The human handprint in shaping plant diversity in urban environments

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

Urban plant assemblages comprise mixtures of native and non-native species distributed across a variety of urban green space (UGS) types, yet we lack an integrated understanding of how plant diversity and composition varies across UGS that differ in the degree to which communities arise through self-assembly versus human facilitation. Here, we address the gap based on a comprehensive dataset of 180 plant communities sampled across three Swiss cities (Zurich, Geneva, and Lugano) and five UGS types— allotments, private gardens, parks, residential estates, and ruderal areas— to quantify α- and β-diversity patterns and their underlying social-ecological drivers. To identify drivers of plant diversity and composition, we used landscape predictors, such as climatic conditions and built environment, and local predictors, such as maintenance and conservation management performed by UGS managers, and habitat design. We found that plant community composition does partially differentiate among UGS types. While private gardens, parks, and real estate showed greater overlap, ruderal sites and allotments exhibited distinct species communities. Yet, these two UGS types are also the ones most threatened by urban densification, highlighting potential conflicts between urban densification and biodiversity conservation. Moreover, although the non-native plant richness increased along a human investment gradient, native plant richness remained stable. Lastly, by jointly analyzing alpha and beta diversity, our study shows that urban social-ecological conditions can simultaneously constrain local species richness, while promoting compositional differentiation among sites. By integrating ecological and social dimensions, this study provides a unique greenspace-wide perspective that can inform biodiversity-oriented urban planning and management.
Full text 2,701 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Urban plant assemblages comprise mixtures of native and non-native species distributed across a variety of urban green space (UGS) types, yet we lack an integrated understanding of how plant diversity and composition varies across UGS that differ in the degree to which communities arise through self-assembly versus human facilitation. Here, we address the gap based on a comprehensive dataset of 180 plant communities sampled across three Swiss cities (Zurich, Geneva, and Lugano) and five UGS types— allotments, private gardens, parks, residential estates, and ruderal areas— to quantify α- and β-diversity patterns and their underlying social-ecological drivers. To identify drivers of plant diversity and composition, we used landscape predictors, such as climatic conditions and built environment, and local predictors, such as maintenance and conservation management performed by UGS managers, and habitat design. We found that plant community composition does partially differentiate among UGS types. While private gardens, parks, and real estate showed greater overlap, ruderal sites and allotments exhibited distinct species communities. Yet, these two UGS types are also the ones most threatened by urban densification, highlighting potential conflicts between urban densification and biodiversity conservation. Moreover, although the non-native plant richness increased along a human investment gradient, native plant richness remained stable. Lastly, by jointly analyzing alpha and beta diversity, our study shows that urban social-ecological conditions can simultaneously constrain local species richness, while promoting compositional differentiation among sites. By integrating ecological and social dimensions, this study provides a unique greenspace-wide perspective that can inform biodiversity-oriented urban planning and management. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2CQ21 Life Sciences Urban biodiversity, Native and non-native plants, Meta community, Alpha and Beta diversity, Gardening, Urban green spaces, Plant assemblages, Urban vegetation Published: 2026-04-24 10:06 Last Updated: 2026-04-24 10:06 CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Conflict of interest statement: None Data and Code Availability Statement: Open data/code are not available. Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-04T02:00:05.705006+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0