Utility of a quantitative approach to microbial dysbiosis using machine learning in an African American cohort with self-reported hair loss

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Objective Hair loss is a common issue that affects a large proportion of the population, leading to lower self-confidence and quality of life. Microbial dysbiosis of the scalp has been shown to be associated with several different disorders leading to hair loss. Though several “microbiome friendly” cosmetic treatments are currently on the market, there is no agreement on the best technique for assessing dysbiosis leading to a lack of scientific rigor for quantifying the effective treatments. To help address this, the association between self-perceived hair loss and the scalp microbiome in an African-American cohort (n=36) was investigated. Methods Using a self-controlled design, swabs were collected from both “sparse” and “normal” scalp sites. The scalp microbiome was characterized via 16S rRNA gene sequencing and a dysbiosis score was calculated based on the proportion of all taxa within the samples. Further, we identified the taxa that contributed most to abnormal or dysbiotic hair sites using a machine learning random forest classifier and a negative binomial mixed effects model. Results The dysbiosis index is sensitive to participants self-assessment of hair loss and interindividual variation. We found a core set of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) assigned to 7 genera that significantly contributed to increased scalp dysbiosis. Conclusion This study demonstrates that self-perceived hair loss is associated with significant and measurable alterations in the scalp microbiome using, making the reported dysbiosis index a practical tool that may be used to assess microbiome changes following cosmetic or medical interventions for hair loss and other microbiome-associated disorders.
Full text 1,994 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Objective Hair loss is a common issue that affects a large proportion of the population, leading to lower self-confidence and quality of life. Microbial dysbiosis of the scalp has been shown to be associated with several different disorders leading to hair loss. Though several “microbiome friendly” cosmetic treatments are currently on the market, there is no agreement on the best technique for assessing dysbiosis leading to a lack of scientific rigor for quantifying the effective treatments. To help address this, the association between self-perceived hair loss and the scalp microbiome in an African-American cohort (n=36) was investigated.

Methods

Using a self-controlled design, swabs were collected from both “sparse” and “normal” scalp sites. The scalp microbiome was characterized via 16S rRNA gene sequencing and a dysbiosis score was calculated based on the proportion of all taxa within the samples. Further, we identified the taxa that contributed most to abnormal or dysbiotic hair sites using a machine learning random forest classifier and a negative binomial mixed effects model.

Results

The dysbiosis index is sensitive to participants self-assessment of hair loss and interindividual variation. We found a core set of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) assigned to 7 genera that significantly contributed to increased scalp dysbiosis.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that self-perceived hair loss is associated with significant and measurable alterations in the scalp microbiome using, making the reported dysbiosis index a practical tool that may be used to assess microbiome changes following cosmetic or medical interventions for hair loss and other microbiome-associated disorders. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Conflicts of Interest Statement: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. The manuscript has been updated with additional context in the introduction and discussion sections.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-04T02:00:05.705006+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0