Predictive vision-language integration in the human visual cortex

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

This paper investigated how linguistic and visual information interact in the human brain by collecting a large-scale fMRI dataset and building AI-based encoding models to test multimodal integration across visual cortex areas, including early visual cortex. The authors found cross-modal prior information modulates neural responses in EVC, and that integration there is governed by prediction errors consistent with predictive coding theory. Distinct EVC neuronal populations showed enhanced versus suppressed responses to semantically matched cross-modal stimuli, with the suppression population carrying denser behaviorally relevant semantic information, and the two populations supporting semantic integration with different temporal dynamics and representational structures. The paper’s main limitation is that it relies on fMRI encoding-model inferences to characterize neural computations from measured BOLD signals. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Integrating linguistic and visual information is a core function of human cognition, yet how information from these two modalities interacts in the brain remains largely unknown. Competing frameworks, including the hub-and-spoke model and Bayesian theories such as predictive coding, offer conflicting accounts of how the brain achieves multimodal integration. To address this question, we collected a large-scale fMRI dataset and leveraged state-of-the-art AI systems to construct encoding models that probe how the human brain matches and integrates linguistic and visual information. We found that prior information from one modality can modulate neural responses in another, even in the early visual cortex (EVC). Integration neural response in EVC is governed by prediction errors consistent with predictive coding theory. Enhanced and suppressed neural responses to semantically matched cross-modal stimuli were found in distinct EVC populations, with suppression population carrying denser, behaviorally relevant semantic information. Both populations support semantic integration with distinct temporal dynamics and representational structures. These findings provide representational- and computational-level insights into how the brain integrates information across modalities, revealing unified principles of information processing that link biological and artificial intelligence.
Full text 1,479 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Integrating linguistic and visual information is a core function of human cognition, yet how information from these two modalities interacts in the brain remains largely unknown. Competing frameworks, including the hub-and-spoke model and Bayesian theories such as predictive coding, offer conflicting accounts of how the brain achieves multimodal integration. To address this question, we collected a large-scale fMRI dataset and leveraged state-of-the-art AI systems to construct encoding models that probe how the human brain matches and integrates linguistic and visual information. We found that prior information from one modality can modulate neural responses in another, even in the early visual cortex (EVC). Integration neural response in EVC is governed by prediction errors consistent with predictive coding theory. Enhanced and suppressed neural responses to semantically matched cross-modal stimuli were found in distinct EVC populations, with suppression population carrying denser, behaviorally relevant semantic information. Both populations support semantic integration with distinct temporal dynamics and representational structures. These findings provide representational- and computational-level insights into how the brain integrates information across modalities, revealing unified principles of information processing that link biological and artificial intelligence. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-04T02:00:05.705006+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0