Studies on diffusion of moisture through nanoclay/vinylester/glass nanocomposites

Studies on diffusion of moisture through nanoclay/vinylester/glass nanocomposites | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Studies on diffusion of moisture through nanoclay/vinylester/glass nanocomposites Bommanna Kamanna, B S Anupama, Prashant S Hatti This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3870050/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract The goal of this study was to see how mud content affected nanoclay/vinylester/glass composites submerged in 13.5 pH soluble solutions for up to 100 days. The corruptions in UTS, Impact characteristics, Flexural Strength and Interlaminar Shear Strength were investigated, as well as the samples' diffusivity. Vinylester/glass composites, have the highest dampness retention of 0.85 percent, while 8wt percent nanoclay/vinylester/glass nanocomposites have the lowest dampness retention of 0.55 percent. The diffusion co-efficient was determined to be 9.53X10 − 13 m 2 /sec for nanoclay/vinyl ester/glass composites with 8wt percent and 2.98X10 − 13 m 2 /sec for nanoclay/vinyl ester/glass composites with 8wt percent.Mechanical characteristics dropped at a faster rate as a result of moisture retention. In comparison to vinylester/glass composites, 4wt% nanoclay/vinylester/glass composites displayed improved performance in salt environment moulding of all composite classes. XRD was used to concentrate scattering, and Scanning Electron Microscopy was used to focus on the ductile cracked samples. Montmorillonite nanoclay Mechanical Fire retardancy Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 1. Introduction The growing use of FRP composites necessitates lifetimes of 15, 25, and 50 years. In any event, the lack of long-term solidity and execution data has been a disincentive to the widespread use of composites. [ 1 ]. The mechanical properties of polymers and their composites are intrinsically time-subordinate, which is a disadvantage. Because of the viscoelastic concept of polymers, this implies that strength and solidity are time-dependent. Miniature underlying and compositional modifications, time-subordinate disfigurement and resulting harm gathering, natural attack, and the synergistic effects among these are some of the reasons for a polymer's degraded cohesiveness and solidity. Sander reported that debasement in mechanical characteristics, as well as polymer breaking and chipping, revealed a high pH climate [ 2 ].Framework tiny breaks are the most common type of damage in covered composite. These minor cracks degrade the characteristics of FRP composites and can serve as a precursor to other types of damage, resulting in disappointment. [ 3 ].Ellyin and Maser investigated the effects of dampness retention and exposure to a high pH environment on the mechanical properties of glass fibre supported polymer (GFRP) tubes, finding water damage at the Glass fibre interphase as water temperature increased [ 4 ].Diffused water in the composites ends up in the network or at the interphase district. Water acts as a plasticizer in the network, expanding free volume, lowering glass progress temperature, and reducing the internal pressure that develops during composite handling. [ 5 ].Plasticization, expanding pressure, hydrolysis, and the formation of fractures are examples of natural opening events that could affect water dispersion in composites [ 6 , 7 ]. Dampness Wicking along the fiber–network interface weakens the interfacial link, resulting in a loss of underlying uprightness [ 8 ]. Polymer nanocomposites are a type of material that is new. They are better than traditional materials because they have stronger mechanical, thermal, and barrier properties. Nanocomposites have become better because of the tiny particles they use. These particles are very strong and have a unique shape that helps improve the nanocomposites. Materials that are very tiny have very good strength and abilities to handle pressure. Scientists have been working hard to change the way things are made really, really small. The amount, size, and shape of fillers added to a composite and how they mix with the material it's made of affects the composite's characteristics. We know that if we add tiny particles called nanoclays to a certain material, it will make the material much stiffer. Organo clay can withstand high heat and make things harder to melt or deform. So far, scientists have mostly been working with adding layered Silicate to plastic to make polymer nanocomposites. We don't know much about continuous fiber reinforced polymer nanocomposites. Making these strong materials isn't easy and it can be expensive. These are good for things that need to be both light and strong, especially if they might get hit really hard when being used at high temperatures. In light of the prior discussion, it was decided that more attention should be paid to the natural effects of nano phased vinylesters and their fiber-supported composites. It is envisaged that the overall appearance of FRP composites will improve, and that their use will be extended without any concern about sturdiness. Furthermore, if a plan life of 15–50 years is required for composites applications, it is unlikely that tests on materials or constructions will be conducted for long enough to span the plan lifetime. As a result, there is a strong need for accelerated lifespan portrayal philosophies to ensure the honesty and safety of major characters. Thegoal of this research is to combine advances in nanoclay application with accelerated maturation studies to focus on long-term sturdiness. The purpose of this review is to better understand the long-term behavior of nanoclay GFRP composites, as well as the differences in long-term properties of polymers with and without nanoclay expansion. The study presented here is critical for achieving the overall goal of increasing the strength of fiber-supported composites using nanoclay. 2. Experimental 2.1 Materials Ecmas Hyderabad provided the network gum used in this study, ECMALON 9911 Bisphenol epoxy-based vinyl ester pitch. Cobalt naphthenate, methyl ethyl ketone peroxide, di-Methyl acetamide were used as restorative agents. Montmorillonite K-10 (MMT) nanoclays were used, which were given by Sigma-Aldrich. Vetrotex, India, supplied 200gsm glass strands with an emulsion-based estimation specialist and a plain-woven texture type. 2.2 Nanocomposites preparation The nanocomposites were created in two stages: nanoclay/vinylester gel coat ultrasonic planning and gel coat/glass overlays development. For two hours, ultrasonication was employed to scatter nanoclays ranging from 0 to 8 wt% (27 kHz). To start the cross-connecting process, 2 wt% each of Di-Methyl acetamide, Cobalt napthalate, and methyl ethyl ketone peroxide (MEKP) were pre-blended in mud/vinyl ester at room temperature as advertiser, gas pedal, and impetus. A manual lay-up procedure with a glass supported gel finish was used to create the nanocomposite coatings. The fibre-to-tar ratio was kept constant at 65:35, and the samples were left to rest at room temperature for 24 hours. 2.3 Alkali immersion The soluble base openness is especially significant for marine grade polymer composites since it is an irreversible cycle. In a similar fashion to accelerated maturation, the moisture that the composite maintains will deteriorate the composite's properties. The salt arrangement was made with 1.4 percent KOH, 1% NaOH, 0.16 percent Ca (OH) 2 , and purified water. The pH of the solution was determined to be 13.5 using a pH meter. To assess the impact of nanoclay on FRP nanocomposites while inundated in a high pH antacid solution, one set of experiments was immersed in room temperature salt solution. 