Response letter to: "High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) along may not be a good choice for treatment of adenomyosis"

Cherng-Jye Jeng, Cherng‐Jye Jeng, Jeng CJ
Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology · 2023 · vol. 62(5) , pp. 784–785 · doi:10.1016/j.tjog.2023.07.029 · PMID:37679016 · W4386504366
letter OA: diamond CC0
🔓 Open OA copy View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-13 ⓘ

This letter to the editor responds to a previous publication regarding the efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for adenomyosis treatment.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

adenomyosis

MeSH descriptors

Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (1)

References (2)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-05T06:13:34.187606+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-08-05T06:12:27.331887+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK