The first comparative metagenomic analysis of diarrheal and non-diarrheal gut microbiome leading to the identification of prospective prognostic markers and probiotics to protect from diarrhea: A Brief Report

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-19

This study compared diarrheal and non-diarrheal gut microbiomes, finding differences in phyla and families and identifying specific species like Prevotella copri and Proteus mirabilis as potential prognostic markers.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Introduction:  Diarrhea is a leading contributor of mortality. Its disease burden can be assuaged using enhanced prognostics and therapeutics. A cross-sectional gut microbiome analysis  of  non-diarrheal  and   diarrheal  fecal  samples was conducted to meet the goals of the Global Action Plan for Pneumonia and Diarrhea. Hypothesis: Next-generation Sequencing as a tool for epidemiological surveillance helps in the comparison of structural diversity of the gut microbiome of diarrheal and non-diarrheal samples and can identify prognostic and therapeutic candidates. Aim: The pilot study was designed to identify taxa that are enriched in non-diarrheal samples and to predict gut microbial interactions. Methodology: 16SrRNA amplicon sequencing  and  analysis  were deployed for taxonomic  profiling  and  abundance  interpretation  of  OTUs (Operational Taxonomic Units). Results: The findings suggested significant  differences  in structural composition between  the  two  groups. Firmicutes was the  most  abundant  phylum in most samples. B/F ratio was consistently <1 in all diarrheal samples. Proteobacteria  was    more  abundant  in    diarrheal  samples.  Prevotellaceae  was  the  most  abundant  family  in  non-diarrheal  samples.  Streptococcaceae  was  the  most  abundant  family  in  60%  diarrheal  samples.Where  Streptococcaceae  was  suppressed,  Bacteroideaceae  and  Nocardeaceae  were  the  most  abundant.    In  non-diarrheal  samples  where  Bifidobacteriaceae  was  the  most  abundant  other  families  were significantly low.  A  negative  correlation  was  observed  between  Prevotellaceae  and  Bacteroideaceae  in    non-diarrheal  samples.  Prevotella  copri  was  the  most  abundant  species  in  70%  non-diarrheal  samples  and  was  significantly  suppressed  in  diarrheal  samples.  Proteus  mirabilis  was  identified  in  all  the  non-diarrheal  samples  and  were  absent in  diarrheal  samples.  Conclusion: The OTUs  associated  with  diarrheal  dysbiosis  can  serve  as  prognostic  markers.  This is the first report on the comparative analysis of diarrheal and non-diarrheal microbiome.  The study addressed  gut microbiome dysbiosis from the context that can lead to the development of prognostic markers and probiotics for protecting the endemic population from diarrhea and help in reaching Sustainable Development Goals 2 and 3.
Full text 2,393 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Full text loading... Abstract Introduction: Diarrhea is a leading contributor of mortality. Its disease burden can be assuaged using enhanced prognostics and therapeutics. A cross-sectional gut microbiome analysis of non-diarrheal and diarrheal fecal samples was conducted to meet the goals of the Global Action Plan for Pneumonia and Diarrhea. Hypothesis: Next-generation Sequencing as a tool for epidemiological surveillance helps in the comparison of structural diversity of the gut microbiome of diarrheal and non-diarrheal samples and can identify prognostic and therapeutic candidates. Aim: The pilot study was designed to identify taxa that are enriched in non-diarrheal samples and to predict gut microbial interactions. Methodology: 16SrRNA amplicon sequencing and analysis were deployed for taxonomic profiling and abundance interpretation of OTUs (Operational Taxonomic Units). Results: The findings suggested significant differences in structural composition between the two groups. Firmicutes was the most abundant phylum in most samples. B/F ratio was consistently <1 in all diarrheal samples. Proteobacteria was more abundant in diarrheal samples. Prevotellaceae was the most abundant family in non-diarrheal samples. Streptococcaceae was the most abundant family in 60% diarrheal samples.Where Streptococcaceae was suppressed, Bacteroideaceae and Nocardeaceae were the most abundant. In non-diarrheal samples where Bifidobacteriaceae was the most abundant other families were significantly low. A negative correlation was observed between Prevotellaceae and Bacteroideaceae in non-diarrheal samples. Prevotella copri was the most abundant species in 70% non-diarrheal samples and was significantly suppressed in diarrheal samples. Proteus mirabilis was identified in all the non-diarrheal samples and were absent in diarrheal samples. Conclusion: The OTUs associated with diarrheal dysbiosis can serve as prognostic markers. This is the first report on the comparative analysis of diarrheal and non-diarrheal microbiome. The study addressed gut microbiome dysbiosis from the context that can lead to the development of prognostic markers and probiotics for protecting the endemic population from diarrhea and help in reaching Sustainable Development Goals 2 and 3. - Received: - Version Posted: Funding - DHR (Award R.12015/01/2018-HR) - Principal Award Recipient: Rituparna De

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-04T02:00:05.705006+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0