2.3 Characterization 2.3.1 Mechanical Properties According to ASTM D 790, the examples were tested for flexural characteristics. Flexural testing was carried out using samples 80838mm in a 3-Point Bending setup. The pliable sample 208 12.7 3 mm with a check length of 90 mm were tested in accordance with ASTM-D 3039 using a 5 mm/min cross head speed. The greater shear pressure existent between any two layers of an overlay material, measured in N/mm2, is referred to as Entomb Laminar Shear Strength (ILSS). ILSS testing was performed using 45mm X 6mm X 3mm examples in a 3-Point Bending configuration according to ASTM 2344. Kalpak Industry, Pune, India, delivered a 10-ton limit PC controlled greater precision Universal Testing Machine for the malleable, flexural, and ILSS tests. Low-speed sway tests were performed on un-scored instances 6412.73 mm at 111.4 mm/s using an instrumented sway analyzer furnished by M/s IN Equip Ltd., Mumbai, in accordance with ASTM D-256. The Izod test examples were clasped in an upright posture such that the example's finish faced its striking edge and the effect energy absorbed for breaking the example could be easily measured. 2.3.2 Effect of Nanoclay on Mechanical Properties Mechanical properties such as Ultimate tensile strength(UTS), Flexural strength (FS), Inter laminar shear strength (ILSS) and Vickers’s Hardness (VHN) of the nanocomposites were characterized. UTS increased by 39% in glass/Vinyl ester/nanoclay composites for 3 wt % loading of nanoclay when compared with glass/epoxy composites. For the same loading level of nanoclay, there was 15% increase in UTS in Vinyl ester /nanoclay composites when compared with epoxy neat casting. The increase in 5 wt % nanoclay dispersed composites did not show any noticeable improvement and the same decreased in case of 8 wt% samples. The Flexural strength of 3wt% nanoclay samples showed 10.6% in glass/ Vinyl ester /nanoclay composites when compared with glass/ Vinyl ester. For the same loading of nanoclay, there was 20% increase of flexural strength in Vinyl ester /nanoclay composites when compared with neat casting. The 5 and 8 wt % nanoclay composites were not of any significance. The ILSS of 3 wt% and 5 wt% of nanoclay samples showed an increment of 40% and 31% respectively for glass/ Vinyl ester /nanoclay samples compared with glass/ Vinyl ester composites. The Vickers hardness of the samples for 3 wt% of nanoclay showed an increment of 26% for glass/ Vinyl ester /nanoclay compared with Vinyl ester /glass. The same improvement was 39% in Vinyl ester /nanoclay when compared with neat casting. The 5 wt% of nanoclay dispersed specimens showed an increment of 10% in glass/ Vinyl ester /nanoclay when compared with Vinyl ester /glass. Vinyl ester /nanoclay samples showed 30% increase in hardness when compared with Vinyl ester /nanoclay. Whereas the 8 wt% of nanoclay dispersed specimens of nanoclay/ Vinyl ester /glass showed drop in hardness. The improvements in mechanical properties of 3 wt% of nanoclay are due to the improved interfacial bonding between fibers and matrix modified by the nanoclay. The large holes in the nanocomposite samples were the main cause of the deterioration of the mechanical properties of the 5 wt% and 8 wt% samples. The large holes were created during the mixing process of the hardener, clay and resin combination. The reason was that the mixture became too viscous and slow even with increasing nanoclay loading. Adding more nanoclay increased the viscosity of the clay-resin mixture. As the hardener was injected and mixed, large air bubbles formed easily and were contained within the slow-moving mixture. The finished product will blister as it cures. These two percentages indicated less improvement in mechanical properties when later tested in UTM, possibly because the internal bubbles could not withstand the force and caused cracks to propagate through the sample. 2.3.3 Effect of Flammability test Horizontal Burning rate tests The flammability property of the samples improves constantly with the increase of nanoclay wt%. The HBR tests results with different wt% of nanoclay samples are tabulated in Table 2. 1. The 8wt% nanoclay samples showed a decrement in burning rate of about 56% and 47% for glass/ Vinyl ester /nanoclay and Vinyl ester /nanoclay samples respectively. The 5 wt% nanoclay samples showed a decrease in burning rate of about 40% and 33% for glass/ Vinyl ester /nanoclay and Vinyl ester /nanoclay samples respectively. The 3 wt% nanoclay samples showed a decrement in burning rate of about 27% and 16% for glass/ Vinyl ester /nanoclay and Vinyl ester /nanoclay samples respectively. It is seen that 8 wt% nanoclay samples showed less burning rate than 5 and 3 wt% nanoclay samples. Hence nanoclay acts like a flame retardant. Table 2.1 Horizontal burning rates Epoxy/glass/nanoclay and Epoxy/nanoclay Wt % of Nanoclay HBR (mm/min) HBR (mm/min) 0 117.18 31.1 3 85.22 26.0 5 70.09 20.8 8 51.51 16.4 Vertical Burning rate tests The VBR tests results are tabulated in Table 2.2 . Among the different wt% of nanoclay samples the 8 wt% nanoclay samples showed a maximum decrement in burning rate of about 46.81% and 14% for glass/ Vinyl ester /nanoclay and Vinyl ester /nanoclay samples respectively. The 5 wt% nanoclay samples showed a decrement in burning rate of about 31.51% and 6% for glass/ Vinyl ester /nanoclay and Vinyl ester /nanoclay samples respectively. The 3 wt% nanoclay samples showed a decrement in burning rate of 20% and 3.1% for glass/ Vinyl ester /nanoclay and Vinyl ester /nanoclay samples respectively. It is seen that 8 wt% nanoclay samples showed less burning rate than 5 and 3 wt% nanoclay samples. Hence nanoclay acts like a flame retardant. Table 2.2 Vertical burning rates Epoxy/glass/nanoclay and Epoxy/nanoclay Wt% of Nanoclay VBR (mm/min) VBR (mm/min) 0 77.3 75 3 75 60 5 73 51.37 8 66.9 39.89 2.3.4 Fire Retardancy of nanocomposites As a heat barrier that prevents heat from entering unpyrolyzed material and, more importantly, as the surface temperature rises, increases the surface re-radiation heat losses, the formation of a surface layer during the pyrolysis of nanocomposites was traditionally thought to be the primary factor in improved fire retardancy. The polymeric materials were investigated for the mechanical properties and fire retardancy. The mechanical test studies showed increase in the mechanical properties at 3 wt% of nanoclay for the glass/ Vinyl ester /nanoclay and Vinyl ester /nanoclay samples. This is due to the improved interfacial bonding between the fibers and the surrounding mattrix. Adding nanoclay into the samples reduced the flammability and hence nanoclay acts as a good flame retardant. Since this layer acts as a heat barrier to stop heat from transferring into unpyrolyzed material and more importantly increases the surface re-radiation heat losses as the surface temperature increases, the formation of a barrier surface between the neighbouring layers during pyrolysis of nanocomposites was traditionally thought to be the primary factor in improved fire retardancy. Therefore, it can be concluded that in order to achieve outstanding mechanical qualities, the nanoclay content should be maintained at 3 wt%. Nanoclay/epoxy/glass composites were fabricated and tested for mechanical properties and fire retardancy. Based on the experimental results the following conclusions were arrived at: The mechnaical properties of nanoclay/epoxy/glass and nanoclay/epoxy compsoites showed greatest improvemnts at 3 wt % of nanoclay dispersion. The fire retarancy in the nanoclay dispersed composites improved with nanoclay addition and the improvement was monotonic with the loading levels of nanoclay in the testing range.Scanning electron microscopy revealed good dispersion at 3 wt % of nanoclay whereas at higher percentages the nanoclay agglomerates were observed. 3. Results and discussion 3.1 Alkali exposure The wetness retention (M) of the two composites shown in the Table 3.1 is the highest (1). Vinylester/glass composites were determined to have the most wetness ingestion. The Nanoclay/Vinylester/glass composites with an 8wt% Nanoclay/Vinylester/glass content had the lowest wetness retention. Because of the hydrophobic nature of Nanoclay in vinylester, which repels water particles and prevents water entry into the composite, there is less antacid ingestion if there is an occurrence of 8wt percent Nanoclay/Vinylester/glass. If an occurrence of 100 days occurs, the lattice corruption is increased due to more moisture intake in the event of a lengthy length. This is because fundamental climatic maturation of polymers can produce damage through enraging, small breaking, and other morphological modifications, allowing for more dampness ingestion. Table 3.1 Maximum Moisture absorption, maximum moisture uptake (alkali solution) slope and diffusion co-efficient Weight percentage of nanoclay Maximum moisture absorption Maximum moisture uptake % slope of the absorption curve Diffusion coefficient mm 2 /s 0% 0.853 6.558 0.132 9.53X10 − 7 2% 0.759 5.289 0.10 5.45X10 − 7 4% 0.691 4.936 0.091 4.51X10 − 7 6% 0.63 4.18 0.074 2.98X10 − 7 8% 0.55 3.28 0.064 2.98X10 − 7 The effect of Alkali exposure for Vinylester/glass and different weight percent Nanoclay/Vinylester/glass composites shown in Fig. 3.1 . 3.2. UTS, Flexural Strength, ILSS and impact degradations Figure 3.2 shows the response of the composite frameworks to salt conditions as a function of rigidity as a component of length of openness (2). The examples after soluble base openness indicate significant development in debasement with openness schedule expansion. The UTS rate for vinylester/glass composites is decreasing. The temperature was kept at room temperature throughout the first 100 hours of openness. Among the five composites studied, 4 percent nanoclay/vinylester/glass composites perform the best, while vinylester/glass composites perform worst. The filtering electron micrographs provide strong evidence of the limiting between the pitch and the fibre prior to the openness, as well as the openness afterward. The corruption in the fibre network interfacial holding has resulted in a decline in mechanical characteristics of examples due to the openness to salt climate. The main reason for dampness dissemination is the voids that exist in the network. The captured water might be stored in the small breaks framed during composite ready or by the aid condition. SEM images can be used to track the voids and micro breaks in the samples. Following 100 hours of exposure, the broken instances showed fibre break as well as fibre pull out. Following 100 hours of exposure, the Vinylestetr/glass composites demonstrated a higher level of framework plasticization than the Nanoclay/Vinylester/glass composites. As a result, in each case, framework corruption increased as the term of openness increased. If there is an occurrence of Vinylestetr/glass composites, the lattice corruption is greater because more moisture retention occurs in this case. This is because high pH alkalinity can cause damage by causing enraging, tiny breaking, and other morphological abnormalities, allowing for additional moisture consumption. However, when the drenching period increased, the fibre surfaces of the samples submerged in the alkyl arrangement showed reduced passion. Because of the powerless fiber-lattice holding, the fibre surface appears to be rather immaculate. The disappointment mode was visible in SEM images of elastic broken unexposed Vinylestetr/glass and Nanoclay/Vinylestetr/glass samples due to fibre breaking. Many passions may be seen on the fiber's outer layer, where the framework has clung to the fibre long after it has broken. This demonstrates that before corruption, there is a strong link between the fibre and the grid. Alkali retention is expected to the nanoclay in vinylester if 8wt percent nanoclay/vinylester/glass is used, due to the hydrophobic nature of the earth, which builds the boundary layer to allow water particles to enter the composite and prevents water infiltration. The rate of mechanical property loss is due to moisture ingestion, which causes composites to expand as well as delamination between fibre and grid. The salty environment induces GFRP embrittlement and capillary micro breaks, resulting in a significant loss in longitudinal and cross-sectional mechanical characteristics. In the UTS, FS, ILSS, and Impact instances, 4wt percent nanoclay/vinylester/glass outperformed vinylester/glass in terms of lesser corruption upsides. SEM images of a pliable, unexposed pliable example. The disappointment mode was demonstrated in many nanoclay/vinylester/glass cases due to fibre breakage. The framework clung to the fibre even after it was broken, as evidenced by the several tempers visible on the outer layer of the fibre. This demonstrates that before corruption, there is a strong link between the fibre and the network. For the specimens soaked in the alkyl arrangement, however, as the drenching duration increased, less temper was visible on the fibre surfaces. The powerless fiber-grid holding is responsible for the rather flawless fibre surface. When compared to vinylester/glass composites, nanoclay/vinylester/glass composites with 4wt% nanoclay/vinylester/glass composites showed improved performance in antacid climate moulding. Declarations Ethical Approval: This Declaration is “not applicable”. Funding : This Declaration is “not applicable”. Availability of data and materials: All the data we mentioned in this paper are part of our study and self generated. Conflict of interest statement The authors declare the following conflict of competing interests: The authors of this manuscript have directly participated in the planning, execution, or analysis of this study. The authors of the paper have read and approved the final version submitted. We declare that the paper is original, has not been submitted for publication in other journals and has not already been published. References Ray SS, Okamoto M (2018) Polymer/layered silicate nanocomposites: a review from preparation to processing. Prog Polym Sci 28:1539–1641 Schmidt D, Shah D, Giannelis EP (2019) New Advances in Polymer/Layered Silicate Nanocomposites. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 6(3):205–212 Bhat G, Hegde1 RR, Kamath MG, Deshpande B(2018),Nanoclay Reinforced Fibers and Nonwovens. J Eng Fibers Fabr, 3(3), 22–34 Alexandre M, Dubois P (2017) Polymer-layered silicate nanocomposites: preparation, properties and uses of a new class of materials. Mater Sci Eng 28:1–63 Almagableh PR, Mantena A, Alostaz W, Liu LT, Drzal (2019) eXPRESS Polym Lett Vol 3:724–732 Diparay,Suparnasengupta SPS (2016) Preparation and properties of vinyl este resin/clay Nanocomposites. Macromol Mater Eng 291:1513–1520 Arun KSubramain CT, Sun (2017) The use of nanoclay plates to enhance compressive strength of fiber reinforced composites,18th American society of compositesconference Haque A, Hossain F, D, M.Shamsuzzoha (2018) S2-glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Nanocomposites: Manufacturing,Structures, Thermal and Mechanical Properties. J ofComposite Mater 276:151–155 Kanny K, Moodley PJVK (2018) Mechanical and tribulogicla behaviour of clay-polypropylene nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 43:7230–7238 Zhao Z, Gou J, Bietto S, Ibeh C, Hui D (2019) Fire retardancy of clay/carbon nanofiber hybrid sheet in fiber reinforced polymer composites. Compos Sci Technol 69:2081–2087 Sreejith M, Narasimha Murthy HN, Rai KS, Krishna M, Jeena JK (2017) Hygrothermic behavior of carbon/vinylester, glass/vinylester, carbon/epoxy and glass/epoxy composites. Iran Polym J 19(2):89–103 Fabienne Samyn S, Bourbigot C, Jama, Se verine Bellayer (2018) Fire retardancy of polymer clay nanocomposites: Is there an influence of thenanomorphology. Polym Degrad Stab 93:2019–2024 In-Yup Jeon and Jong-Beom Baek (2017) Nanocomposites Derived from Polymers and Inorganic Nanoparticles, Materials, vol. 3, pp.3654–3674 Diparay,Suparna sengupta SPS (2016) Preparation and properties of vinyl este resin/clay Nanocomposites. Macromol Mater Eng 291:1513–1520 Lin L-Y, Lee Joong-H Chang- Eui Hong, Gye- Hyoung Yoo and Suresh Advani, (2016) Preparation and Characterization of Layered silicate/glass fiber/epoxy Hybrid Nanocomposites via Vacuum- assisted Resin Transfer Molding (VARTM). Compos Sci Technol, vol.66, pp. 2116–2125 Yuan Xua and Suong Van Hoa (2018) Mechanical Properties of Carbon fiber Reinforced Epoxy/clay Nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 68:854–861 Zheng Y, Zheng Y, Ning R (2017) Effects of Nanoparticles SiO2 on the Performance of Nanocomposites. Mater Lett 57:2940–2944 Lin JC, Chang LC, Nien MH, Ho HL (2016) Mechanical Behavior of Various Nanoparticle Filled Composites at Low Velocity Impact. 74:30–36Composite Structures LeBaron PC, Wang Z, Pinnavaia TJ (2018) Polymer-Layered Silicate Nanocomposites: An Overview, Applied Clay Science, vol. 15, pp. 11–29 Giannelis EP (2017) Polymer-Layered Silicate Nanocomposites: Synthesis, Properties, Applied Organomettalic Chemistry, vol. 12, pp. 675–680 Kong ZX, Wang JH (2019) Interlaminar Shear Strength of Glass Fiber Reinforced Dially Phthalate Laminates Enhanced with Nanoclays. Adv Mater Res vol.79–82 pp.1779–82 Zhong-bin Xu Wei-wei, Kong Ming-xing, Zhou maoP (2018) Effect of surface modification of Montmorillonite on the properties of rigid polyurethane foam composites. Chin J Polym Sci 28(4):615–624 Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-3870050","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":267607591,"identity":"1aa31d34-01b7-46c0-81a6-63e210fee170","order_by":0,"name":"Bommanna Kamanna","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"A P S College of Engineering","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Bommanna","middleName":"","lastName":"Kamanna","suffix":""},{"id":267607592,"identity":"023c7d89-ee27-42b2-9063-5fee8b2fb08e","order_by":1,"name":"B S Anupama","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"A P S College of Engineering","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"B","middleName":"S","lastName":"Anupama","suffix":""},{"id":267607593,"identity":"6da22dc5-5df8-4755-80e2-deef054e76ce","order_by":2,"name":"Prashant S Hatti","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"C M R Institute of Technology","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Prashant","middleName":"S","lastName":"Hatti","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-01-16 14:14:43","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3870050/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3870050/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":49868483,"identity":"f5f8441b-3b11-411d-9a8b-a1ce1149146c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-01-19 11:08:30","extension":"jpeg","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":40587,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e3.1 Alkali absorption Different wt% of Nanoclay/Vinylester/Glass Composite\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"groupimage1.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3870050/v1/239a897f3ecde37cec24181b.jpeg"},{"id":49868058,"identity":"af04faea-dc90-4439-a9e0-9a76eb8a70f8","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-01-19 11:00:30","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":321019,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e3.2 \u0026nbsp;a) Unexposedvinylester/glass b) Unexposed 4wt% MMT /vinylester/glass c) Unexposed 5 wt% MMT/ vinylester/glass, d) Vinylester/glass 200 hours, e) 4wt% MMT /vinylester/glass 200 hours, (f) ) 5 wt% MMT/ vinylester/glass 200 hours\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3870050/v1/b910a63862200ffebca68024.png"},{"id":51734780,"identity":"f25aa520-ccd2-415a-ad2d-9ce9206146c6","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-02-28 06:24:52","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":643580,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3870050/v1/08ea0a60-7e67-4519-853e-5b954b55b20f.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Studies on diffusion of moisture through nanoclay/vinylester/glass nanocomposites","fulltext":[{"header":"1. Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe growing use of FRP composites necessitates lifetimes of 15, 25, and 50 years. In any event, the lack of long-term solidity and execution data has been a disincentive to the widespread use of composites. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e]. The mechanical properties of polymers and their composites are intrinsically time-subordinate, which is a disadvantage. Because of the viscoelastic concept of polymers, this implies that strength and solidity are time-dependent. Miniature underlying and compositional modifications, time-subordinate disfigurement and resulting harm gathering, natural attack, and the synergistic effects among these are some of the reasons for a polymer's degraded cohesiveness and solidity. Sander reported that debasement in mechanical characteristics, as well as polymer breaking and chipping, revealed a high pH climate [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e].Framework tiny breaks are the most common type of damage in covered composite. These minor cracks degrade the characteristics of FRP composites and can serve as a precursor to other types of damage, resulting in disappointment. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e].Ellyin and Maser investigated the effects of dampness retention and exposure to a high pH environment on the mechanical properties of glass fibre supported polymer (GFRP) tubes, finding water damage at the Glass fibre interphase as water temperature increased [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e].Diffused water in the composites ends up in the network or at the interphase district. Water acts as a plasticizer in the network, expanding free volume, lowering glass progress temperature, and reducing the internal pressure that develops during composite handling. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e].Plasticization, expanding pressure, hydrolysis, and the formation of fractures are examples of natural opening events that could affect water dispersion in composites [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e]. Dampness Wicking along the fiber\u0026ndash;network interface weakens the interfacial link, resulting in a loss of underlying uprightness [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePolymer nanocomposites are a type of material that is new. They are better than traditional materials because they have stronger mechanical, thermal, and barrier properties. Nanocomposites have become better because of the tiny particles they use. These particles are very strong and have a unique shape that helps improve the nanocomposites. Materials that are very tiny have very good strength and abilities to handle pressure. Scientists have been working hard to change the way things are made really, really small. The amount, size, and shape of fillers added to a composite and how they mix with the material it's made of affects the composite's characteristics. We know that if we add tiny particles called nanoclays to a certain material, it will make the material much stiffer. Organo clay can withstand high heat and make things harder to melt or deform. So far, scientists have mostly been working with adding layered Silicate to plastic to make polymer nanocomposites. We don't know much about continuous fiber reinforced polymer nanocomposites. Making these strong materials isn't easy and it can be expensive. These are good for things that need to be both light and strong, especially if they might get hit really hard when being used at high temperatures.