A comparison of intrauterine insemination, intraperitoneal insemination, and natural intercourse in superovulated women

In: Fertility and Sterility · 1991 · vol. 56(6) , pp. 1183–1187 · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54739-6 · PMID:1743342 · W2397816240
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 5 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09

This study compared the effectiveness of intrauterine insemination, intraperitoneal insemination, and natural intercourse in women undergoing superovulation treatment.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

In a prospective comparison of IP, IUI, and natural intercourse following superovulation in couples diagnosed as having unexplained infertility, semen factors, or sperm antibodies, pregnancy rates were found to be significantly higher after IP. Pregnancy rates were also higher in the unexplained infertility group when compared with those with semen factors. It was concluded that IP in combination with superovulation offered a simple, inexpensive, safe alternative to GIFT.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (5)

Cited by (5)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-04T02:00:05.705006+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK