ACTUAL ISSUES OF DIAGNOSIS OF DEEP INFILTRATIVE ENDOMETRIOSIS

article OA: green CC0
🔓 Open OA copy Full text JSON View on OpenAlex
⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-17 · read from full text ⓘ

This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and colonoscopy for identifying deep infiltrative endometriosis in a cohort of 139 women. Ultrasound demonstrated the highest sensitivity at 91.8% and specificity at 98.2%, outperforming MRI and bimanual examination, while colonoscopy revealed rectal wall deformation in over 70% of cases. The authors note that these diagnostic tools are essential for mapping lesion extent to facilitate multidisciplinary surgical planning and preparation. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically the diagnostic evaluation and preoperative assessment of deep infiltrating lesions.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to determine the prognostic value of clinical data, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), colonoscopy for the diagnosis of deep infiltrative endometriosis (DIE). Materials and methods. The study included 139 patients with external genital endometriosis, 68 of whom confirmed DIE. The comparison group consisted of 71 women without signs of DIE. Conducted general clinical, ultrasound, MRI of the pelvis, colonoscopy, biopsy of the mucous membrane of the rectum. All patients underwent surgical treatment followed by a morphological examination. Statistical analysis was performed using the statistical package Statistica 7.0. The χ² indicator was considered (p <0.05 was considered statistically significant). Non-parametric Mann-Whitney test, sensitivity, specificity, the prognostic value of positive and negative results, likelihood ratio of positive and negative results. Laparoscopy and pathologic indicators were the «gold standard» for diagnosis anatomical research. Results. There were no significant differences in clinical symptoms between patients. The sensitivity and specificity of the bimanual study to detect infiltration were 89.7 % and 84.5 %, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of DIE – 91.8 % and 98.2 %, MRI – 85.15 % and 93.75 %, respectively. In 73.3 % of cases, a colonoscopy revealed the deformation of the anterior wall of the rectum in the projection of the infiltration location. According to the rectal biopsy in three cases out of fifteen revealed «focal endometriosis». Application. Obstetrics and gynecology. Summary. This study allows determines the location and amount of infiltration; to assess the degree of involvement in the pathological process of nearby organs, which is necessary for the formation of a multidisciplinary surgical team and prepare the necessary equipment, and develop a perioperative plan of patients.
Full text 6,515 characters · extracted from oa-html · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to determine the prognostic value of clinical data, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), colonoscopy for the diagnosis of deep infiltrative endometriosis (DIE).

Materials

and methods. The study included 139 patients with external genital endometriosis, 68 of whom confirmed DIE. The comparison group consisted of 71 women without signs of DIE. Conducted general clinical, ultrasound, MRI of the pelvis, colonoscopy, biopsy of the mucous membrane of the rectum. All patients underwent surgical treatment followed by a morphological examination. Statistical analysis was performed using the statistical package Statistica 7.0. The χ² indicator was considered (p <0.05 was considered statistically significant). Non-parametric Mann-Whitney test, sensitivity, specificity, the prognostic value of positive and negative results, likelihood ratio of positive and negative results. Laparoscopy and pathologic indicators were the «gold standard» for diagnosis anatomical research. Results. There were no significant differences in clinical symptoms between patients. The sensitivity and specificity of the bimanual study to detect infiltration were 89.7 % and 84.5 %, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of DIE – 91.8 % and 98.2 %, MRI – 85.15 % and 93.75 %, respectively. In 73.3 % of cases, a colonoscopy revealed the deformation of the anterior wall of the rectum in the projection of the infiltration location. According to the rectal biopsy in three cases out of fifteen revealed «focal endometriosis». Application. Obstetrics and gynecology. Summary. This study allows determines the location and amount of infiltration; to assess the degree of involvement in the pathological process of nearby organs, which is necessary for the formation of a multidisciplinary surgical team and prepare the necessary equipment, and develop a perioperative plan of patients.