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn light of the prior discussion, it was decided that more attention should be paid to the natural effects of nano phased vinylesters and their fiber-supported composites. It is envisaged that the overall appearance of FRP composites will improve, and that their use will be extended without any concern about sturdiness. Furthermore, if a plan life of 15\u0026ndash;50 years is required for composites applications, it is unlikely that tests on materials or constructions will be conducted for long enough to span the plan lifetime. As a result, there is a strong need for accelerated lifespan portrayal philosophies to ensure the honesty and safety of major characters. Thegoal of this research is to combine advances in nanoclay application with accelerated maturation studies to focus on long-term sturdiness. The purpose of this review is to better understand the long-term behavior of nanoclay GFRP composites, as well as the differences in long-term properties of polymers with and without nanoclay expansion. The study presented here is critical for achieving the overall goal of increasing the strength of fiber-supported composites using nanoclay.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"2. Experimental","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.1 Materials\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eEcmas Hyderabad provided the network gum used in this study, ECMALON 9911 Bisphenol epoxy-based vinyl ester pitch. Cobalt naphthenate, methyl ethyl ketone peroxide, di-Methyl acetamide were used as restorative agents. Montmorillonite K-10 (MMT) nanoclays were used, which were given by Sigma-Aldrich. Vetrotex, India, supplied 200gsm glass strands with an emulsion-based estimation specialist and a plain-woven texture type.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.2 Nanocomposites preparation\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe nanocomposites were created in two stages: nanoclay/vinylester gel coat ultrasonic planning and gel coat/glass overlays development. For two hours, ultrasonication was employed to scatter nanoclays ranging from 0 to 8 wt% (27 kHz). To start the cross-connecting process, 2 wt% each of Di-Methyl acetamide, Cobalt napthalate, and methyl ethyl ketone peroxide (MEKP) were pre-blended in mud/vinyl ester at room temperature as advertiser, gas pedal, and impetus. A manual lay-up procedure with a glass supported gel finish was used to create the nanocomposite coatings. The fibre-to-tar ratio was kept constant at 65:35, and the samples were left to rest at room temperature for 24 hours.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.3 Alkali immersion\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe soluble base openness is especially significant for marine grade polymer composites since it is an irreversible cycle. In a similar fashion to accelerated maturation, the moisture that the composite maintains will deteriorate the composite's properties. The salt arrangement was made with 1.4 percent KOH, 1% NaOH, 0.16 percent Ca (OH)\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e, and purified water. The pH of the solution was determined to be 13.5 using a pH meter. To assess the impact of nanoclay on FRP nanocomposites while inundated in a high pH antacid solution, one set of experiments was immersed in room temperature salt solution.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.3 Characterization\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.3.1 Mechanical Properties\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAccording to ASTM D 790, the examples were tested for flexural characteristics. Flexural testing was carried out using samples 80838mm in a 3-Point Bending setup. The pliable sample 208 12.7 3 mm with a check length of 90 mm were tested in accordance with ASTM-D 3039 using a 5 mm/min cross head speed. The greater shear pressure existent between any two layers of an overlay material, measured in N/mm2, is referred to as Entomb Laminar Shear Strength (ILSS). ILSS testing was performed using 45mm X 6mm X 3mm examples in a 3-Point Bending configuration according to ASTM 2344. Kalpak Industry, Pune, India, delivered a 10-ton limit PC controlled greater precision Universal Testing Machine for the malleable, flexural, and ILSS tests. Low-speed sway tests were performed on un-scored instances 6412.73 mm at 111.4 mm/s using an instrumented sway analyzer furnished by M/s IN Equip Ltd., Mumbai, in accordance with ASTM D-256. The Izod test examples were clasped in an upright posture such that the example's finish faced its striking edge and the effect energy absorbed for breaking the example could be easily measured.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.3.2 Effect of Nanoclay on Mechanical Properties\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eMechanical properties such as Ultimate tensile strength(UTS), Flexural strength (FS), Inter laminar shear strength (ILSS) and Vickers\u0026rsquo;s Hardness (VHN) of the nanocomposites were characterized. UTS increased by 39% in glass/Vinyl ester/nanoclay composites for 3 wt % loading of nanoclay when compared with glass/epoxy composites. For the same loading level of nanoclay, there was 15% increase in UTS in Vinyl ester /nanoclay composites when compared with epoxy neat casting. The increase in 5 wt % nanoclay dispersed composites did not show any noticeable improvement and the same decreased in case of 8 wt% samples. The Flexural strength of 3wt% nanoclay samples showed 10.6% in glass/ Vinyl ester /nanoclay composites when compared with glass/ Vinyl ester. For the same loading of nanoclay, there was 20% increase of flexural strength in Vinyl ester /nanoclay composites when compared with neat casting. The 5 and 8 wt % nanoclay composites were not of any significance. The ILSS of 3 wt% and 5 wt% of nanoclay samples showed an increment of 40% and 31% respectively for glass/ Vinyl ester /nanoclay samples compared with glass/ Vinyl ester composites. The Vickers hardness of the samples for 3 wt% of nanoclay showed an increment of 26% for glass/ Vinyl ester /nanoclay compared with Vinyl ester /glass. The same improvement was 39% in Vinyl ester /nanoclay when compared with neat casting. The 5 wt% of nanoclay dispersed specimens showed an increment of 10% in glass/ Vinyl ester /nanoclay when compared with Vinyl ester /glass. Vinyl ester /nanoclay samples showed 30% increase in hardness when compared with Vinyl ester /nanoclay. Whereas the 8 wt% of nanoclay dispersed specimens of nanoclay/ Vinyl ester /glass showed drop in hardness. The improvements in mechanical properties of 3 wt% of nanoclay are due to the improved interfacial bonding between fibers and matrix modified by the nanoclay. The large holes in the nanocomposite samples were the main cause of the deterioration of the mechanical properties of the 5 wt% and 8 wt% samples. The large holes were created during the mixing process of the hardener, clay and resin combination. The reason was that the mixture became too viscous and slow even with increasing nanoclay loading. Adding more nanoclay increased the viscosity of the clay-resin mixture. As the hardener was injected and mixed, large air bubbles formed easily and were contained within the slow-moving mixture. The finished product will blister as it cures. These two percentages indicated less improvement in mechanical properties when later tested in UTM, possibly because the internal bubbles could not withstand the force and caused cracks to propagate through the sample.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.3.3 Effect of Flammability test\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eHorizontal Burning rate tests\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe flammability property of the samples improves constantly with the increase of nanoclay wt%. The HBR tests results with different wt% of nanoclay samples are tabulated in Table\u0026nbsp;2. 1. The 8wt% nanoclay samples showed a decrement in burning rate of about 56% and 47% for glass/ Vinyl ester /nanoclay and Vinyl ester /nanoclay samples respectively. The 5 wt% nanoclay samples showed a decrease in burning rate of about 40% and 33% for glass/ Vinyl ester /nanoclay and Vinyl ester /nanoclay samples respectively. The 3 wt% nanoclay samples showed a decrement in burning rate of about 27% and 16% for glass/ Vinyl ester /nanoclay and Vinyl ester /nanoclay samples respectively. It is seen that 8 wt% nanoclay samples showed less burning rate than 5 and 3 wt% nanoclay samples. Hence nanoclay acts like a flame retardant.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2.1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHorizontal burning rates Epoxy/glass/nanoclay and Epoxy/nanoclay\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"3\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWt % of\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNanoclay\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHBR\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e(mm/min)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHBR\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e(mm/min)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e117.18\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e31.1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e85.22\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e26.0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e70.09\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20.8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e51.51\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e16.4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eVertical Burning rate tests\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe VBR tests results are tabulated in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2.2\u003c/span\u003e. Among the different wt% of nanoclay samples the 8 wt% nanoclay samples showed a maximum decrement in burning rate of about 46.81% and 14% for glass/ Vinyl ester /nanoclay and Vinyl ester /nanoclay samples respectively. The 5 wt% nanoclay samples showed a decrement in burning rate of about 31.51% and 6% for glass/ Vinyl ester /nanoclay and Vinyl ester /nanoclay samples respectively. The 3 wt% nanoclay samples showed a decrement in burning rate of 20% and 3.1% for glass/ Vinyl ester /nanoclay and Vinyl ester /nanoclay samples respectively. It is seen that 8 wt% nanoclay samples showed less burning rate than 5 and 3 wt% nanoclay samples. Hence nanoclay acts like a flame retardant.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2.2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eVertical burning rates Epoxy/glass/nanoclay and Epoxy/nanoclay\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"3\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWt% of\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNanoclay\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eVBR\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e(mm/min)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eVBR\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e(mm/min)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e77.3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e75\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e75\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e60\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e73\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e51.37\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e66.9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e39.89\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec10\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.3.4 Fire Retardancy of nanocomposites\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAs a heat barrier that prevents heat from entering unpyrolyzed material and, more importantly, as the surface temperature rises, increases the surface re-radiation heat losses, the formation of a surface layer during the pyrolysis of nanocomposites was traditionally thought to be the primary factor in improved fire retardancy.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe polymeric materials were investigated for the mechanical properties and fire retardancy. The mechanical test studies showed increase in the mechanical properties at 3 wt% of nanoclay for the glass/ Vinyl ester /nanoclay and Vinyl ester /nanoclay samples. This is due to the improved interfacial bonding between the fibers and the surrounding mattrix. Adding nanoclay into the samples reduced the flammability and hence nanoclay acts as a good flame retardant. Since this layer acts as a heat barrier to stop heat from transferring into unpyrolyzed material and more importantly increases the surface re-radiation heat losses as the surface temperature increases, the formation of a barrier surface between the neighbouring layers during pyrolysis of nanocomposites was traditionally thought to be the primary factor in improved fire retardancy. Therefore, it can be concluded that in order to achieve outstanding mechanical qualities, the nanoclay content should be maintained at 3 wt%.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNanoclay/epoxy/glass composites were fabricated and tested for mechanical properties and fire retardancy. Based on the experimental results the following conclusions were arrived at: The mechnaical properties of nanoclay/epoxy/glass and nanoclay/epoxy compsoites showed greatest improvemnts at 3 wt % of nanoclay dispersion. The fire retarancy in the nanoclay dispersed composites improved with nanoclay addition and the improvement was monotonic with the loading levels of nanoclay in the testing range.Scanning electron microscopy revealed good dispersion at 3 wt % of nanoclay whereas at higher percentages the nanoclay agglomerates were observed.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"3. Results and discussion","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.1 Alkali exposure\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe wetness retention (M) of the two composites shown in the Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3.1\u003c/span\u003e is the highest (1). Vinylester/glass composites were determined to have the most wetness ingestion. The Nanoclay/Vinylester/glass composites with an 8wt% Nanoclay/Vinylester/glass content had the lowest wetness retention. Because of the hydrophobic nature of Nanoclay in vinylester, which repels water particles and prevents water entry into the composite, there is less antacid ingestion if there is an occurrence of 8wt percent Nanoclay/Vinylester/glass. If an occurrence of 100 days occurs, the lattice corruption is increased due to more moisture intake in the event of a lengthy length. This is because fundamental climatic maturation of polymers can produce damage through enraging, small breaking, and other morphological modifications, allowing for more dampness ingestion.