A Comparative Evaluation of Social Network Analysis Tools: Performance and Community Engagement Perspectives

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract Graphs are increasingly used in research, industry, and government. This has led to a wide range of analytical and graph-processing tools. There are various tools and platforms for graph processing. Many network based platforms, tools and storage systems have been presented over time. Each system evaluates its effectiveness and usability in processing graph data using different statistics and criteria. As a result, comparing the various systems' performances becomes challenging. This study benchamark popular network analysis tools— NetworkX, RustworkX, Igraph, EasyGraph, and Graph-tool— by evaluating their performance and extracted community engagement metrics, such as the number of downloads, stars, and forks. We benchmark the library's performance on three open-source datasets, one custom dataset, and twelve network analysis methods. The findings reveal that while NetworkX is highly popular, it exhibits slower performance in most benchmarks compared to Graph-tool and Igraph, which are faster and more efficient despite their lower popularity. The continued popularity of NetworkX may be attributed to factors like well-documented methods and a user-friendly API, though this warrants further investigation. This research provides valuable insights for practitioners, researchers, and developers, helping them make informed decisions when selecting network analysis tools. The study emphasizes the trade-off between user-friendliness and performance, suggesting that the optimal tool choice depends on project-specific requirements.
Full text 13,302 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
A Comparative Evaluation of Social Network Analysis Tools: Performance and Community Engagement Perspectives | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article A Comparative Evaluation of Social Network Analysis Tools: Performance and Community Engagement Perspectives Ridwan Amure, Nitin Agarwal This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4790818/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 05 Mar, 2025 Read the published version in Social Network Analysis and Mining → Version 1 posted 11 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Graphs are increasingly used in research, industry, and government. This has led to a wide range of analytical and graph-processing tools. There are various tools and platforms for graph processing. Many network based platforms, tools and storage systems have been presented over time. Each system evaluates its effectiveness and usability in processing graph data using different statistics and criteria. As a result, comparing the various systems' performances becomes challenging. This study benchamark popular network analysis tools— NetworkX, RustworkX, Igraph, EasyGraph, and Graph-tool— by evaluating their performance and extracted community engagement metrics, such as the number of downloads, stars, and forks. We benchmark the library's performance on three open-source datasets, one custom dataset, and twelve network analysis methods. The findings reveal that while NetworkX is highly popular, it exhibits slower performance in most benchmarks compared to Graph-tool and Igraph, which are faster and more efficient despite their lower popularity. The continued popularity of NetworkX may be attributed to factors like well-documented methods and a user-friendly API, though this warrants further investigation. This research provides valuable insights for practitioners, researchers, and developers, helping them make informed decisions when selecting network analysis tools. The study emphasizes the trade-off between user-friendliness and performance, suggesting that the optimal tool choice depends on project-specific requirements. NetworkX Igraph EasyGraph Rustworkx Graph-tool Social Network Analysis Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 05 Mar, 2025 Read the published version in Social Network Analysis and Mining → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revision requested 15 Nov, 2024 Reviews received at journal 11 Nov, 2024 Reviews received at journal 25 Oct, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 07 Oct, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 06 Oct, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 05 Oct, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 04 Oct, 2024 Reviewers invited by journal 13 Sep, 2024 Editor assigned by journal 09 Aug, 2024 Submission checks completed at journal 24 Jul, 2024 First submitted to journal 23 Jul, 2024 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-4790818","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":341404800,"identity":"9378d476-37a1-4726-be22-dc188178f375","order_by":0,"name":"Ridwan Amure","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"COSMOS Research Center, UA Little Rock","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ridwan","middleName":"","lastName":"Amure","suffix":""},{"id":341404801,"identity":"35295aea-6cf0-4f42-84f0-6a99da1d3445","order_by":1,"name":"Nitin Agarwal","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"COSMOS Research Center, UA Little Rock","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Nitin","middleName":"","lastName":"Agarwal","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-07-23 18:53:11","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4790818/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4790818/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-025-01409-y","type":"published","date":"2025-03-05T15:56:51+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":78178209,"identity":"0a3061f4-a734-48e1-8d6a-a374f5a195bd","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-03-10 16:07:50","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":7013639,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"NetworkAnalysisToolsEvaluationSNAMJournal.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4790818/v1_covered_de50ab73-76c6-4759-bd99-dd5c41c5a069.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"A Comparative Evaluation of Social Network Analysis Tools: Performance and Community Engagement Perspectives","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"social-network-analysis-and-mining","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"snam","sideBox":"Learn more about [Social Network Analysis and Mining](http://link.springer.com/journal/13278)","snPcode":"13278","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/13278/3","title":"Social Network Analysis and Mining","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"NetworkX, Igraph, EasyGraph, Rustworkx, Graph-tool, Social Network Analysis","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4790818/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4790818/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\nGraphs are increasingly used in research, industry, and government. This has led to a wide range of analytical and graph-processing tools. There are various tools and platforms for graph processing. Many network based platforms, tools and storage systems have been presented over time. Each system evaluates its effectiveness and usability in processing graph data using different statistics and criteria. As a result, comparing the various systems' performances becomes challenging. This study benchamark popular network analysis tools— NetworkX, RustworkX, Igraph, EasyGraph, and Graph-tool— by evaluating their performance and extracted community engagement metrics, such as the number of downloads, stars, and forks. We benchmark the library's performance on three open-source datasets, one custom dataset, and twelve network analysis methods. The findings reveal that while NetworkX is highly popular, it exhibits slower performance in most benchmarks compared to Graph-tool and Igraph, which are faster and more efficient despite their lower popularity. The continued popularity of NetworkX may be attributed to factors like well-documented methods and a user-friendly API, though this warrants further investigation. This research provides valuable insights for practitioners, researchers, and developers, helping them make informed decisions when selecting network analysis tools. The study emphasizes the trade-off between user-friendliness and performance, suggesting that the optimal tool choice depends on project-specific requirements.","manuscriptTitle":"A Comparative Evaluation of Social Network Analysis Tools: Performance and Community Engagement Perspectives","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-08-20 18:19:03","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4790818/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2024-11-16T03:59:50+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2024-11-11T21:09:20+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2024-10-25T04:08:33+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"77242194134834641532511303919470011154","date":"2024-10-07T09:12:24+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"19859487296452795332132797589209332597","date":"2024-10-07T01:03:24+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"50479170690263194756784732454232837855","date":"2024-10-05T10:15:11+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"214529974334233850146308225001315426477","date":"2024-10-05T01:31:20+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2024-09-13T09:09:56+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2024-08-09T08:25:21+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2024-07-24T12:16:19+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Social Network Analysis and Mining","date":"2024-07-23T18:51:05+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"social-network-analysis-and-mining","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"snam","sideBox":"Learn more about [Social Network Analysis and Mining](http://link.springer.com/journal/13278)","snPcode":"13278","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/13278/3","title":"Social Network Analysis and Mining","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"fd2e8a72-78b7-4c82-99d3-a7d53cd8e131","owner":[],"postedDate":"August 20th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-03-10T15:59:04+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-4790818","link":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-025-01409-y","journal":{"identity":"social-network-analysis-and-mining","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Social Network Analysis and Mining"},"publishedOn":"2025-03-05 15:56:51","publishedOnDateReadable":"March 5th, 2025"},"versionCreatedAt":"2024-08-20 18:19:03","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1007/s13278-025-01409-y","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-025-01409-y","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-4790818","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-4790818","identity":"rs-4790818","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-04T02:00:05.705006+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0