Keywords

Article Details Information about financing and conflict of interests The authors declare that they have no apparent or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. How to Cite

References

Ugwumadu L, Chakrabarti R, Williams-Brown E, Rendle J, Swift I, John B, et al. The role of the multidisciplinary team in the management of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Gynecol Surg. 2017; 14(1): 15. doi: 10.1186/s10397-017-1018-0 Alborzi S, Rasekhi A, Shomali Z, Madadi G, Alborzi M, Kazemi M, Hosseini Nohandani A. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging, transvaginal, and transrectal ultrasonographyin deep infiltrating endometriosis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97(8): e9536. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009536 Zannoni L, Del Forno S, Coppola F, Papadopoulos D, Valerio D, Golfieri R et al. Comparison of transvaginal sonography and computed tomography-colonography with contrast media and urographic phase for diagnosing deep infiltrating endometriosis of the posterior compartment of the pelvis: a pilot study. Jpn J Radiol. 2017; 35(9): 546-554. doi: 10.1007/s11604-017-0665-4. Epub 2017 Jul 12 Nisenblat V, Bossuyt PM, Farquhar C, Johnson N, Hull ML. Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 2: CD009591. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009591.pub2 Saba L, Sulcis R, Melis GB, Cecco CN, Laghi A, Piga M, Guerriero S. Endometriosis: the role of magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Radiol. 2015; 56(3): 355-367. doi: 10.1177/0284185114526086 Guerriero S, Alcázar JL, Pascual MA, Ajossa S, Perniciano M, Piras A. et al. Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis: Comparison Between 2-Dimensional Ultrasonography (US), 3-Dimensional US, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J Ultrasound Med. 2018; 37(6): 1511-1521. doi: 10.1002/jum.14496 Piessens S, Healey M, Maher P, Tsaltas J, Rombauts L. Can anyone screen for deep infiltrating endometriosis with transvaginal ultrasound? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014; 54(5): 462-468. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12242 Eisenberg VH, Alcazar JL, Arbib N, Schiff E, Achiron R, Goldenberg M et al. Applying a statistical method in transvaginal ultrasound training: lessons from the learning curve cumulative summation test (LC-CUSUM) for endometriosis mapping. Gynecol. Surg. 2017; 14(1): 19. DOI: 10.1186/ogs.10397-017-1022-4 Nisenblat V, Prentice L, Bossuyt PM, Farquhar C, Hull ML, Johnson N. Combination of the non-invasive tests for the diagnosis of endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 7: CD012281. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012281 Chapron C, Marcellin L, Borghese B, Santulli P. Rethinking mechanisms, diagnosis and management of endometriosis. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2019; 15(11): 666-682. doi: 10.1038/s41574-019-0245-z Charles Chapron, Jing-He Lang, Jin-Hua Leng, Yingfang Zhou, Xinmei Zhang, Min Xue et al. Factors and regional differences associated with endometriosis: a multi-country, casecontrol study. Adv. Ther. 2016; 33: 1385-1407. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0366-x Bazot M, Daraï E. Diagnosis of deep endometriosis: clinical examination, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and other techniques. Fertil Steril. 2017; 108(6): 886-894. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.10.026 Guerriero S, Condous G, Van den Bosch T, Valentin L, Leone FP, Van Schoubroeck D, et al. Systematic approach to sonographic evaluation of the pelvis in women with suspected endometriosis, including terms, defini- tions and measurements: a consensus opinion from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 48(3): 318-332. doi: 10.1002/uog.15955. Epub 2016 Jun 28 Zannoni L, Del Forno S, Coppola F, Papadopoulos D, Valerio D, Golfieri R et al. Comparison of transvaginal sonography and computed tomography-colonography with contrast media and urographic phase for diagnosing deep infiltrating endometriosis of the posterior compartment of the pelvis: a pilot study. Jpn J Radiol. 2017; 35(9): 546-554. doi: 10.1007/s11604-017-0665-4 Milone M, Mollo A, Musella M, Maietta P, Fernandez L, Shatalova O et al. Role of colonoscopy in the diagnostic work-up of bowel endometriosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015; 21(16): 4997-5001. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i16.4997 Badescu A, Roman H, Barsan I, Soldea V, Nastasia S, Aziz M. et al. Patterns of bowel invisible microscopic endometriosis reveal the goal of surgery removal of visual lesions only. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018; 25(3): 522-527. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.10.026

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosisdie_deep_infiltrating

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T07:38:20.277780+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK