Tuning viscoelasticity and fine structure of living materials via synthetic adhesion logic and rheological perturbations

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

The paper studied how multicellular engineered living materials made from living bacteria can have their rheological and viscoelastic properties tuned using synthetic cell-cell adhesins with varied adhesion strength, cell size/shape, and adhesion logic. Using rheological perturbations, the authors found that prior results from non-living materials also extend to bacterial ELMs, and that controlling rheology can shape microscopic fine structure by controlling cell aggregation and particle rearrangement. The main caveat is that the work focuses on bacterial engineered living materials as a controllable model system rather than directly testing biomedical tissues or disease states. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Engineered living materials (ELMs) at the multicelluar level represent an innovation that promises programmable properties for biomedical, environmental, and consumer applications. However, the rational tuning of the mechanical properties of such ELMs from first principles remains a challenge. Here we use synthetic cell-cell adhesins to systematically characterize how rheological and viscoelastic properties of multicellular materials made from living bacteria can be tuned via adhesin strength, cell size and shape, and adhesion logic. We confirmed that the previous results obtained for non-living materials also apply to bacterial ELMs. Additionally, the incorporation of synthetic adhesins, combined with the adaptability of bacterial cells in modifying various cellular parameters, now enables novel and precise control over material properties. Furthermore, we demonstrate that rheology is a powerful tool for actively shaping the microscopic structure of ELMs, enabling control over cell aggregation and particle rearrangement, a key feature for complex material design. These results deepen our understanding of tuning the viscoelastic properties and fine structure of ELMs for applications like bioprinting and microbial consortia design including natural systems.
Full text 1,363 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Engineered living materials (ELMs) at the multicelluar level represent an innovation that promises programmable properties for biomedical, environmental, and consumer applications. However, the rational tuning of the mechanical properties of such ELMs from first principles remains a challenge. Here we use synthetic cell-cell adhesins to systematically characterize how rheological and viscoelastic properties of multicellular materials made from living bacteria can be tuned via adhesin strength, cell size and shape, and adhesion logic. We confirmed that the previous results obtained for non-living materials also apply to bacterial ELMs. Additionally, the incorporation of synthetic adhesins, combined with the adaptability of bacterial cells in modifying various cellular parameters, now enables novel and precise control over material properties. Furthermore, we demonstrate that rheology is a powerful tool for actively shaping the microscopic structure of ELMs, enabling control over cell aggregation and particle rearrangement, a key feature for complex material design. These results deepen our understanding of tuning the viscoelastic properties and fine structure of ELMs for applications like bioprinting and microbial consortia design including natural systems. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-04T02:00:05.705006+00:00