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab3\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 3.1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMaximum Moisture absorption, maximum moisture uptake (alkali solution) slope and diffusion co-efficient\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWeight percentage of nanoclay\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMaximum moisture absorption\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMaximum moisture uptake %\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eslope of the absorption curve\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDiffusion coefficient mm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e /s\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0%\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.853\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.558\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.132\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9.53X10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;7\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2%\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.759\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.289\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.45X10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;7\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4%\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.691\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.936\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.091\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.51X10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;7\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6%\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.63\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.18\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.074\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.98X10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;7\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8%\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.55\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.28\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.064\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.98X10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;7\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe effect of Alkali exposure for Vinylester/glass and different weight percent Nanoclay/Vinylester/glass composites shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3.1\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.2. UTS, Flexural Strength, ILSS and impact degradations\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFigure 3.2 shows the response of the composite frameworks to salt conditions as a function of rigidity as a component of length of openness (2). The examples after soluble base openness indicate significant development in debasement with openness schedule expansion. The UTS rate for vinylester/glass composites is decreasing. The temperature was kept at room temperature throughout the first 100 hours of openness. Among the five composites studied, 4 percent nanoclay/vinylester/glass composites perform the best, while vinylester/glass composites perform worst.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe filtering electron micrographs provide strong evidence of the limiting between the pitch and the fibre prior to the openness, as well as the openness afterward. The corruption in the fibre network interfacial holding has resulted in a decline in mechanical characteristics of examples due to the openness to salt climate. The main reason for dampness dissemination is the voids that exist in the network. The captured water might be stored in the small breaks framed during composite ready or by the aid condition.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSEM images can be used to track the voids and micro breaks in the samples. Following 100 hours of exposure, the broken instances showed fibre break as well as fibre pull out. Following 100 hours of exposure, the Vinylestetr/glass composites demonstrated a higher level of framework plasticization than the Nanoclay/Vinylester/glass composites. As a result, in each case, framework corruption increased as the term of openness increased. If there is an occurrence of Vinylestetr/glass composites, the lattice corruption is greater because more moisture retention occurs in this case. This is because high pH alkalinity can cause damage by causing enraging, tiny breaking, and other morphological abnormalities, allowing for additional moisture consumption. However, when the drenching period increased, the fibre surfaces of the samples submerged in the alkyl arrangement showed reduced passion. Because of the powerless fiber-lattice holding, the fibre surface appears to be rather immaculate. The disappointment mode was visible in SEM images of elastic broken unexposed Vinylestetr/glass and Nanoclay/Vinylestetr/glass samples due to fibre breaking. Many passions may be seen on the fiber's outer layer, where the framework has clung to the fibre long after it has broken. This demonstrates that before corruption, there is a strong link between the fibre and the grid.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAlkali retention is expected to the nanoclay in vinylester if 8wt percent nanoclay/vinylester/glass is used, due to the hydrophobic nature of the earth, which builds the boundary layer to allow water particles to enter the composite and prevents water infiltration. The rate of mechanical property loss is due to moisture ingestion, which causes composites to expand as well as delamination between fibre and grid. The salty environment induces GFRP embrittlement and capillary micro breaks, resulting in a significant loss in longitudinal and cross-sectional mechanical characteristics. In the UTS, FS, ILSS, and Impact instances, 4wt percent nanoclay/vinylester/glass outperformed vinylester/glass in terms of lesser corruption upsides. SEM images of a pliable, unexposed pliable example. The disappointment mode was demonstrated in many nanoclay/vinylester/glass cases due to fibre breakage. The framework clung to the fibre even after it was broken, as evidenced by the several tempers visible on the outer layer of the fibre. This demonstrates that before corruption, there is a strong link between the fibre and the network. For the specimens soaked in the alkyl arrangement, however, as the drenching duration increased, less temper was visible on the fibre surfaces. The powerless fiber-grid holding is responsible for the rather flawless fibre surface. When compared to vinylester/glass composites, nanoclay/vinylester/glass composites with 4wt% nanoclay/vinylester/glass composites showed improved performance in antacid climate moulding.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthical Approval:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eThis Declaration is \u0026ldquo;not applicable\u0026rdquo;.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding :\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eThis Declaration is \u0026ldquo;not applicable\u0026rdquo;.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAvailability of data and materials:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eAll the data we mentioned in this paper are part of our study and self generated.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConflict of interest statement\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare the following conflict of competing interests: The authors of this manuscript have directly participated in the planning, execution, or analysis of this study. The authors of the paper have read and approved the final version submitted. We declare that the paper is original, has not been submitted for publication in other journals and has not already been published.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRay SS, Okamoto M (2018) Polymer/layered silicate nanocomposites: a review from preparation to processing. Prog Polym Sci 28:1539\u0026ndash;1641\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSchmidt D, Shah D, Giannelis EP (2019) New Advances in Polymer/Layered Silicate Nanocomposites. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 6(3):205\u0026ndash;212\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBhat G, Hegde1 RR, Kamath MG, Deshpande B(2018),Nanoclay Reinforced Fibers and Nonwovens. J Eng Fibers Fabr, 3(3), 22\u0026ndash;34\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAlexandre M, Dubois P (2017) Polymer-layered silicate nanocomposites: preparation, properties and uses of a new class of materials. Mater Sci Eng 28:1\u0026ndash;63\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAlmagableh PR, Mantena A, Alostaz W, Liu LT, Drzal (2019) eXPRESS Polym Lett Vol 3:724\u0026ndash;732\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDiparay,Suparnasengupta SPS (2016) Preparation and properties of vinyl este resin/clay Nanocomposites. Macromol Mater Eng 291:1513\u0026ndash;1520\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eArun KSubramain CT, Sun (2017) The use of nanoclay plates to enhance compressive strength of fiber reinforced composites,18th American society of compositesconference\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHaque A, Hossain F, D, M.Shamsuzzoha (2018) S2-glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Nanocomposites: Manufacturing,Structures, Thermal and Mechanical Properties. J ofComposite Mater 276:151\u0026ndash;155\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKanny K, Moodley PJVK (2018) Mechanical and tribulogicla behaviour of clay-polypropylene nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 43:7230\u0026ndash;7238\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhao Z, Gou J, Bietto S, Ibeh C, Hui D (2019) Fire retardancy of clay/carbon nanofiber hybrid sheet in fiber reinforced polymer composites. Compos Sci Technol 69:2081\u0026ndash;2087\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSreejith M, Narasimha Murthy HN, Rai KS, Krishna M, Jeena JK (2017) Hygrothermic behavior of carbon/vinylester, glass/vinylester, carbon/epoxy and glass/epoxy composites. Iran Polym J 19(2):89\u0026ndash;103\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFabienne Samyn S, Bourbigot C, Jama, Se verine Bellayer (2018) Fire retardancy of polymer clay nanocomposites: Is there an influence of thenanomorphology. Polym Degrad Stab 93:2019\u0026ndash;2024\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eIn-Yup Jeon and Jong-Beom Baek (2017) Nanocomposites Derived from Polymers and Inorganic Nanoparticles, Materials, vol. 3, pp.3654\u0026ndash;3674\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDiparay,Suparna sengupta SPS (2016) Preparation and properties of vinyl este resin/clay Nanocomposites. Macromol Mater Eng 291:1513\u0026ndash;1520\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLin L-Y, Lee Joong-H Chang- Eui Hong, Gye- Hyoung Yoo and Suresh Advani, (2016) Preparation and Characterization of Layered silicate/glass fiber/epoxy Hybrid Nanocomposites via Vacuum- assisted Resin Transfer Molding (VARTM). Compos Sci Technol, vol.66, pp. 2116\u0026ndash;2125\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYuan Xua and Suong Van Hoa (2018) Mechanical Properties of Carbon fiber Reinforced Epoxy/clay Nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 68:854\u0026ndash;861\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZheng Y, Zheng Y, Ning R (2017) Effects of Nanoparticles SiO2 on the Performance of Nanocomposites. Mater Lett 57:2940\u0026ndash;2944\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLin JC, Chang LC, Nien MH, Ho HL (2016) Mechanical Behavior of Various Nanoparticle Filled Composites at Low Velocity Impact. 74:30\u0026ndash;36Composite Structures\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLeBaron PC, Wang Z, Pinnavaia TJ (2018) Polymer-Layered Silicate Nanocomposites: An Overview, Applied Clay Science, vol. 15, pp. 11\u0026ndash;29\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGiannelis EP (2017) Polymer-Layered Silicate Nanocomposites: Synthesis, Properties, Applied Organomettalic Chemistry, vol. 12, pp. 675\u0026ndash;680\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKong ZX, Wang JH (2019) Interlaminar Shear Strength of Glass Fiber Reinforced Dially Phthalate Laminates Enhanced with Nanoclays. Adv Mater Res vol.79\u0026ndash;82 pp.1779\u0026ndash;82\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhong-bin Xu Wei-wei, Kong Ming-xing, Zhou maoP (2018) Effect of surface modification of Montmorillonite on the properties of rigid polyurethane foam composites. Chin J Polym Sci 28(4):615\u0026ndash;624\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Montmorillonite, nanoclay, Mechanical, Fire retardancy","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3870050/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3870050/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eThe goal of this study was to see how mud content affected nanoclay/vinylester/glass composites submerged in 13.5 pH soluble solutions for up to 100 days. The corruptions in UTS, Impact characteristics, Flexural Strength and Interlaminar Shear Strength were investigated, as well as the samples' diffusivity. Vinylester/glass composites, have the highest dampness retention of 0.85 percent, while 8wt percent nanoclay/vinylester/glass nanocomposites have the lowest dampness retention of 0.55 percent. The diffusion co-efficient was determined to be 9.53X10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;13\u003c/sup\u003e m\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e/sec for nanoclay/vinyl ester/glass composites with 8wt percent and 2.98X10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;13\u003c/sup\u003e m\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e/sec for nanoclay/vinyl ester/glass composites with 8wt percent.Mechanical characteristics dropped at a faster rate as a result of moisture retention. In comparison to vinylester/glass composites, 4wt% nanoclay/vinylester/glass composites displayed improved performance in salt environment moulding of all composite classes. XRD was used to concentrate scattering, and Scanning Electron Microscopy was used to focus on the ductile cracked samples.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Studies on diffusion of moisture through nanoclay/vinylester/glass nanocomposites","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-01-19 11:00:25","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3870050/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"b0fb68b7-f8a9-4231-affa-70f01a48de93","owner":[],"postedDate":"January 19th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2024-02-28T06:16:44+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2024-01-19 11:00:25","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-3870050","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-3870050","identity":"rs-3870050","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}