Investigating orientation adaptation following naturalistic film viewing

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Humans display marked changes to their perceptual experience of a stimulus following prolonged or repeated exposure to a preceding stimulus. A well-studied example of such perceptual adaptation is the tilt-aftereffect. Here, prolonged exposure to one orientation leads to a shift in the perception of subsequent orientations. Such a capacity to adapt suggests the visual system is dynamically tuned to our current visual environment. However, it remains unclear to what extent adaptation occurs in response to systematic features in naturalistic scenes. We therefore investigated orientation adaptation in response to natural viewing of filtered live-action film stimuli. Within a session, participants freely viewed 45 minutes of a film which had been filtered to include increased contrast energy within a specified orientation band (0°, 45°, 90°, or 135°; i.e., the adaptor). To measure adaptation effects, the film was intermittently interrupted to have participants perform a simple orientation judgement task. Having participants complete behavioural trials throughout the testing session, including 45 minutes of total adaptation time, allowed investigation of the accumulation of response biases and changes in such biases over the course of the session. We found participants exhibited stronger adaptation effects in response to cardinal adaptors compared to obliques. However, overall adaptation effects were weaker than those observed under typical tilt-aftereffect paradigms. Further, within a single session, adaptation effects developed inconsistently. The current findings therefore demonstrate a resistance to adaptation in response to naturalistic viewing conditions, suggesting barriers to understanding perceptual adaptation as experienced in nature.
Full text 1,856 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Humans display marked changes to their perceptual experience of a stimulus following prolonged or repeated exposure to a preceding stimulus. A well-studied example of such perceptual adaptation is the tilt-aftereffect. Here, prolonged exposure to one orientation leads to a shift in the perception of subsequent orientations. Such a capacity to adapt suggests the visual system is dynamically tuned to our current visual environment. However, it remains unclear to what extent adaptation occurs in response to systematic features in naturalistic scenes. We therefore investigated orientation adaptation in response to natural viewing of filtered live-action film stimuli. Within a session, participants freely viewed 45 minutes of a film which had been filtered to include increased contrast energy within a specified orientation band (0°, 45°, 90°, or 135°; i.e., the adaptor). To measure adaptation effects, the film was intermittently interrupted to have participants perform a simple orientation judgement task. Having participants complete behavioural trials throughout the testing session, including 45 minutes of total adaptation time, allowed investigation of the accumulation of response biases and changes in such biases over the course of the session. We found participants exhibited stronger adaptation effects in response to cardinal adaptors compared to obliques. However, overall adaptation effects were weaker than those observed under typical tilt-aftereffect paradigms. Further, within a single session, adaptation effects developed inconsistently. The current findings therefore demonstrate a resistance to adaptation in response to naturalistic viewing conditions, suggesting barriers to understanding perceptual adaptation as experienced in nature. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-04T02:00:05.705006+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0