Investigation on Effects of Training Schemes and Data Characteristics on Deep Learning-based Breast Cancer Classification

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

This preprint investigates how different deep learning model architectures (LSTM, GRU, DBN, and autoencoder) and training setups (80:20 split, 70:30 split, and k-fold) interact with breast cancer data characteristics (balanced, less imbalanced, and extremely imbalanced) for classifying benign versus malignant tumors using fine needle aspiration (FNA) signals. Models were trained and validated on two public Wisconsin datasets (WBC and WDBC), and the simulation results show that LSTM achieved the highest accuracy, F1-score, and AUC across variations in datasets, training methods, and data properties, with reported performance around 0.98–0.99 and up to an AUC of 1 for one dataset under a 3-fold scheme with balanced data. A stated limitation is that the study is simulation-based and uses only these datasets and preprocessing/partitioning schemes. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequently diagnosed cancer among women, surpassing all other types of cancer in terms of prevalence. It affects both males and females, but women are at a greater risk of developing it. The lifetime probability of developing breast cancer for women is approximately 1 in 38. The focus of this study is to differentiate between benign and malignant breast cancer tumors using the fine needle aspiration (FNA) signal as the primary source of information. Four deep learning (DL) models, namely long short-term memory (LSTM), Gated recurrent unit (GRU), Deep belief network (DBN), and autoencoder (AE) have been utilized to achieve this goal. The proposed models have been trained and validated using two public breast cancer datasets: the Wisconsin Original Breast Cancer dataset (WBC) and the Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer dataset (WDBC). To establish a reliable model, three different types of training techniques have been utilized, including the 80:20 split, the 70:30 split, and the k-fold method. The experimental investigation incorporated three different data characteristics, namely balanced, less imbalanced, and extremely imbalanced data. The simulation-based experimental findings indicate that the LSTM model achieves high levels of accuracy, F1-score, and area under the curve (AUC) when applied to the two commonly used datasets. The WDBC dataset yields accuracy, F1-score, and AUC values of 0.98, 0.98, and 0.99, respectively, while the WBCD dataset yields values of 0.99, 0.99, and 1, respectively. These results were obtained using a 3-fold training scheme and balanced data. The LSTM model consistently outperforms the other three models, regardless of variations in datasets, training methods, and changes in data properties. The efficacy of the models can be evaluated by subjecting the deep learning models to bigger and varying degrees of unbalanced data samples, including both balanced and less skewed datasets. To further this study, we aim to explore the effectiveness of DL models in conjunction with an IoT system to improve breast cancer detection accuracy in online mode for patients residing in remote areas.
Full text 13,272 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Investigation on Effects of Training Schemes and Data Characteristics on Deep Learning-based Breast Cancer Classification | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Investigation on Effects of Training Schemes and Data Characteristics on Deep Learning-based Breast Cancer Classification Madhumita Pal, Smita Parija, Ganapati Panda, Adysha Rath, Sujata Dash, and 2 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4227014/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequently diagnosed cancer among women, surpassing all other types of cancer in terms of prevalence. It affects both males and females, but women are at a greater risk of developing it. The lifetime probability of developing breast cancer for women is approximately 1 in 38. The focus of this study is to differentiate between benign and malignant breast cancer tumors using the fine needle aspiration (FNA) signal as the primary source of information. Four deep learning (DL) models, namely long short-term memory (LSTM), Gated recurrent unit (GRU), Deep belief network (DBN), and autoencoder (AE) have been utilized to achieve this goal. The proposed models have been trained and validated using two public breast cancer datasets: the Wisconsin Original Breast Cancer dataset (WBC) and the Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer dataset (WDBC). To establish a reliable model, three different types of training techniques have been utilized, including the 80:20 split, the 70:30 split, and the k-fold method. The experimental investigation incorporated three different data characteristics, namely balanced, less imbalanced, and extremely imbalanced data. The simulation-based experimental findings indicate that the LSTM model achieves high levels of accuracy, F1-score, and area under the curve (AUC) when applied to the two commonly used datasets. The WDBC dataset yields accuracy, F1-score, and AUC values of 0.98, 0.98, and 0.99, respectively, while the WBCD dataset yields values of 0.99, 0.99, and 1, respectively. These results were obtained using a 3-fold training scheme and balanced data. The LSTM model consistently outperforms the other three models, regardless of variations in datasets, training methods, and changes in data properties. The efficacy of the models can be evaluated by subjecting the deep learning models to bigger and varying degrees of unbalanced data samples, including both balanced and less skewed datasets. To further this study, we aim to explore the effectiveness of DL models in conjunction with an IoT system to improve breast cancer detection accuracy in online mode for patients residing in remote areas. Breast cancer DL models DL-based BC classification balanced data imbalanced data Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-4227014","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":289532204,"identity":"4a44b6b0-aa31-4ad3-a675-d27f711d873b","order_by":0,"name":"Madhumita Pal","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"C. V. Raman Global University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Madhumita","middleName":"","lastName":"Pal","suffix":""},{"id":289532205,"identity":"6edd2a3f-f522-45e7-b6d9-ebafe532e3f7","order_by":1,"name":"Smita Parija","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"C. V. Raman Global University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Smita","middleName":"","lastName":"Parija","suffix":""},{"id":289532206,"identity":"7fa9d675-75b0-416b-a670-7f2a6147e574","order_by":2,"name":"Ganapati Panda","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"C. V. Raman Global University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ganapati","middleName":"","lastName":"Panda","suffix":""},{"id":289532207,"identity":"596a64a3-d623-4c22-8469-6b0ab1a8b73a","order_by":3,"name":"Adysha Rath","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"C. V. Raman Global University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Adysha","middleName":"","lastName":"Rath","suffix":""},{"id":289532208,"identity":"2c0f0427-32e5-42ef-be53-e1497f5d42db","order_by":4,"name":"Sujata Dash","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Nagaland University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Sujata","middleName":"","lastName":"Dash","suffix":""},{"id":289532209,"identity":"aadb2d31-b379-49f7-b3d8-3dcff13256d6","order_by":5,"name":"Saurav Mallik","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Saurav","middleName":"","lastName":"Mallik","suffix":""},{"id":289532210,"identity":"46a65423-cffd-4179-b0bc-2b69c674c7ea","order_by":6,"name":"Hong Qin","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Tennessee at Chattanooga","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Hong","middleName":"","lastName":"Qin","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-04-06 10:44:25","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4227014/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4227014/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":101673853,"identity":"2900f7b1-67cf-4f05-85b2-c143968c25ef","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-02 13:13:28","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":995615,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Breastcancersujatasm.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4227014/v1_covered_613038f3-4116-4ed7-ab4d-55628a0ca505.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Investigation on Effects of Training Schemes and Data Characteristics on Deep Learning-based Breast Cancer Classification","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Breast cancer, DL models, DL-based BC classification, balanced data, imbalanced data","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4227014/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4227014/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eBreast cancer (BC) is the most frequently diagnosed cancer among women, surpassing all other types of cancer in terms of prevalence. It affects both males and females, but women are at a greater risk of developing it. The lifetime probability of developing breast cancer for women is approximately 1 in 38. The focus of this study is to differentiate between benign and malignant breast cancer tumors using the fine needle aspiration (FNA) signal as the primary source of information. Four deep learning (DL) models, namely long short-term memory (LSTM), Gated recurrent unit (GRU), Deep belief network (DBN), and autoencoder (AE) have been utilized to achieve this goal. The proposed models have been trained and validated using two public breast cancer datasets: the Wisconsin Original Breast Cancer dataset (WBC) and the Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer dataset (WDBC). To establish a reliable model, three different types of training techniques have been utilized, including the 80:20 split, the 70:30 split, and the k-fold method. The experimental investigation incorporated three different data characteristics, namely balanced, less imbalanced, and extremely imbalanced data. The simulation-based experimental findings indicate that the LSTM model achieves high levels of accuracy, F1-score, and area under the curve (AUC) when applied to the two commonly used datasets. The WDBC dataset yields accuracy, F1-score, and AUC values of 0.98, 0.98, and 0.99, respectively, while the WBCD dataset yields values of 0.99, 0.99, and 1, respectively. These results were obtained using a 3-fold training scheme and balanced data. The LSTM model consistently outperforms the other three models, regardless of variations in datasets, training methods, and changes in data properties. The efficacy of the models can be evaluated by subjecting the deep learning models to bigger and varying degrees of unbalanced data samples, including both balanced and less skewed datasets. To further this study, we aim to explore the effectiveness of DL models in conjunction with an IoT system to improve breast cancer detection accuracy in online mode for patients residing in remote areas.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Investigation on Effects of Training Schemes and Data Characteristics on Deep Learning-based Breast Cancer Classification","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-04-12 03:06:02","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4227014/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"6dacc742-c00a-43a0-9a8d-9c5cbe6607ad","owner":[],"postedDate":"April 12th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-02-02T13:12:13+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2024-04-12 03:06:02","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-4227014","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-4227014","identity":"rs-4227014","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-04T02:00:05.705006+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0