclepias and Solidago cover. Plant species cover was visually estimated, and trait data were obtained from databases. Species richness, community completeness, and community-weighted means (CWM) for plant traits, along with Rao functional diversity. Generalized linear and mixed models were used to evaluate the effect of invasive cover on resident diversity and traits, both with and without considering the invasives' traits in community indices.

Results

While Asclepias showed no significant effect, Solidago cover significantly reduced species richness and community completeness. When invasive species traits were excluded from the analysis, only the CWM and Rao diversity of the bud bank index were significantly related to Solidago cover. Including the invasives’ traits revealed that their trait values influenced community indices significantly. Asclepias and Solidago cover were negatively correlated, but did not alter each other’s effects.

Conclusions

Solidago has a stronger negative impact on resident species richness than Asclepias, which appears neutral. Trait-based mechanisms of reduced richness under Solidago dominance needs further study. The lack of interaction between these invaders suggests their individual impacts dominate over potential synergies or antagonisms. DOI https://doi.org/10.32942/X2VH0J Subjects Biodiversity, Botany, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology

Keywords

biological invasions, dry grasslands, multi-species invasion, co-invasion, assembly rules, community diversity, Solidago, Asclepias Dates Published: 2024-10-27 13:57 Last Updated: 2025-09-24 04:10 Older Versions License CC-By Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Additional Metadata Conflict of interest statement: No conflict of interest. Data and Code Availability Statement: Data will be available upon acceptance for publication in a journal. Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-05T02:00:03.366016+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0