Vitamin D is Glucoprotective in Aging Males but Not Females

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-15

This study investigated the sex-specific effects of vitamin D supplementation on glucose homeostasis and gene regulation in aged mice, finding it glucoprotective in males but not females.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-15 · read from full text

The study examined sex-specific effects of vitamin D supplementation on glucose homeostasis in an aged, non-obese mouse model, focusing on how vitamin D influences tissue-specific regulation of vitamin D receptor (VDR)-target genes involved in glucose regulation. The authors aimed to address inconsistencies between human adult trials of vitamin D for prediabetes/diabetes and the possibility that vitamin D deficiency affects dysglycemia more strongly in men than women, while also noting that serum measures of storage vitamin D may not reflect functional vitamin D status. The paper’s main finding was that vitamin D had glucoprotective effects in aging males but not in females, accompanied by sex-dependent differences in relevant gene regulation across tissues. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes is strongly linked to vitamin D deficiency in older adults. However, there is a discrepancy between clinical trials in adults on the efficacy of vitamin D treatment in prediabetes and diabetes. In addition, human data indicates there may be sexual dimorphism in the effect of vitamin D deficiency on dysglycemia that is more pronounced in men. These incongruities may be due to our limited understanding of the underlying mechanisms of vitamin D in glucose homeostasis among its vast target tissues across the body. Furthermore, vitamin D deficiency is diagnosed by low levels of a storage form of vitamin D, which may not be an accurate indicator of vitamin D status in these individuals. Thus, measuring expression levels of vitamin D receptor (VDR)-target genes across tissues involved in glucose regulation and vitamin D pathways may be a more promising marker of vitamin D status. Here we describe the sex-specific physiological effects of vitamin D supplementation in an aged, non-obese mouse model on glucose homeostasis and tissue-specific gene regulation.
Full text 1,364 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Type 2 diabetes is strongly linked to vitamin D deficiency in older adults. However, there is a discrepancy between clinical trials in adults on the efficacy of vitamin D treatment in prediabetes and diabetes. In addition, human data indicates there may be sexual dimorphism in the effect of vitamin D deficiency on dysglycemia that is more pronounced in men. These incongruities may be due to our limited understanding of the underlying mechanisms of vitamin D in glucose homeostasis among its vast target tissues across the body. Furthermore, vitamin D deficiency is diagnosed by low levels of a storage form of vitamin D, which may not be an accurate indicator of vitamin D status in these individuals. Thus, measuring expression levels of vitamin D receptor (VDR)-target genes across tissues involved in glucose regulation and vitamin D pathways may be a more promising marker of vitamin D status. Here we describe the sex-specific physiological effects of vitamin D supplementation in an aged, non-obese mouse model on glucose homeostasis and tissue-specific gene regulation. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes LEAD CONTACT: Olivia Z.B. Ginnard, Baylor College of Medicine/Children’s Nutrition Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, 1100 Bates Ave, Houston, TX 77030, Email: ginnard{at}bcm.edu

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-04T02:00:05.705006+00:00