Illustrating the Assumptions of Meta-Regression in Treatment Networks

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-03 · read from full text

This preprint studies frequentist network meta-regression (NMR) methods, focusing on how different modeling assumptions and data directionality choices affect treatment-by-covariate interactions and results in treatment networks. The authors evaluate four NMR modeling assumptions implemented via design-matrix modifications to a standard network meta-analysis model, illustrating their behavior using a network of ten diabetes treatments, and they provide recommendations alongside guidance on interpretation. They find that, in models without enforced consistency, data directionality can substantially influence results, and they show that differences across assumptions emphasize the need to consider both network structure and study characteristics. A major limitation noted by the paper is that choosing among NMR model assumptions is complex and results can vary with model fit and data availability, particularly in sparse-data settings. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Background Network meta-analysis (NMA) is a common statistical method used to synthesize evidence across multiple studies, enabling simultaneous comparison of multiple competing treatments for a given condition. Network meta-regression (NMR) extends NMA by adjusting treatment effect estimates based on study-level characteristics, helping to explain residual heterogeneity. Despite its usefulness, NMR adoption as a technique has been limited due to conceptual complexity, implementation challenges, and limitations in sparse-data settings. NMR model coefficients follow independent, exchangeable, or common assumptions, each applied with or without enforcing consistency among treatment comparisons. However, choosing between these models is complex, as different modeling assumptions can lead to varying results and interpretations depending on factors like model fit and data availability. Additionally, before fitting NMR models without consistency, meta-analysts must also consider potential data directionality, where certain study characteristics (e.g., sponsorship) may systematically bias treatment effect estimates. Methods We present frequentist tools for NMR and evaluate the properties of four different modelling assumptions achievable via design matrix modifications to the standard NMA model. Based on these properties, we provide recommendations for NMR implementation that account for data availability and the research question of interest. We also offer guidance on interpreting treatment-by-covariate interactions in the context of underlying NMR assumptions. Results We illustrate the different NMR modeling assumptions using a network of ten diabetes treatments. Findings highlight the impact of data directionality in models without consistency in the treatment-by-covariate interactions. Differences across modeling assumptions underscore the importance of carefully considering both the network structure and the characteristics of included studies when implementing NMR. Conclusion This work elucidates crucial NMR assumptions and demonstrates the importance of the network structure for NMR. The introduced tools can streamline the implementation of NMR, facilitating the exploration of sources of heterogeneity and inconsistency in NMA and expanding tools available to researchers in the field of evidence synthesis.
Full text 16,847 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Illustrating the Assumptions of Meta-Regression in Treatment Networks | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Illustrating the Assumptions of Meta-Regression in Treatment Networks Nana-adjoa Kwarteng, Theodoros Evrenoglou, Julia Mueller, Moritz Elsaesser, and 3 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8235913/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Review Version 1 posted 8 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background Network meta-analysis (NMA) is a common statistical method used to synthesize evidence across multiple studies, enabling simultaneous comparison of multiple competing treatments for a given condition. Network meta-regression (NMR) extends NMA by adjusting treatment effect estimates based on study-level characteristics, helping to explain residual heterogeneity. Despite its usefulness, NMR adoption as a technique has been limited due to conceptual complexity, implementation challenges, and limitations in sparse-data settings. NMR model coefficients follow independent, exchangeable, or common assumptions, each applied with or without enforcing consistency among treatment comparisons. However, choosing between these models is complex, as different modeling assumptions can lead to varying results and interpretations depending on factors like model fit and data availability. Additionally, before fitting NMR models without consistency, meta-analysts must also consider potential data directionality, where certain study characteristics (e.g., sponsorship) may systematically bias treatment effect estimates. Methods We present frequentist tools for NMR and evaluate the properties of four different modelling assumptions achievable via design matrix modifications to the standard NMA model. Based on these properties, we provide recommendations for NMR implementation that account for data availability and the research question of interest. We also offer guidance on interpreting treatment-by-covariate interactions in the context of underlying NMR assumptions. Results We illustrate the different NMR modeling assumptions using a network of ten diabetes treatments. Findings highlight the impact of data directionality in models without consistency in the treatment-by-covariate interactions. Differences across modeling assumptions underscore the importance of carefully considering both the network structure and the characteristics of included studies when implementing NMR. Conclusion This work elucidates crucial NMR assumptions and demonstrates the importance of the network structure for NMR. The introduced tools can streamline the implementation of NMR, facilitating the exploration of sources of heterogeneity and inconsistency in NMA and expanding tools available to researchers in the field of evidence synthesis. network meta-analysis network meta-regression small data directionality consistency assumption Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Supplementary Files SupplementTablesIllustratingAssumptionsMetaRegressionTreatmentNetworks10.xlsx SupplementIllustratingAssumptionsMetaRegressionTreatmentNetworks10.docx Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Review Version 1 posted Reviews received at journal 14 Jan, 2026 Reviewers agreed at journal 05 Jan, 2026 Reviewers agreed at journal 30 Dec, 2025 Reviewers invited by journal 23 Dec, 2025 Editor invited by journal 02 Dec, 2025 Editor assigned by journal 30 Nov, 2025 Submission checks completed at journal 30 Nov, 2025 First submitted to journal 29 Nov, 2025 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-8235913","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":576534664,"identity":"518bbf09-928c-45d5-996c-ff9c8c9ec5a0","order_by":0,"name":"Nana-adjoa Kwarteng","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University Medical Center Freiburg","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Nana-adjoa","middleName":"","lastName":"Kwarteng","suffix":""},{"id":576534666,"identity":"edfb1b42-1232-4593-bc3b-7c594332deb8","order_by":1,"name":"Theodoros Evrenoglou","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University Medical Center Freiburg","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Theodoros","middleName":"","lastName":"Evrenoglou","suffix":""},{"id":576534667,"identity":"6451ded0-268f-492b-8266-9e4bd0a0734b","order_by":2,"name":"Julia Mueller","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University Medical Center Freiburg","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Julia","middleName":"","lastName":"Mueller","suffix":""},{"id":576534668,"identity":"cb963246-4bc8-46b2-b53e-ddc4d6166b77","order_by":3,"name":"Moritz Elsaesser","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University Medical Center Freiburg","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Moritz","middleName":"","lastName":"Elsaesser","suffix":""},{"id":576534669,"identity":"aeeaa52d-da62-49d0-bdc8-af619570966f","order_by":4,"name":"Elisabeth Schramm","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University Medical Center Freiburg","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Elisabeth","middleName":"","lastName":"Schramm","suffix":""},{"id":576534670,"identity":"01fe4045-9563-4e9b-b67c-4a0297aadac1","order_by":5,"name":"Guido Schwarzer","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University Medical Center Freiburg","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Guido","middleName":"","lastName":"Schwarzer","suffix":""},{"id":576534671,"identity":"012427f4-b3dd-47e3-8156-f2484d4c0616","order_by":6,"name":"Adriani Nikolakopoulou","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Aristotle University of Thessaloniki","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Adriani","middleName":"","lastName":"Nikolakopoulou","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-11-29 09:23:28","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8235913/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8235913/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":103509563,"identity":"24d0d8ec-c6d8-419a-ab73-e599af06c691","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-26 13:59:46","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1122357,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"ManuscriptIllustratingAssumptionsMetaRegressionTreatmentNetworks10.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8235913/v1_covered_ab9fd108-d80c-477d-a92b-7866f719d40e.pdf"},{"id":103330939,"identity":"4414662e-9dcc-401a-bd3a-b99eb824110c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-24 13:44:24","extension":"xlsx","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":81047,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"SupplementTablesIllustratingAssumptionsMetaRegressionTreatmentNetworks10.xlsx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8235913/v1/5cecfeb23949e7e358da986f.xlsx"},{"id":103506329,"identity":"66bd60eb-2814-46a2-a061-db2ea1bd56d3","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-26 13:35:21","extension":"docx","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":928424,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"SupplementIllustratingAssumptionsMetaRegressionTreatmentNetworks10.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8235913/v1/1b5d30158d76119aba7e90d3.docx"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Illustrating the Assumptions of Meta-Regression in Treatment Networks","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":true,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"bmc-medical-research-methodology","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"bmrm","sideBox":"Learn more about [BMC Medical Research Methodology](http://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/bmrm/default.aspx","title":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","twitterHandle":"BMC_series","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"network meta-analysis, network meta-regression, small data, directionality, consistency assumption","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8235913/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8235913/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBackground\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNetwork meta-analysis (NMA) is a common statistical method used to synthesize evidence across multiple studies, enabling simultaneous comparison of multiple competing treatments for a given condition. Network meta-regression (NMR) extends NMA by adjusting treatment effect estimates based on study-level characteristics, helping to explain residual heterogeneity. Despite its usefulness, NMR adoption as a technique has been limited due to conceptual complexity, implementation challenges, and limitations in sparse-data settings. NMR model coefficients follow independent, exchangeable, or common assumptions, each applied with or without enforcing consistency among treatment comparisons. However, choosing between these models is complex, as different modeling assumptions can lead to varying results and interpretations depending on factors like model fit and data availability. Additionally, before fitting NMR models without consistency, meta-analysts must also consider potential data directionality, where certain study characteristics (e.g., sponsorship) may systematically bias treatment effect estimates.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMethods\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe present frequentist tools for NMR and evaluate the properties of four different modelling assumptions achievable via design matrix modifications to the standard NMA model. Based on these properties, we provide recommendations for NMR implementation that account for data availability and the research question of interest. We also offer guidance on interpreting treatment-by-covariate interactions in the context of underlying NMR assumptions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eResults\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe illustrate the different NMR modeling assumptions using a network of ten diabetes treatments. Findings highlight the impact of data directionality in models without consistency in the treatment-by-covariate interactions. Differences across modeling assumptions underscore the importance of carefully considering both the network structure and the characteristics of included studies when implementing NMR.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConclusion\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis work elucidates crucial NMR assumptions and demonstrates the importance of the network structure for NMR. The introduced tools can streamline the implementation of NMR, facilitating the exploration of sources of heterogeneity and inconsistency in NMA and expanding tools available to researchers in the field of evidence synthesis.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Illustrating the Assumptions of Meta-Regression in Treatment Networks","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-02-24 13:44:19","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8235913/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2026-01-14T15:26:21+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"172144901053553297086677829647146076190","date":"2026-01-05T08:30:46+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"219758406383374190991835750110771272983","date":"2025-12-30T21:48:47+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2025-12-23T18:50:46+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2025-12-02T11:50:15+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2025-12-01T02:13:27+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2025-12-01T02:12:02+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","date":"2025-11-29T09:13:51+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"bmc-medical-research-methodology","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"bmrm","sideBox":"Learn more about [BMC Medical Research Methodology](http://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/bmrm/default.aspx","title":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","twitterHandle":"BMC_series","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"6b4bb9ab-7eb1-42a1-a07e-34a082ab9718","owner":[],"postedDate":"February 24th, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"under-review","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-02-24T13:44:19+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-02-24 13:44:19","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-8235913","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-8235913","identity":"rs-8235913","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-04T02:00:05.705006+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0