Assessment of obstetric and gynaecological problems in females with bleeding disorders
This prospective study of 30 women with bleeding disorders found that gynecological issues like menorrhagia and endometriosis, alongside obstetric complications such as postpartum hemorrhage, are prevalent.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This prospective observational study evaluated obstetric and gynecological complications in 30 women with known inherited bleeding disorders, such as idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and von Willebrand’s disease. The researchers identified that the majority of participants experienced significant issues, with menorrhagia being the most prevalent gynecological problem and postpartum hemorrhage the leading obstetric complication. While the study highlights the high frequency of these conditions, it explicitly notes that endometriosis was present in only a small minority of the cohort (4%). Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one of several gynecological problems observed in patients with bleeding disorders, though the paper's main focus is on hemostatic management rather than endometriosis pathology.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
4,616 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 5 sections
· click to expand
Background
Methods
Results
Conclusions
References
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (6)
- W2093266258 via openalex
- W2108061244 via openalex
- W2172256002 via openalex
- W2965870923 via openalex
- W4379250858 via openalex
- W7073617478 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00